What does it feel like to be wrong about your religion?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by _Jason Bourne »


I, too, am accused of pride and arrogance, not only by my Mormon family members, but also by my Evangelical Christian husband.


You are married to an Evangelical Christian? Is he active and a fundie type?

Man out of the frying pan and into to the fire for you.
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

Wow, this whole thread has been a cornucopia of quotable quotations!

First, Sethbag: Thank you for your thought-provoking, well-reasoned post!

Second, Kevin:

Mormons feel they are elite in a sense I have never felt as a Baptist or Catholic.


You were once Catholic? That's news to me. I thought you had been born into the Baptist faith but converted (at age 18?) to Mormonism. What's the Catholic connection?

Third, Beastie:

And yes, it does take a great deal of humility to get to the point where you are able to admit that you may be wrong about your most cherished, valued belief. This is why it amazes me when believers say people often fall away from the church due to pride. It's the opposite of pride, actually.


Excellent point! One to remember.

Fouth, guy sajer:

What is evidence of greater pride; conceding that one is wrong, or refusing to consider the possibility that one is wrong? I find the "pride" accusation laughably silly.


Another great point.

When accused of arrogance by my siblings, my standard response is, "Which of us claims that the other will be punished for eternity for not believing as he does?"


Don't leave us in suspense; how do they respond?

Fifth, KimberlyAnn:

I, too, am accused of pride and arrogance, not only by my Mormon family members, but also by my Evangelical Christian husband. The Mormons and Christians in my family do not accuse one another of arrogance, yet they all hurl that label at me. It's arrogance and pride that keep me from believing Mormonism. It's arrogance and pride that keep me from believing the Bible is the inerrant word of God. No matter what I cannot believe, it's arrogance that keeps me from believing it.


Next time, tell them that it's arrogance and pride that keeps them from becoming Atheists.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by _Jason Bourne »


I don't see the situation for a person thinking of himself or herself as Christain as changing the point made by Seth.
Just replace Mormon by Christian and JW's by Muslim. Then read it again with a few obvious and minor changes.

The point is that with religion, one finds oneself immersed in a situation where considering that one's belief system is not valid is impossible except in some abstract and formal way. If the question were a scientific one, then one would not fear reading opposing views and contrary evidence.
But with religion, this is implicitly or explicitly verboten.
For example, someone on this board just told me that thier spuse would not even touch a book that challenged biblical fundamentalism.


No it does not at all. The reason I raised it was because Dart commented that LDS doctrine about one true church created elitism and implied that was not the case for Catholics or Baptists.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

guy sajer wrote:
What is evidence of greater pride; conceding that one is wrong, or refusing to consider the possibility that one is wrong? I find the "pride" accusation laughably silly.

When accused of arrogance by my siblings, my standard response is, "Which of us claims that the other will be punished for eternity for not believing as he does?"

What could be more arrogant than actually believing that people who hold different beliefs than ourselves will be eternally punished for it?


It's possible to believe that without being arrogant about it. The key is to forget all that 'special' crap and realize that you deserve exactly the same fate.

Saying believing it is arrogant is like saying it is arrogant for someone to tell someone not to step in front of a train if the person doing the stepping believes it is perfectly safe. People can be arrogant and be right and they can be arrogant and be wrong.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Saying believing it is arrogant is like saying it is arrogant for someone to tell someone not to step in front of a train if the person doing the stepping believes it is perfectly safe. People can be arrogant and be right and they can be arrogant and be wrong.


The arrogance comes into play because the topic is essentially unprovable - religious belief. It is certainly provable that if you step in front of a train you'll get hurt.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_guy sajer
_Emeritus
Posts: 1372
Joined: Tue Jan 16, 2007 2:16 am

Post by _guy sajer »

The Nehor wrote:
guy sajer wrote:
What is evidence of greater pride; conceding that one is wrong, or refusing to consider the possibility that one is wrong? I find the "pride" accusation laughably silly.

When accused of arrogance by my siblings, my standard response is, "Which of us claims that the other will be punished for eternity for not believing as he does?"

What could be more arrogant than actually believing that people who hold different beliefs than ourselves will be eternally punished for it?


It's possible to believe that without being arrogant about it. The key is to forget all that 'special' crap and realize that you deserve exactly the same fate.

Saying believing it is arrogant is like saying it is arrogant for someone to tell someone not to step in front of a train if the person doing the stepping believes it is perfectly safe. People can be arrogant and be right and they can be arrogant and be wrong.


It is not arrogance to warn someone not to step in front of a train; that is prudence based on observable laws of physics and empirical learning.

We're talking about matters of opinion--unprovable, unknowable opinion.

It is further arrogance for one to believe that he/she knows the mind of the creator of the universe and Grand Celestial Poobah.

There are many forms of arrogance, but religious arrogance is right at the top of the list. (Granted, many atheists are arrogant bastards as well, but that in no way excuses the arrogance of religious dogmatists.)
God . . . "who mouths morals to other people and has none himself; who frowns upon crimes, yet commits them all; who created man without invitation, . . . and finally, with altogether divine obtuseness, invites this poor, abused slave to worship him ..."
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

Assume for a moment that we're right and that what we say could keep you out of hell for a time. Is it arrogance to share that or worry about it? If I believe it (as I do) I would have to be a monster not to share it.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Assume for a moment that we're right and that what we say could keep you out of hell for a time. Is it arrogance to share that or worry about it? If I believe it (as I do) I would have to be a monster not to share it.


So I'm guessing you don't have a problem with EV temple picketers who have the same motivation?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Tarski
_Emeritus
Posts: 3059
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:57 pm

Post by _Tarski »

The Nehor wrote:Assume for a moment that we're right and that what we say could keep you out of hell for a time. Is it arrogance to share that or worry about it? If I believe it (as I do) I would have to be a monster not to share it.


The world is full of religions that are urgently trying to convert the world for its own good.
Look around! Does that seem like a good thing? Is it working out for the benefit of the world?
_ozemc
_Emeritus
Posts: 397
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 3:21 pm

Post by _ozemc »

Jason Bourne wrote:
ozemc wrote:
Jason Bourne wrote:
dartagnan wrote:What I always find interesting is that the apologists and other LDS like to think they are just like any other Church that claims to be true, but there is a subtle difference. Mormons feel they are elite in a sense I have never felt as a Baptist or Catholic. Mormons are the only true Church, which means everyone else is "wrong" about their religion. It is also a New Religious Movement which many people grasp onto for psychological and sociological purposes. It gives people a sense of purpose and good feeling, without any concern for whether or not its truth claims are true. This is a recipe for arrogance and confirmation bias. This elite status is what sets them apart from other faiths. Therefore, there can be nothing "wrong" about Mormonism or else it is just like the rest. Whenever flaws are pointed out in the Church, the usual rationalization kicks in. You know, things like "the Church is still perfect even if the people aren't."

It took me a while to realize how dumb this comment really is because the membership = the Church. The Church is only as perfect as those who comprise it.


Don't Catholics believe they are the one true church with the priesthood and the Vicar of Christ? Didn't the pope just emphasize this? Don't baptists believe they have the truth? Oh sure other True Christians can be found in other places but you have to be Christian-then you are saved, a child of God, and only then. The rest are toast. Why would this not generate just as much elitism as is found in the LDS idea of being the true church?


I think the difference, Jason, is that, with the exception of the Catholic church, most other churches I've been in, from Lutheran, to Methodist, to Disciples of Christ (which I am now), all seem accepting as long as you have a belief in Christ. None that I've experienced indicated that I had to join their church to be saved.

I am a bit confused over your statement that you have to be a Christian? Isn't that the point of going to a Christian church? I mean, you probably wouldn't go if you weren't one, right?

It is my understanding, and belief, that all those who believe in Christ are part of His church, not just any specific denomination.


A "saved" Christian believes they have preferential standing before God, are his children and others are not will be in heaven, will judge the non Christians along with the apostles, others will be in Hell. THis is quite elitist.


Well, of course they do and it is. That's part and parcel of the religion.

You know, even though I consider myself a "Christian", I believe that it would be very presumptous of me to tell God who could and could not be in Heaven.

Kind of like I think about those who say "so and so is a Saint, so and so is a Prophet", etc.

I'm going to tell God who is a saint or a prophet? Isn't that His job?
"What does God need with a starship?" - Captain James T. Kirk

Most people would like to be delivered from temptation but would like it to keep in touch. - Robert Orben
Post Reply