Ben park says:
Unfortunately, Ben, that's not so clear. According to fellow MI scholar Grant Hardy:Ben Park wrote:I didn’t think I’d have to say this, and I don’t feel like writing a whole op-Ed about it, but let me be clear: Donald Trump is not a Captain Moroni.
Hardy offers a "gritty" version of the Book of Mormon that makes it more appealing as a story. It becomes like "The Wire" rather than "CHiPs", where moral gray is accepted in exchange for depth and credibility. Hardy's version is a Book of Mormon for mature readers.JBMS wrote:Sometimes, Hardy posits that what an author-cum-editor says in the Book of Mormon and what he does can be quite different. For example, what Mormon says about the controversial character of Captain Moroni is that he was a man of “perfect understanding” who sets an example for us all to emulate (Alma 48). He is described in Mormon’s words as “firm in the faith of Christ,” a person of deep religious conviction. Yet as Hardy points out, the primary sources Mormon chooses to include show Captain Moroni to be quick to anger and slow to pray—he is never portrayed praying or appealing to God. Moreover, this man that Mormon tells us “did not delight in bloodshed” may have been more brutal than necessary in warfare. By including these sources, it’s possible that Mormon is offering subtle criticism of Captain Moroni, a reproach that a lesser interpreter than Hardy would almost certainly pass over
The problem with this, is that it opens up acceptance of negative heroes as instruments of God's hand. It could be argued that Trump is akin to the "conflicted" Moroni of Hardy, who wasn't perfect but served the Lord's purpose. That's version 2 of the religious Right's portrayal of Trump. On Wednesdays, Trump is the knight in shining armor. On Fridays, he's "the plumber" who is rough around the edges and crude, but the guy you need to get the job done. And so the new MI must be careful, as the postmodern version of Mormon heroes could very well end up being figures like Trump.