LDS housewife writes book; Zoidberg pukes

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Oh, I just made a video that would be appropriate for this subject:


Wow! Did you really make that video???

I'm revealing my sad technological ignorance by revealing how impressed I am by that, aren't I?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_barrelomonkeys
_Emeritus
Posts: 3004
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:00 pm

Post by _barrelomonkeys »

beastie wrote:
Oh, I just made a video that would be appropriate for this subject:


Wow! Did you really make that video???

I'm revealing my sad technological ignorance by revealing how impressed I am by that, aren't I?



Yep, but I sort of screwed it up. Rosie the Riveter (in all her "We Can Do It" glory) was supposed to be the image at the last bit... I screwed that up. When I'm less lazy I'll fix it.
_truth dancer
_Emeritus
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Post by _truth dancer »

Hi Blixa...

I always thought FW was unintentionally catering to latent pedophilia: the unending references to acting (even dressing) like a little girl and being "child like" were very, very troubling. Even leaving the sexual ickiness out of it, the idea of counseling a woman to never truly be an adult human is despicable.


Ohhh yes... I remember wondering what kind of man wants to be married to a child?

A pedophile, a power hungry abusive man who can't handle discussion, disagreement, or altering opinions.

A man who feels powerful by dominating, controlling, and ruling others.

A man who considers women as some sort of subservient, second class, not quite human creature.

Basically, a man who has some serious issues! :-(

~dancer~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
_barrelomonkeys
_Emeritus
Posts: 3004
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:00 pm

Post by _barrelomonkeys »

truth dancer wrote:Hi Blixa...

I always thought FW was unintentionally catering to latent pedophilia: the unending references to acting (even dressing) like a little girl and being "child like" were very, very troubling. Even leaving the sexual ickiness out of it, the idea of counseling a woman to never truly be an adult human is despicable.


Ohhh yes... I remember wondering what kind of man wants to be married to a child?

A pedophile, a power hungry abusive man who can't handle discussion, disagreement, or altering opinions.

A man who feels powerful by dominating, controlling, and ruling others.

A man who considers women as some sort of subservient, second class, not quite human creature.

Basically, a man who has some serious issues! :-(

~dancer~



But the odd thing about men like this, in my experience, is that they're not really attracted to these females. In the sense that I think about sexual attraction.

Men that enjoy control wish to rule them. Batter them down. That is not a man truly wanting to be married to a woman that he enjoys. It's that he enjoys himself and the feeling of power he gains from pushing them down.

The woman is second to that need. She's merely a tool that he uses to amp up his own pride and self inflation.

Then as he becomes more successful in his domination he enjoys her less and less. She is dehumanized and is molded into a "child". Then he can demean her even more for acting in mannerisms that he forced upon her.
Again. *BARF*
_Pokatator
_Emeritus
Posts: 1417
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:38 pm

Post by _Pokatator »

Truth Dancer is totally correct this is the Stepford Wife How-to-Manual.

And what man in his right or left mind would want a woman, er I mean, female like that? Nothing fascinating there for me. Pukefest for sure.
_Zoidberg
_Emeritus
Posts: 523
Joined: Sat Sep 22, 2007 2:42 am

Post by _Zoidberg »

barrelomonkeys wrote:But the odd thing about men like this, in my experience, is that they're not really attracted to these females. In the sense that I think about sexual attraction.

Men that enjoy control wish to rule them. Batter them down. That is not a man truly wanting to be married to a woman that he enjoys. It's that he enjoys himself and the feeling of power he gains from pushing them down.

The woman is second to that need. She's merely a tool that he uses to amp up his own pride and self inflation.

Then as he becomes more successful in his domination he enjoys her less and less. She is dehumanized and is molded into a "child". Then he can demean her even more for acting in mannerisms that he forced upon her.
Again. *BARF*


That's really good insight, IMHO. The book completely dehumanizes women and strips them of their individuality as a recipe for marital bliss. Be a tool. A loving, adoring, admiring, saucy, childlike tool. I bet they watch Stepford Wives (not the part where the women rebel, of course) as past of their lessons.

On a related note: is it this book that's responsible for the proliferation of the infamous Relief Society voice? That would explain a lot.
"reason and religion are friends and allies" - Mitt Romney
_truth dancer
_Emeritus
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Post by _truth dancer »

Hi Book of Mormon...

Nice video by the way! :-)

But the odd thing about men like this, in my experience, is that they're not really attracted to these females. In the sense that I think about sexual attraction.


You are correct... they are interested, not in a relationship, intimacy, mutual sharing and caring, or even love. They are interested in control, power, and domination.

Men that enjoy control wish to rule them. Batter them down. That is not a man truly wanting to be married to a woman that he enjoys. It's that he enjoys himself and the feeling of power he gains from pushing them down.


Exactly! The pleasure is about feelings of power and control, NOT about companionship and love.

The woman is second to that need. She's merely a tool that he uses to amp up his own pride and self inflation.


Yes you are right! She is the tool he uses to feel powerful.

Then as he becomes more successful in his domination he enjoys her less and less. She is dehumanized and is molded into a "child". Then he can demean her even more for acting in mannerisms that he forced upon her.


I think of it as an addiction, where the stimulant is never enough. The more he feels powerful the more he needs to feel powerful. What may have given him that high from domination becomes no longer sufficient.

It is a horrible dynamic!

~dancer~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
_CaliforniaKid
_Emeritus
Posts: 4247
Joined: Wed Jan 10, 2007 8:47 am

Post by _CaliforniaKid »

Some time ago I saw a black-and-white video on youtube about how to be a good wife. I think it was the real deal, like from the 60's or something. It was hilarious.
_barrelomonkeys
_Emeritus
Posts: 3004
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:00 pm

Post by _barrelomonkeys »

CaliforniaKid wrote:Some time ago I saw a black-and-white video on youtube about how to be a good wife. I think it was the real deal, like from the 60's or something. It was hilarious.


This one? This is a spoof one.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zVLDuLPi ... ed&search=
_Gadianton
_Emeritus
Posts: 9947
Joined: Sat Jul 07, 2007 5:12 am

Post by _Gadianton »

i need to get a copy of this for my wife...
Lou Midgley 08/20/2020: "...meat wad," and "cockroach" are pithy descriptions of human beings used by gemli? They were not fashioned by Professor Peterson.

LM 11/23/2018: one can explain away the soul of human beings...as...a Meat Unit, to use Professor Peterson's clever derogatory description of gemli's ideology.
Post Reply