DCP Takes Aim at Everybody Wang Chung

[Flemming]

Chung could just email or telephone Dan and resolve this, you know, the proper way. Why does he not do that?

Why do you care?

Why don’t you?

[Gadianton]

Didn’t his education do him any good? And doesn’t this prove that he doesn’t do his research?

The apologist's operate within the ultimate catch-22.

On the one hand, you've got to project power and convince people that you know it all.

But on the other hand, you've got to be able to claim deniability if things go south.

This episode is one of many similar episodes even if the content of the episode is different.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Why do you care?

Why don’t you?

Because I don’t have skin in the game. Why do you care?

[Flemming]

Why don’t you?

Because I don’t have skin in the game. Why do you care?

I dunno. I just wish humans were better to each other.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Because I don’t have skin in the game. Why do you care?

I dunno. I just wish humans were better to each other.

Are you going to take DCP et al to task over at Sic et Non?

- Doc

[Flemming]

I dunno. I just wish humans were better to each other.

Are you going to take DCP et al to task over at Sic et Non?

- Doc

Does he have Chug’s contact information?

[Marcus]

Are you going to take DCP et al to task over at Sic et Non?

- Doc

Does he have Chug’s contact information?

What's the point of your question? Did you not read Everybody Wang Chung's earlier post?

... DCP will go to any length to dox me, including breaking several state and federal privacy laws, which he did.

In addition to my friend, just look at a few of the many other people he has publicly attacked and hurt their families in the process. Gerald Bradford, anyone? Blair Hodges? Michael Quinn? Bill Reel? John Dehlin, etc.

I shared my friend's identity with, and told Dr. Shades personal details surrounding DCP's multi-year campaign against my friend. Now, DCP wants to know the identity in an effort to punish my friend and his family even further, and to try to dox me? What an idiot...

[Kishkumen]

Correction: not “one LDS apologist” the chief LDS apologist, the primary apologist talked about on this board, the most prolific LDS apologist has used his real identity for 20 years.

That means tapir hasn’t been following things very closely.

No, it means that you are not privy to the history around here. Others have alluded to it. You aren’t interested. You are here for DCP, it seems.

[Kishkumen]

Reminds me of one of my companions who on a door approach said the Book of Mormon is true, I have not read it yet, but the Spirit has testified to me it's true. I left, pulling him with me by his collar. And yes, I really DID make him sit down and read it all the way through with me for the next three weeks.

Good for you! Kids. To think they let them go even younger now.

[Dr. Shades]

I love your sense of humor. LOVE IT!

Can you explain that witticism for us folks who don’t think Moksha is funny? I really want to understand it in order to perhaps broaden my taste in obscure and unattainable comedy.

- Doc

I, too, respectfully request that you explain that witticism, ‘cause I sure ain’t seeing it, either.