Shout out to RenegadeofPhunk!!!
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 34407
- Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4627
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am
Ray A wrote:And can YOU leave Mormons alone???
I didn't ever say if I could or couldn't. But I've been on these boards for five months, you've been on them for five years. When are you going to move on?
You are not even a Mormon,
So what?
and have, quite frankly, a pathetic understanding of Mormonism
Thanks. What's really pathetic is your pissing and moaning about the violence about to erupt from RfM. Of course you seem to be one of the few people who thinks its going to happen...but of course imagining crazy stuff seems to run to the very roots of Mormonism.
skewed by the BIGOTS who post here.
Whatever, mate. Have a Foster's and soon you'll forget Mormonism ever screwed with your mind.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14216
- Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am
Yes, there is, actually, and that's an apostate like you who spends her life trying to destroy what she once believed, and now denies! The least you could do is leave Mormons alone. But you have this gut-wrenching addiction to proving them wrong.
Yes, Ray, that is why I hunt Mormons down and force this information on them.
Oh, wait, I don't do that. Whoops. I actually post on boards expressly designed for discussion between believer and exbeliever. I don't force any Mormon to visit a board like this, nor do I force any Mormon to get on the internet and start searching for information about, say, evidence for the Book of Mormon.
The only Mormons who will ever read a thing I say about the subject have actively sought out this information or discussion.
But, in your skewed world view, that makes me an apostate who spends my life trying to destroy what I once believed.
by the way, I thought you dusted your feet of this place? Back so soon?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.
Penn & Teller
http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
Penn & Teller
http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4627
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am
beastie wrote:
by the way, I thought you dusted your feet of this place? Back so soon?
He can leave the board...but can't leave it alone (not unlike exmormons apparently concerning the Church).
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 5604
- Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm
Bond...James Bond wrote:beastie wrote:
by the way, I thought you dusted your feet of this place? Back so soon?
He can leave the board...but can't leave it alone (not unlike exmormons apparently concerning the Church).
Unless I'm mistaken, someone on the aptly named MADboard put Ray's remarks into proper context by pointing out that someone on RfM has said some extraordinarily mean things about his kids. Basically, his tantrum is a result of that.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 4627
- Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am
Mister Scratch wrote:Bond...James Bond wrote:beastie wrote:
by the way, I thought you dusted your feet of this place? Back so soon?
He can leave the board...but can't leave it alone (not unlike exmormons apparently concerning the Church).
Unless I'm mistaken, someone on the aptly named MADboard put Ray's remarks into proper context by pointing out that someone on RfM has said some extraordinarily mean things about his kids. Basically, his tantrum is a result of that.
My comment was about this board.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
Mister Scratch wrote:Bond...James Bond wrote:beastie wrote:
by the way, I thought you dusted your feet of this place? Back so soon?
He can leave the board...but can't leave it alone (not unlike exmormons apparently concerning the Church).
Unless I'm mistaken, someone on the aptly named MADboard put Ray's remarks into proper context by pointing out that someone on RfM has said some extraordinarily mean things about his kids. Basically, his tantrum is a result of that.
Frankly, I can't blame him for being upset. When you start insulting someone's kids, that's crossing the line. I would be pissed off, too.
Of course, I would probably just tell all of the jerks on RfM who said those things to go to Hell. Hopefully, he did that. I don't understand why the anger towards posters here, though...unless some of the posters here are the same ones who insulted his kids on the other board.
-
- _Emeritus
- Posts: 14117
- Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm
Ray A wrote:An angry exmo is a restless and disgruntled soul who can't find rest. Like a barnacle that attaches to a boat it wants to sink because it's jealous the boat is still floating while it has sunk. Is there any more pathetic a sight then one who seeks to destroy that which they once relied on for their own salvation? They bite the hand that once fed them. Like traitors sucking on blood, they lust after any blood left in those who still believe.
Ray, if you really wrote that, shouldn't you start getting worried about Mormons soon erupting into violence and genocide against ex-Mormons? Same rhetoric, different generation.
beastie wrote:Actually, I think there is a rhyme to his reason. It depends on which side offended him last.
ROTFLMFAO!!
Zingers like that, Beastie, remind me of just how glad I am that you post on this board.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"
--Louis Midgley
--Louis Midgley
Dr. Shades wrote:[ROTFLMFAO!!
Zingers like that, Beastie, remind me of just how glad I am that you post on this board.
Apparently you're of limited intelligence too. By the way, Shades, when are you going to remove the offensive, defamatory, and lying comments from Rollo and "Mister Scratch" about Dan Peterson's stand on Michael Quinn? Or are you going to allow defamation to stand in the name of "free speech".
beastie wrote:Actually, I think there is a rhyme to his reason. It depends on which side offended him last.
Not quite. I have consistently said that I'm uneasy with a fundamentalist approach to anything, and suggestions such as bringing back criminal penalties for adultery is one. The religious opposition to VE is another. And, sites like Jean Bordes'. Your problem is that you're a fundamentalist materialist and atheist, who "adores" Michael Shermer. This is secular worship, because what Shermer says, no matter how unfounded, pleases you. You worship at the altar of atheism. Maybe you just don't see what a materialist fundamentalist you are, who lives in plain denial. Keep on being critical beastie. When you finally realise that your witness of the Book of Mormon was not an illusion, I hope some sense is jolted into you.