Why would Mod Rhad's post be signed 'Smac'?

Post by **_asbestosman** » Tue Jul 10, 2007 11:30 pm

I saw one of the old mods reveal his/her identity too. I ended up PM'ing him/her although he/she had already fixed things by that time.

Post by **_Alter Idem** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:05 am

Bond...James Bond wrote:Ha ha ha!!!

So has Smac been a moderator before this (that anyone knows of)?

Now I want a secret moderation identity.....:(

I don't think so.

I agree they'll probably retire Rhad now, since his cover is blown--Too bad; I liked his avatar.

Post by **_moksha** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:19 am

Alter Idem wrote:I agree they'll probably retire Rhad now, since his cover is blown--Too bad; I liked his avatar.

They might be forced to form a double secret society and refer to themselves as "The Julianns".

Post by **_Alter Idem** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:47 am

moksha wrote:
Alter Idem wrote:I agree they'll probably retire Rhad now, since his cover is blown--Too bad; I liked his avatar.

They might be forced to form a double secret society and refer to themselves as "The Julianns".

LOL, Oh, too true. I think they'll have to place Rhad/smac on double secret probation as well. He may not have what it takes to be one of the "Juliannes" if he can't keep his identity secret.

Post by **_Daniel Peterson** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:52 am

CaliforniaKid wrote:It also reminds me of when DCP made a spelling error immediately after correcting someone else's spelling, and I quoted it just for kicks and giggles, and then not only Dan's post but also my post was mysteriously corrected a few minutes later with no edit notice at the bottom of either.

hmmm...

Really now. Which is more likely: That I made a spelling error, or that you were hallucinating? (Think "David Hume.") Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

Post by **_Doctor Steuss** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 2:56 am

Daniel Peterson wrote:
CaliforniaKid wrote:It also reminds me of when DCP made a spelling error immediately after correcting someone else's spelling, and I quoted it just for kicks and giggles, and then not only Dan's post but also my post was mysteriously corrected a few minutes later with no edit notice at the bottom of either.

hmmm...

Really now. Which is more likely: That I made a spelling error, or that you were hallucinating? (Think "David Hume.") Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

*Snort* I gots a bit of my Diet Coke on the screen...

Post by **_Bond...James Bond** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 3:13 am

DCP has obviously been reading those stoner dialogues between CaliforniaKid and CKSalmon. It's so obvious they're stoners in real life as well....

Post by **_Smac97** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 4:53 am

Hmm. That went about as well as could be expected, didn't it?

I've actually screwed up in this way 3 or 4 times, but the previous times I saw it immediately and made a fix.

I'm not sure Rhad will be discontinued (it is a cool avatar, after all).

-Smac

Post by **_CaliforniaKid** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 6:34 am

Signing the post as smac was just a red herring from juliann. ;-)

_Yoda · Post by **_Yoda** » Wed Jul 11, 2007 1:12 pm

Bond...James Bond wrote:DCP has obviously been reading those stoner dialogues between CaliforniaKid and CKSalmon. It's so obvious they're stoners in real life as well....

Those stoner conversations are so cool! :)

smac wrote:Oops.
Hmm. That went about as well as could be expected, didn't it?

I've actually screwed up in this way 3 or 4 times, but the previous times I saw it immediately and made a fix.

I'm not sure Rhad will be discontinued (it is a cool avatar, after all).

-Smac

It's ok, Smac. Your secret is safe with us! LOL