Epic Mormonism Live on Rosebud Accusations

[Kukulkan]

Have you all ever seen her youtube channel?

Do share.

[Jersey Girl]

Have you all ever seen her youtube channel?

Do share.

See? You people ain't got nothing on me. Let me go find the link. It's a counseling venture that looks like it fell flat on it's face. But I'm only going by what I see on the channel.

[Kishkumen]

And that is not limited to a start up venture. The thing that I keep coming back to is that they mutually decided to work together when romantic ties were already in place beforehand. I guess that is my main sticking point here and I am not sure how to get past that.

Yep. Her documents revealed the early stages of the relationship, making it clear the romance preceded her hiring. That makes the whole situation a lot murkier.

[Moksha]

I think the record shows Rosebud got fired because she continued to ask for a sexual and romantic relationship after JD refused.

If Rosebud had ceased and desisted as JD asked, there is no reason to suspect the board would ever have gotten involved.

You are basing your findings on the evidence. The rest of us prefer to jumble things up with personal misunderstandings and the pretzelized logic we have learned from apologetics. How do you stay so focused?

[Kukulkan]

I think the record shows Rosebud got fired because she continued to ask for a sexual and romantic relationship after JD refused.

If Rosebud had ceased and desisted as JD asked, there is no reason to suspect the board would ever have gotten involved.

You are basing your findings on the evidence. The rest of us prefer to jumble things up with personal misunderstandings and the pretzelized logic we have learned from apologetics. How do you stay so focused?

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Documentation has all been removed from Rosebud's website, citing redaction errors, including the fact that JD's wife's name was not redacted.

And she still manages to act like a victim while throwing her “volunteers” under the bus.

- Doc

[Jersey Girl]

So. You can find this by YouTube searching her knowable first and last name. It's a public channel. I am confident that this is her. Her name appeared on the previous version of MDB on a GFM she set up to raise funds for the board, her first and middle(?) name appears in the not-fully-redacted documents she herself posted to her website when I read them. Her Facebook and it's photos, are likewise set to public and her fundraisers tie her to her own identity.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfoWQR ... yXg/videos

[Jersey Girl]

And that is not limited to a start up venture. The thing that I keep coming back to is that they mutually decided to work together when romantic ties were already in place beforehand. I guess that is my main sticking point here and I am not sure how to get past that.

Yep. Her documents revealed the early stages of the relationship, making it clear the romance preceded her hiring. That makes the whole situation a lot murkier.

Since the very beginning my thoughts were always to the effect...you plays the game, you takes your chances. I don't know how to get past that point but I do try.

[Kukulkan]

So. You can find this by YouTube searching her knowable first and last name. It's a public channel. I am confident that this is her. Her name appeared on the previous version of MDB on a GFM she set up to raise funds for the board, her first and middle(?) name appears in the not-fully-redacted documents she herself posted to her website when I read them. Her Facebook and it's photos, are likewise set to public.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfoWQR ... yXg/videos

Just from a quick glance it looks like an honest endeavor. Good for her. She does seem like a person that wants to help others, so it is good to see she has found a medium to do so.

[pistolero]

So. You can find this by YouTube searching her knowable first and last name. It's a public channel. I am confident that this is her. Her name appeared on the previous version of MDB on a GFM she set up to raise funds for the board, her first and middle(?) name appears in the not-fully-redacted documents she herself posted to her website when I read them. Her Facebook and it's photos, are likewise set to public.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfoWQR ... yXg/videos

If interest in this topic is anything to go, her number of views is going to go through the roof. If she monetises, that will pay for college for the kids.

This must be her. The topic of the videos on the channel are basically related to some of the problems she shares regarding her marriage. She seems confident that she is knowledgeable on this.

She has an online class on udemy too on the same topic.