Do you believe God intervenes & answers prayers?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Re: The False Extension

Post by _Jersey Girl »

JAK wrote:Jersey Girl,

Try to understand that the particular intent is irrelevant. People who subscribe to prayer engage in prayer with the intent to manipulate God.

Evaluations of the intent are judgments which could be applied various ways to a specific prayer example. The intent of prayer by individuals or organizations (denominations) is to manipulate some notion of God (or earlier gods) to act in an intervening way.

Why pray?

I gave two brief examples of prayers. In prayer we quickly discover action verbs that are placed following a God word or one which represents what the people praying intend to refer to some supernatural power.

I have demonstrated exactly what you are talking about here. You may not wish to see it, but I have demonstrated it.

What does a mother who has a son in Iraq intend when she prays: “God protect my son from the tragedy of injury or death. God bring him home safely to his family.”? What does she intend?

That is a most common prayer these days in the United States by mothers of sons in Iraq (and others who have relatives at war).

Why are these mothers praying?

They believe or worry that without talking to God telling God to protect their son what?

They believe or worry that without their prayers God may not protect. Their intent is to manipulate God to act, to protect, to intervene in the safety of their son.

As I pointed out previously, your attempt to muddy the issue is beside the point at hand. It’s irrelevant.

We could construct hundreds of prayers here which are realistically representative of what people actually pray.

Look again at the list of verbs in the list I provided as example. They are all attempts to manipulate, to control, to direct the force of their God notion. And they say or write their prayers with the intent to manipulate.

None of your sidetrack adverbs or adjectives are relevant to the intent of prayer.. People who pray want specific action from (their) God. Through words, they attempt to manipulate the action they desire.

Read and listened to:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=BH0rFZIqo8A

http://youtube.com/watch?v=jk6ILZAaAMI

JAK


JAK,

The intent is entirely relevant to the definition of the word "manipulate". Posting a complete definition of the word you are choosing to use is not muddying the waters or sidetracking. It is a demonstration that your use of the word by cherry picking one portion of the meaning without acknowledging the remainder of it, is in error.

What you refer to as "None of your sidetrack adverbs or adjectives" are not mine. They are part of the formal definition of "manipulate". They are what distinguishes manipulation from influence or appeal.

Jersey Girl
Last edited by Google Feedfetcher on Fri Mar 09, 2007 3:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Roger Morrison
_Emeritus
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:13 am

Post by _Roger Morrison »

Jak, "Prayer" is as interesting a topic as "God" is a subject. Impossible to tie together in any objective fashion... I imagine "God" came first. THEN the next step of primitive 'asperation' was/is to communicate with the grantor of favour, and power to bless "Me and Mine" and to curse "Them others" (My enemies).

In any other pursuit of 'advantage' it takes fewer experiences of 'failure' before one concludes, "...it ain't working!" Why has it taken soooooo long for reality to tweak intelligence into admission that "God" is no respector of persons or prayer?

Jesus is said to have said, "...you don't have to ask "God" for anything; "He" knows the needs of the living, and provides them to all creatures that creep, crawl, swim, walk or/and fly, to sustain their lives...until it doesn't..." Then the next generation gets their share... Supposedly growing smarter--adapting better than their parents... Human evolution and advancement of knowledge...

Is the human need of significance/immortalty so strong that it blocks reason and prefers phantasy to factual assessment of the "Prayer" experiment? What % of failure is sufficient to admit 'wishing' is not fundamental to 'receiving', but more to deception, disappointment and failure to achieve the "wish"?

"God Bless America" is the epitome of arrogance, ignorance and nonsense, IMSCO... Added at the beginning of America's decline... Warm regards, Roger
_JAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1593
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:04 pm

Post by _JAK »

Roger Morrison wrote:Jak, "Prayer" is as interesting a topic as "God" is a subject. Impossible to tie together in any objective fashion... I imagine "God" came first. THEN the next step of primitive 'asperation' was/is to communicate with the grantor of favour, and power to bless "Me and Mine" and to curse "Them others" (My enemies).

In any other pursuit of 'advantage' it takes fewer experiences of 'failure' before one concludes, "...it ain't working!" Why has it taken soooooo long for reality to tweak intelligence into admission that "God" is no respector of persons or prayer?


In short, an answer to that question lies in one’s wishful thinking or one's desire to believe in the superstition -- with whatever one that a person has had a cradle up experience. It’s going to take much longer. The pundits of propaganda will continue to sell the myths. Many will buy. The vulnerable will buy.

Not entirely dissimilar is the gambler who keeps playing even though his/her losses exceed the wins. Some gamblers even pray to win. If or when they win, their superstition is reinforced.

There are many additional reasons that wishful thinking Trump's reason.


Roger Morrison wrote:Jesus is said to have said, "...you don't have to ask "God" for anything; "He" knows the needs of the living, and provides them to all creatures that creep, crawl, swim, walk or/and fly, to sustain their lives...until it doesn't..." Then the next generation gets their share... Supposedly growing smarter--adapting better than their parents... Human evolution and advancement of knowledge...

Is the human need of significance/immortalty so strong that it blocks reason and prefers phantasy to factual assessment of the "Prayer" experiment? What % of failure is sufficient to admit 'wishing' is not fundamental to 'receiving', but more to deception, disappointment and failure to achieve the "wish"?


The % of failure varies with individuals. So, there isn’t one in the sense of your question. A 90% failure rate may leave people praying in an attempt to change an outcome by “talking” God into their wishes. People often ask their friends & relatives to pray for them. The assumption is that the more who pray telling God the outcome they want God to command, the greater chance that all those prayers will produce the desired result.

Roger Morrison wrote:"God Bless America" is the epitome of arrogance, ignorance and nonsense, IMSCO... Added at the beginning of America's decline... Warm regards, Roger


I quite agree with your analysis!

JAK
_JAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1593
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:04 pm

Attempts to Manipulate God

Post by _JAK »

Jersey Girl wrote:
JAK,

You have not demonstrated that prayer fits the description of to "manipulate" according to a formal definition. If you have definitions to offer that do not indicate that manipulate is an attempt to influence or control without devious intent, I'm willing to consider it.

Jersey Girl


Jersey Girl,

Meaning of language is derived from application of words in context. At considerable length, I constructed in previous posts application for prayer with verbs which have intent to manipulate the user’s perception of God for his personal benefit. Likely the greatest of intent is elimination of death. There are many other manipulations short of that which are inherent in the words of religious myth and words in Christianity in particular.

You will recall that you offered no refutation or denial that the words in these examples are typical of Christian appeal.

Previously:
manipulate -- to influence

While there are various nuances for the word and applications, it’s applied correctly in my illustrations. Your grandson intends to influence you (whom he can see and with whom has interaction that is fully transparent).

We have evidence for you in your illustration. Your grandson is not praying to you when he asks you to do something which it’s obvious to him that you can do.

However, religious prayer is an attempt to manipulate an environment about which there is rational doubt. Absent genuine evidence for God as characterized by religious dogma of various religions, doubt is a critical component in the attempt to manipulate deity.

Asking God to facilitate a cure for cancer is a significantly different application of attempt to manipulate than your grandson asking you to open the door.

Nevertheless, the word “manipulate” is appropriately applied when people pray that an unestablished entity (God) change/alter an outcome that may become/be the fact.

Praying to be cured of cancer is not equivalent to asking someone to “open the door.” Nor is most prayer equivalent to a communication between people for such a thing as simple as “open the door.” That’s not what people pray for.

Your grandson does not say: “Please God, have grandpa open the door so that I can go out and play.” It would be absurd when your grandson is looking at you and knows, knows what you can do given the situation you described. People don’t pray for what they regard as certainty. (Example: turning on a light switch in a dark room)

So in prayer, people attempt to manipulate God (their notion of the invention God). That attempt to manipulate generally encompasses a condition for which another person is likely inadequate to produce desired result.

In my previous comment, I asked why pray. Why pray?. What do people think or say when they pray?

An expression of “gratitude” may be a perceived method of softening up God. That is, the person: thanks God for a variety of things previously realized or in place, then the person attempts manipulation of the perceived God for more favor.

Of course your grandson, if he is smart, could work the same method on you. He could thank you for something you actually did (transparency is critical), then he could express his desire that you do more for him. That doesn’t make him bad, only smart, courteous, and/or clever.

Why pray?.

Consider that in all these examples there is an attempt to manipulate a perceived entity sufficiently powerful to produce, AND sufficiently subject to manipulation to be persuaded (by prayer to act. Look at the bold highlight which I have added. Notice the action verbs which are used in the attempt to manipulate behavior of the perceived God.

Examples in the following:

Build a spirit of sacrificial love in me toward my life partner.
Teach me to love my wife today the same way Jesus loves me.
Bless my spouse today with your richest blessing in Christ Jesus.
Provide the spiritual needs of my spouse in a way that glorifies You.
Teach both of us to trust your Word without compromise.
Help me keep be faithful to the covenant I made with my eyes.

Protect my children from trouble unless in so doing you're preparing them to serve you.
Lead my children in paths of righteousness and keep them from straying too far.
Protect my kids today, but do what's necessary to train them to make decisions based on your Word.
Lead my children to learn a gentler, more teachable spirit.
Remind my children of Scripture as they contemplate action today.
Grant my children a healthy appetite for your Word.

The efforts to manipulate are extensive in prayers of which these may be typical. These are but a few examples which clearly demonstrate the intent to manipulate some kind of God invention.

Keep in mind as well that invention of gods in the evolution of the human species did not precede the development of early cultures with emergence of language as a form of communication. So “invention” is a correct term to apply to gods and to the newer idea God. Historically, we can trace the emergence of god notions and their collision course with scientific discovery which rendered such notions irrelevant to rational analysis and problem solving.

Let’s look at some other terms often repeated in attempts to manipulate perceptions of gods or God as most religious people today are monotheist.

Some action verbs which are following God in
typical prayers.

Protect
Provide
Make
Give
Bless
Go
Meet (the needs)
Watch (over)
Restore
Sustain
Heal (applied to a vast array of ills)
Direct
Win (people)
Reveal
Remind
Show
Strengthen
Refresh
Grant
Comfort
Help
Supply


Such verbs are in constructions intended to manipulate an invented notion of deity. Keep in mind as well that notions of deity have changed over time and continue to change as religious myth tends to give way to factual analysis.

People use doctors, hospitals, and the latest in medical science for treatment. Some who are successfully treated thank God rather than the medical team.

Recently, a woman in North Korea (75) received cataract surgery from an American doctor. When she could see for the first time in many years, she kissed the ground and thanked Kim Jong-il -- not the surgeon. When asked what she most wanted to see first after her surgery, she said: a picture of Kim Jong-il. --not her children or her grandchildren.


Every verb applied as a predicate to God in typical Christian prayers has the intent to manipulate the invented/perceived God entity.

And people who speak or think such prayers have as their intent to control and hence to manipulate the God to whom they pray.

Otherwise: Why pray?

Prayer would be pointless were it not intended to manipulate the entity to whom the prayer was directed.

Otherwise: Why pray?

Look again at the verbs in the examples restated here.

Your attempt to restrict manipulation as pejorative only, is a misrepresentation of the larger context of the term itself. The context of use is critical to the understanding of meaning in the context of the use.

The word “influence” is also a good word. See some synonyms of that word:

Influence Part of Speech: noun Definition: authority Synonyms: access, agency, ascendancy, character, clout, command, connections, consequence, control, credit, direction, domination, dominion, drag, effect, esteem, fame, fix, force, grease*, guidance, hold, impact, importance, imprint, in, juice*, leadership, leverage, magnetism, mark, mastery, moment, money, monopoly, network, notoriety, power, predominance, prerogative, pressure, prestige, prominence, pull, repercussion, reputation, ropes*, rule, significance, spell, string, supremacy, sway, weight*

Prayer has the intention to influence. Inclusive in that is to “control,” to “force,” to “impact” to “pressure” etc.

Unless you are prepared to refute all the above examples of what prayer attempts, you have no refutation to the analysis:

Prayer is an attempt to manipulate God’s behavior to benefit one’s self or those one wants to have benefit as a result of prayer.

Hence to manipulate is exactly the correct analysis of what people intend when they pray. It does not need to be harmful or “devious” as you suggest to be an attempt to manipulate. That is far too restrictive on the word “manipulate” for the scope of the term. It’s not a term which has only pejorative connotation.

Manipulate -- to control, to direct, to maneuver

These are quite useful synonyms. The word “manipulate” is quite related to context of application. The verbs I listed previously and restate here are examples.

When a 4-year old does not want to eat his vegetables, we say, “After you eat your vegetables, you can have some brownies.” O.K? That’s manipulative. It’s not harmful or harmfully devious. Of course, this is an example to illustrate the error in restricting to manipulate as negative only. People are often manipulated for their own good. We do the same for very elderly or cognitively impaired as we manipulate them to eat, go to bed, take a shower, etc.

The intent in prayer is to influence, persuade, manipulate, bribe a perceived God to give, to give what someone wants.

Review the verbs above as examples of prayer.

I recently was in a group in which a preacher prayed with a family before a serious surgery. The preacher had an interesting use of the word “just.”

In his prayer, he said: We just ask dear Lord that you guide the surgeon’s hand to save the life of our mother..

I thought this an interesting down-play or groveling in expression.

Interpretation: We don’t ask much. We just ask (compliment and term of endearment) “dear Lord” (then the attempt to manipulate) “that you guide the surgeon’s hand to save the life...” (we don’t ask much, just a little) as in save our mother. This was not save for heaven, this was save for us NOW. Control the surgeon’s hand, God.

Then when it was over and the surgery was successful, did the surgeon’s training and skill receive credit? No, God received credit and the same preacher thanked God for the successful surgery.

There is not the slightest question that the prayer was the preacher’s attempt to manipulate God. But “we just ask” -- as if we don’t ask for much.

It would have been just as effective (meaning no effect what so ever) if the preacher had said: God, we want you to pull out all the stops on this one and do whatever you have to do to save mother!

The prayer was irrelevant. The surgeon’s skill and training were.
But I have digressed into the irrelevancy of God myths -- related but another topic for discussion.

JAK
_marg

Re: Attempts to Manipulate God

Post by _marg »

What I really appreciate about your posts JAK is your precise use of language. I think Jersey Girl misread dictionary definitions as saying that manipulation must include deviousness..which is not the case, obviously. by the way, Harmony was the one who mentioned an illustration with a grandson I believe., not that that is important for the thrust of the discussion.

I've been meaning to write you but have been way too consumed with reading stuff on the Rigdon-Spalding theory to the detriment of ignoring other responsibilites. I'll get back on track tomorrow.
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

JAK,

As I stated previously, feel free to post any formal definition of manipulate/manipulation from any dictionary of your choosing and I'll consider it.

Jersey Girl
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_marg

Post by _marg »

Jersey Girl wrote:JAK,

As I stated previously, feel free to post any formal definition of manipulate/manipulation from any dictionary of your choosing and I'll consider it.

Jersey Girl


http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define. ... &dict=CALD

Cambridge dictionary:

Definition
manipulate (INFLUENCE)
verb [T] MAINLY DISAPPROVING
to control something or someone to your advantage, often unfairly or dishonestly:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note the underlining I put in to highlight .."mainly" and "often"..which do not imply "always".

JAK pointed out that the meaning of a word is determined by the context within which it is put. The context in which he used the word manipulate was not to imply devious. He gave other examples of use of word manipulate in contexts which illustrated "devious" was not intended. When a 4-year old does not want to eat his vegetables, we say, “After you eat your vegetables, you can have some brownies.” O.K? That’s manipulative. It’s not harmful or harmfully devious. Of course, this is an example to illustrate the error in restricting to manipulate as negative only. People are often manipulated for their own good. We do the same for very elderly or cognitively impaired as we manipulate them to eat, go to bed, take a shower, etc.
_Roger Morrison
_Emeritus
Posts: 1831
Joined: Sat Nov 11, 2006 4:13 am

Post by _Roger Morrison »

Do "prayers" work? Does "God" intervene? I think in these questions we are using 'generic' terms, 'rhetorically'--so-to-speak ;-)

Both terms, "prayer" and "God" have been used for a looonnnnggg time by both religious & nonreligious types... Some of the meanings traditionally attached to "prayer", as i've observed are more hopeful and/or wishful than promisary, definitly assured, or guaranteed... Some what similar to profanity and coloquialisms that fill gaps in conversations and vocabularies. Many times used with emotion as expressions of frustration, uncertainty and anxiety...

Does this mean concentration, visualization, meditation (and deep breathing:-) are not effective? No, because they do work--sometimes.

In reality, IF "prayer" was directed, not to "God" via the Prayer-box, but to the 'person' needing strength, understanding, support, comfort etc, as an energy/love flow from the concerned to the sufferer, it might be more sustaining and directly effective, as spirits/psyches link in ways we have yet to fully understand...

When humanity understands THEY, not "God" are responsible for pain AND healing, problems AND solutions, then, and only then, will Peace-prayers, and such be answered positively. Could be our faith would be better placed in ourselves than in "God"... Warm regards, Roger
_JAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1593
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:04 pm

A Matter of Understanding

Post by _JAK »

marg wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:JAK,

As I stated previously, feel free to post any formal definition of manipulate/manipulation from any dictionary of your choosing and I'll consider it.

Jersey Girl


http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define. ... &dict=CALD

Cambridge dictionary:

Definition
manipulate (INFLUENCE)
verb [T] MAINLY DISAPPROVING
to control something or someone to your advantage, often unfairly or dishonestly:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note the underlining I put in to highlight .."mainly" and "often"..which do not imply "always".

JAK pointed out that the meaning of a word is determined by the context within which it is put. The context in which he used the word manipulate was not to imply devious. He gave other examples of use of word manipulate in contexts which illustrated "devious" was not intended. When a 4-year old does not want to eat his vegetables, we say, “After you eat your vegetables, you can have some brownies.” O.K? That’s manipulative. It’s not harmful or harmfully devious. Of course, this is an example to illustrate the error in restricting to manipulate as negative only. People are often manipulated for their own good. We do the same for very elderly or cognitively impaired as we manipulate them to eat, go to bed, take a shower, etc.


Thank you, marg, for your re-enforcement of what I stated and what I intended. Your analysis is correct. Genuine intent to communicate requires that participants read with context in mind. It’s easy to distort by various techniques of faulty reading. Sometimes it’s innocent -- sometimes not.

JAK
_JAK
_Emeritus
Posts: 1593
Joined: Sun Jan 14, 2007 4:04 pm

More on Prayer Superstitions

Post by _JAK »

marg wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:JAK,

As I stated previously, feel free to post any formal definition of manipulate/manipulation from any dictionary of your choosing and I'll consider it.

Jersey Girl


http://dictionary.cambridge.org/define. ... &dict=CALD

Cambridge dictionary:

Definition
manipulate (INFLUENCE)
verb [T] MAINLY DISAPPROVING
to control something or someone to your advantage, often unfairly or dishonestly:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note the underlining I put in to highlight .."mainly" and "often"..which do not imply "always".

JAK pointed out that the meaning of a word is determined by the context within which it is put. The context in which he used the word manipulate was not to imply devious. He gave other examples of use of word manipulate in contexts which illustrated "devious" was not intended. When a 4-year old does not want to eat his vegetables, we say, “After you eat your vegetables, you can have some brownies.” O.K? That’s manipulative. It’s not harmful or harmfully devious. Of course, this is an example to illustrate the error in restricting to manipulate as negative only. People are often manipulated for their own good. We do the same for very elderly or cognitively impaired as we manipulate them to eat, go to bed, take a shower, etc.


The particular definitions which you cite in your post allow for expansion of interpretation.

Definition
manipulate (INFLUENCE)
verb [T] MAINLY DISAPPROVING
to control something or someone to your advantage, often unfairly or dishonestly:


Critical in your cited definition is INFLUENCE. The intent for prayer is clearly to influence.

As I asked previously: Why pray? In a previous example, people don’t “pray” that the light will come on when the switch is turned “on.” They expect the light to come on. They have little/no doubt the light will come on (or the TV or the car starting or the toaster toasting or the washer or dryer working). Generally, people don’t pray for any of those things. So what do they pray for? They pray for events which are in doubt -- even serious doubt. Life at great risk of death tends to produce prayer.

Hence, people pray for that which is in considerable doubt. The light switch is not in considerable doubt. --Hence no prayer.

The attempt to influence God is made when considerable doubt is the reality of the situation.

At the same time, people do pray for the things likely. For example: Bless this food to the strengthening of our bodies.

Such example demonstrates the irrelevance of prayer. If people in good health eat food, that food will “strengthen” their bodies. So, there are prayers for obvious certainty as well as prayers for that which is clearly uncertain and, in fact, in grave doubt.

A prayer before eating “for the strengthening of our bodies” is a prayer for what is going to happen. Prayer is irrelevant. Prayer for the marginal -- a cure of cancer or prevention of death in a 95 year-old ill person is equally irrelevant.

While such expressions may make individuals feel good, there is no objective evidence that any God is influenced to alter the situation.

However, on subject of intent to manipulate God, the appeals and verbs typical in such prayers are clearly transparent.

Otherwise, why “talk” to God at all?

People want to believe someone is in charge. At the same time, they want to believe they have the capacity to maneuver, manipulate, and influence that same God. It’s clearly a reflection of ancient culture and perception.

JAK
Post Reply