Making Covenants

[Marcus]

When you get into double digit pages, be sure to share.

I may do that! Thanks for taking a continued interest.

You know, you could just read the book.

So could you.

[MG 2.0]

Will you retract this and apologize?

In the picture I recently provided are you now going to say that the thumb which you see is not mine?

Like I said, the book was a gift I received at Christmas.

Regards,
MG

You still haven't posted those quotes from the book you claim is in your possession that have led you to those 3 "new" thoughts about covenants. Shouldn't be difficult as it's right there in front of you. Waiting...

Yes I did.

I’m waiting for you to accept that you were in error.

canpakes is a witness to my thumb.

Waiting…

But not holding my breath…

Regards,
MG

[MG 2.0]

You haven’t got the book and you haven’t read any more than what is freely available. Stop being cheap. Buy the book, actually read it, it is your thread after all…

Will you retract this and apologize?

In the picture I recently provided are you now going to say that the thumb which you see is not mine?

Like I said, the book was a gift I received at Christmas.

Regards,
MG

Waiting…

Regards,
MG

[MG 2.0]

I may do that! Thanks for taking a continued interest.

You know, you could just read the book.

So could you.

Working on it…

Thanks.

Regards,
MG

[IHAQ]

You still haven't posted those quotes from the book you claim is in your possession that have led you to those 3 "new" thoughts about covenants. Shouldn't be difficult as it's right there in front of you. Waiting...

Yes I did.

Where?

[MG 2.0]

Yes I did.

Where?

Remember, “new” includes something that triggers thoughts that one hasn’t had in the same way as at other times. Those thoughts can then trigger other thoughts as one continues to think upon original statements and/or presentation.

You do read, right?

I listed the first three interesting ‘twists’ on covenants that I’ve come across thus far. I expect I will come upon others.

Anyway, do you now believe that I actually own the book?

If so, you owe an me an apology for insinuating I was lying. You are in good (bad?) company with Doc on this point.

Critics. Meh.

Regards,
MG

[MG 2.0]

You haven’t got the book and you haven’t read any more than what is freely available. Stop being cheap. Buy the book, actually read it, it is your thread after all…

Will you retract this and apologize?

In the picture I recently provided are you now going to say that the thumb which you see is not mine?

Like I said, the book was a gift I received at Christmas.

Regards,
MG

Waiting…

Waiting…

Regards,
MG

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

And yet, the shill just spams away. Week after week, despite the master classes that have been afforded him here. He doesn’t read. He doesn’t care. He just blithely scrolls past posts, and repeats himself like the dumb damned muppet he is.

- Doc

Here is the actual context of something Doc said earlier. Everything he said is a lie and innuendo.

Regards,
MG

Once again, MG blithely ignores what’s been written dozens of times:

He’s a morgbot through and through, and if there’s one they absolutely 100% refuse to do is actually read something longer than a few sentences.

You do good in little spats consisting of a few sentences. Anything longer and you skim it, or scroll past it. This is why people have, over time, limited their responses to you - because you don’t read, caveat above aside. Plus, you’ve been caught in so many lies ref book reading, or linking academic papers you claimed to have read, or church resources you claimed to have read, but actually they contradicted your claims, or that you’ve studied religions and philosophies while being as ignorant of them as one can be. You’re literally one of the most dishonest people I have ever known of in my life. Which. You know. Is par for the damned course when it comes to Mormons, frankly.

- Doc

[IHAQ]

Where?

Remember, “new” includes something that triggers thoughts that one hasn’t had in the same way as at other times. Those thoughts can then trigger other thoughts as one continues to think upon original statements and/or presentation.

You do read, right?

I listed the first three interesting ‘twists’ on covenants that I’ve come across thus far. I expect I will come upon others.

Anyway, do you now believe that I actually own the book?

If so, you owe an me an apology for insinuating I was lying. You are in good (bad?) company with Doc on this point.

Critics. Meh.

Regards,
MG

I asked you to post some supporting quotes from the book for those “new ideas” you’ve had on covenants that weren’t included in the free sample on Amazon. You didn’t provide any. You said you had. I asked you to show me where. You pointed to your three thoughts on covenants, not any quotes from the book.

Why can’t you provide them when the book is right there in front of you? Why do you repeatedly say you’ve provided quotes, but when asked where they are, just refer back to your own words posted upthread? What’s wrong with you?

[MG 2.0]

MG blithely ignores what’s been written dozens of times:

He’s a morgbot through and through, and if there’s one they absolutely 100% refuse to do is actually read something longer than a few sentences.

Written dozens of times doesn’t make it as a matter of fact true.

I would like you to please show the original post in full in which this sentence is found. Context, as I’ve said many times, is important.

You are pulling something out of context that may have not even been said about me in particular. In fact, you could have pulled it out of your butt.

It would be interesting also to see (if indeed this statement is shown to be directed at me) who wrote it. If it was you, for example, there would be some, including me of course, that would take it as a grain of salt.

Thanks in advance.

Regards,
MG