It is a point of conflict with me. You specifically said two physicists use the same tools to arrive at different conclusions and then labeled one as unwilling to change.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 5:42 pmI think there are those that refer to him as a "mathematical physicist". True, he is not a classical physicist and/or trained in that discipline. If this is a point of conflict for you, so be it.Everybody Wang Chung wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 2:13 pm
Did you really say Weinstein is a physicist? Why all the constant lying?
Regards,
MG
Created???
- Rivendale
- God
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:21 pm
Re: Created???
-
- God
- Posts: 5438
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Created???
- Rivendale
- God
- Posts: 1448
- Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:21 pm
Re: Created???
Did you intentionally lie?
-
- God
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: Created???
No, you’re actively seeking to subvert and make a mockery of the restrictions newly put in place. Stop it.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 5:40 pmI'm having to operate under the restrictions put in place by the board administrator.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 6:10 amSo instead of spamming threads with walls of A.I. text, MG is now spamming threads by directing people to walls of A.I. text that he’s posted on the one thread where it’s allowed.
You simply cannot make this up!
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
-
- God
- Posts: 5438
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Created???
Of course not. I hadn't even heard of this Weinstein fellow before watching the Piers Morgan interview. You've got to remember, Rivendale, I'm just a regular guy. I'm not like you...with all your fancy degrees (assuming this is the case). I just have one, and it's in Education. Some folks might not even entertain that as being a real degree. I get it.
I don't live in the Ivory Tower...and never wanted to. Nothing against those that do, however.

But I do like to learn. I'm a lifelong learner.
I appreciate the correction in regards to this fellow, Weinstein. One thing I think we can agree on, they really got into the weeds. I was completely lost here and there with the jargon and names. Whew!
I am a subscriber to Mindscape, Carroll's podcast. Fun stuff.
Regards,
MG
-
- God
- Posts: 5438
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Created???
I will continue to do what I'm doing...knowing that it actually adds to the discussions rather than taking away. What does take away from the discussions is when you are continually bellyaching.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 8:36 pmNo, you’re actively seeking to subvert and make a mockery of the restrictions newly put in place. Stop it.
Stop it.
If you are either unwilling or fearful of "more information rather than less" DON"T CLICK ON THE A.I. LINKS!!
That simple.
At this point I'd say you've done a pretty good job at a derail.
Let's move on, shall we?
Regards,
MG
-
- God
- Posts: 1903
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: Created???
What about “do not link and run” are you struggling to understand?MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 8:42 pmI will continue to do what I'm doing...knowing that it actually adds to the discussions rather than taking away. What does take away from the discussions is when you are continually bellyaching.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 8:36 pmNo, you’re actively seeking to subvert and make a mockery of the restrictions newly put in place. Stop it.
Stop it.
If you are either unwilling or fearful of "more information rather than less" DON"T CLICK ON THE A.I. LINKS!!
That simple.
At this point I'd say you've done a pretty good job at a derail.
Let's move on, shall we?
Regards,
MG
“ Do not EVER "link-and-run." If you post a link to something, always explain what's at the other end of the link, why it's important, and what you hope other readers / viewers learn from it. RULE OF THUMB: If it's not worth your time to describe it, then it's not worth our time to click on it.”
Last edited by I Have Questions on Fri May 30, 2025 8:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
-
- God
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm
Re: Created???
This is a pleasant and honest post.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 8:38 pmOf course not. I hadn't even heard of this Weinstein fellow before watching the Piers Morgan interview. You've got to remember, Rivendale, I'm just a regular guy. I'm not like you...with all your fancy degrees (assuming this is the case). I just have one, and it's in Education. Some folks might not even entertain that as being a real degree. I get it.
I don't live in the Ivory Tower...and never wanted to. Nothing against those that do, however.![]()
But I do like to learn. I'm a lifelong learner.
I appreciate the correction in regards to this fellow, Weinstein. One thing I think we can agree on, they really got into the weeds. I was completely lost here and there with the jargon and names. Whew!
I am a subscriber to Mindscape, Carroll's podcast. Fun stuff.
Regards,
MG
-
- God
- Posts: 3385
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm
Re: Created???
I guess if there is a shortage of interest then one can always complain about MG. It is not just MG who sidetracks discussion to the subject of MG.
Last edited by huckelberry on Sat May 31, 2025 4:22 am, edited 2 times in total.
-
- God
- Posts: 5438
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Created???
Well thanks, huckelberry! I don't think it is anything out of the ordinary though. I try to add to the conversations. Sometimes further information helps, however. Thus the links to a source for that information. I find it useful and hope others do. If not, don't click!!huckelberry wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 8:45 pmThis is a pleasant and honest post.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Fri May 30, 2025 8:38 pmOf course not. I hadn't even heard of this Weinstein fellow before watching the Piers Morgan interview. You've got to remember, Rivendale, I'm just a regular guy. I'm not like you...with all your fancy degrees (assuming this is the case). I just have one, and it's in Education. Some folks might not even entertain that as being a real degree. I get it.
I don't live in the Ivory Tower...and never wanted to. Nothing against those that do, however.![]()
But I do like to learn. I'm a lifelong learner.
I appreciate the correction in regards to this fellow, Weinstein. One thing I think we can agree on, they really got into the weeds. I was completely lost here and there with the jargon and names. Whew!
I am a subscriber to Mindscape, Carroll's podcast. Fun stuff.
Regards,
MG
Thanks again for your kind words. They are at a premium around here at times.

Regards,
MG
Last edited by MG 2.0 on Fri May 30, 2025 9:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.