Russell M. vs. board of psychology thought experiment

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.

What do the pscyhologists determine about Russell's beliefs in God as a man?

He believes God is a man the same way he believes he'll get wet in the rain.
1
9%
The lie detector catches him in a lie; he doesn't believe it but professes it.
1
9%
His rational mind retreats while a psychological golem answers (compartmentalizing).
4
36%
His professed belief is determined a fantasy and he's unable to provide an answer about God that constitutes belief.
1
9%
His rational mind sincerely expresses the words but the real beliefs are embedded in complex symbolism behind the actual words.
3
27%
Other. Explain in comments.
1
9%
 
Total votes: 11

I Have Questions
God
Posts: 1794
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Russell M. vs. board of psychology thought experiment

Post by I Have Questions »

Gadianton wrote:
Mon Mar 17, 2025 12:40 am
Great thoughts, SaturdaysV, you're killing me. Great example bringing up the flight of doom and how that might relate to his other religious beliefs. I'll have to think about that one.
Total speculation to underscore the problem with saying we ever "knew" the church was true
I got really literal here in this thread and I probably shouldn't have put so much emphasis on specific wording.

Phrasing like "I know the Church is true" and the actual active belief that there is a man who lives near Kolob who created the world, aren't necessarily the same thing. Saying "I know the Church is true" is rote that they learned to say from the time they were small. It could be regarded as a figure of speech and not very meaningful. Some do get hung up on it and are given Packer's talk. Both my parents were equally devout believers and believed in the Church with the same self-flagellating intensity. My mom had no doubts about the Church, but she did doubt her testimony and didn't like to bear it because she wasn't sure she "knew". My dad would bear his testimony nonstop and with over-the-top conviction. It would be a dice roll to bet on one over the other over who would get farther on a lie-detector test.
Saying “I know the Church is true” seems to me to be a sort of pledge of allegiance rather than a statement about knowledge.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Post Reply