And the Mohammed_Saeed_al-Sahaf award goes to...

[_Fortigurn]

To which of the LDS apologists should the Mohammed_Saeed_al-Sahaf award go?

To which Christian apologist should the award go to?

Since when were Mormons not Christians?

[_Jason Bourne]

To which of the LDS apologists should the Mohammed_Saeed_al-Sahaf award go?

To which Christian apologist should the award go to?

Since when were Mormons not Christians?

Mormons are Christians.

Let me be more specific. Orthodox Christian apologists. It always amazes me when an Christian of some other persuasion poo pahs LDS apologetics when other Christian aplogietcs are fraught with the same problems.

[_Fortigurn]

To which of the LDS apologists should the Mohammed_Saeed_al-Sahaf award go?

To which Christian apologist should the award go to?

Since when were Mormons not Christians?

Mormons are Christians.

That's my point.

Let me be more specific. Orthodox Christian apologists. It always amazes me when an Christian of some other persuasion poo pahs LDS apologetics when other Christian aplogietcs are fraught with the same problems.

I don't have any time for weak Christian apologetics either. On other forums you'll see me getting stuck into them without fear or favour. But as long as I'm not committing myself to weak apologetics, I don't have a problem identifying weaknesses in LDS or Christian apologetics.

[_Fortigurn]

Jason, since you asked I believe that 'JP Holding', of 'Tekton Apologetics Ministries' deserves the Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf award for his own idiosyncratic style of Christian apologetics.

[_Jason Bourne]

Jason, since you asked I believe that 'JP Holding', of 'Tekton Apologetics Ministries' deserves the Mohammed Saeed al-Sahaf award for his own idiosyncratic style of Christian apologetics.

Fair enough. I am a bit familiar with Holding.

I must say Fort, I do find you fairly balanced.

[_Fortigurn]

Thanks Jason, I would say the same about you. And you're certainly one of the most courteous posters here.