New Book of Mormon Evidence!!!!!!

Post by **_silentkid** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:24 am

Paul Osborne wrote:Harmony,

Coggins7 is right.

http://www.myegyptology.net/file/id550.htm

Paul O

Right about it being a point of doctrine, or right about the assumption that only 6,000 years have passed since the fall of Adam? Unless Coggins believes in pre-Adamites, there is plenty of scientific evidence to suggest that this view is incorrect.

Post by **_harmony** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:32 am

Paul Osborne wrote:Harmony,

Coggins7 is right.

http://www.myegyptology.net/file/id550.htm

Paul O

I was hoping for something from the current leadership, Paul. I prefer to avoid doctrine spouted from ignorance.

Post by **_The Nehor** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:35 am

Polygamy Porter wrote:Stand up in GD class and espouse ideas of the earth being 50,000 100,000, 1,000,000 years old, HELL say it is 9,000 years old and see what general reaction you will get from the class.

As the teacher of a GD class I said that the Church had no official doctrine of Creation and then said that I believed it was roughly as old as the geologists tell me it is. No one reacted at all and we moved on.

_Paul Osborne · Post by **_Paul Osborne** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:38 am

Harmony,

How about you scroll through all the quotes and read them and see how current some of them really are.

Don't be such a hasty little girl!

Paul O

Post by **_silentkid** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:41 am

The Nehor wrote:As the teacher of a GD class I said that the Church had no official doctrine of Creation and then said that I believed it was roughly as old as the geologists tell me it is. No one reacted at all and we moved on.

My experience with this is similar. Most members put that kind of stuff in their "it's not pertinent to my eternal salvation" box and move on.

Post by **_truth dancer** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:42 am

Beastie...

First, who made you the expert?

And just because some scientists believe these bones are a few hundred thousand years old doesn't make it so.

Science has to adjust its information all the time and those tests they do to determine how old bones are... well who says they are accurate?

There is still a lot of evidence to be uncovered... just wait!

(wink)

~dancer~

_Paul Osborne · Post by **_Paul Osborne** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 1:55 am

I agree with truth dancer. And she is so sweet!

Paul O

Post by **_The Nehor** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:12 am

Was this meant as an example of something supporting the Book of Mormon? If so, how?

Post by **_silentkid** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:21 am

The Nehor wrote:Was this meant as an example of something supporting the Book of Mormon? If so, how?

No...I'm pretty sure beastie was being sarcastic. So was TD, hence the (wink).

Post by **_moksha** » Mon Jun 18, 2007 2:31 am

Is there any evidence to show that these mastodons were not in fact time travelers, who could have appeared to the Nephites?