DCP Takes Aim at Everybody Wang Chung

[drumdude]

Again… it wasn’t.

It wasn’t; “Flemming” is a gigantic stupid Mormon yokel. He came here so he could earn some good boy points from Dorkenpork.

You know, Flemming, I’m surprised you show your face in these parts - you’d thinks after your last embarrassment you’d be careful around here. Guess ya wanna make Scratch’s top 10.

- Doc

Daniel Peterson’s personal Danite.

[Tapir Rodeo]

To be clear, I support anonymity. That’s why tapir’s comment was so … cognitively challenged.

Everyone who commented about it understood and essentially agreed with what I was saying, except you.

If you say that A makes someone a coward but then you do A and refuse the label of coward you are a hypocrite. It's not complicated.

[Flemming]

If you say that A makes someone a coward but then you do A and refuse the label of coward you are a hypocrite. It's not complicated.

Yes but in this case, the number one apologist and target for this discussion board, Dan, does not do A.

[drumdude]

If you say that A makes someone a coward but then you do A and refuse the label of coward you are a hypocrite. It's not complicated.

Yes but in this case, the number one apologist and target for this discussion board, Dan, does not do A.

Yeah, it’s just his friends that do.

[Tapir Rodeo]

If you say that A makes someone a coward but then you do A and refuse the label of coward you are a hypocrite. It's not complicated.

Yes but in this case, the number one apologist and target for this discussion board, Dan, does not do A.

That is irrelevant and not really true because:

1) I was talking about mopologetics broadly. There are plenty of examples of the hypocrisy I described.

2) Dan does protect the anonymity of other Mopologists while calling anonymous critics cowards. He also harasses and defames critics who chose to use their real name and he supports other Mopologists who doxx people. When critics doxx or abuse him or his Mopologist friends he complains about it. That's hypocritical.

[Flemming]

2) Dan does protect the anonymity of other Mopologists while calling anonymous critics cowards.

Is it his job to doxx them? What would you like to see here?

He also harasses and defames critics who chose to use their real name and he supports other Mopologists who doxx people.

I’m fairly new to the Danosphere, but I’ve never seen him do this. Do you have a example?

When critics doxx or abuse him or his Mopologist friends he complains about it. That's hypocritical.

You can’t doxx Dan when his identity is already known (by his choice). I think doxxing in general is a form of bullying and I definitely do not support it at all. So, I would complain about someone being doxxed as well, wouldn’t you?

[Marcus]

2) Dan does protect the anonymity of other Mopologists while calling anonymous critics cowards.

Is it his job to doxx them? What would you like to see here?

He also harasses and defames critics who chose to use their real name and he supports other Mopologists who doxx people.

I’m fairly new to the Danosphere, but I’ve never seen him do this. Do you have a example?

When critics doxx or abuse him or his Mopologist friends he complains about it. That's hypocritical.

You can’t doxx Dan when his identity is already known (by his choice). I think doxxing in general is a form of bullying and I definitely do not support it at all. So, I would complain about someone being doxxed as well, wouldn’t you?

You would? After I documented Peterson's plagiarism, he heard from a very unreliable source (smoky, a neo-nazi supporter who trolled here), who Smoky thought I was. He immediately posted her name, the university at which she taught, and her department. He was wrong, and eventually retracted his accusation, but when he thought it was correct, he was happy to doxx me.

And why? Because, as he stated, documenting his plagiarism was an "attack" on him. His clear implication was that people should attack me.

So, what do you think about Peterson's attempt to doxx me?

[Tapir Rodeo]

Is it his job to doxx them? What would you like to see here?

I’m fairly new to the Danosphere, but I’ve never seen him do this. Do you have a example?

You can’t doxx Dan when his identity is already known (by his choice). I think doxxing in general is a form of bullying and I definitely do not support it at all. So, I would complain about someone being doxxed as well, wouldn’t you?

I would like to see him stop being a hypocrite by calling anonymous critics cowards while protecting the identity of anonymous mopologists.

Marcus provided an example. Dan supports people like Robert Boylan, Stephen Smoot, and Mike Parker who all have a history of doxxing and harassment.

It's hypocrical to complain about it when he supports people who do it and he does it himself. Even if someone isn't anonymous you can still doxx them by finding out and posting other personal information people might not want posted in hostile spaces.

[Flemming]

And why? Because, as he stated, documenting his plagiarism was an "attack" on him. His clear implication was that people should attack me.

So, what do you think about Peterson's attempt to doxx me?

If your story is true, of course I don’t like it at all.

[canpakes]

If your story is true, …

The story is true.

Unfortunately, I don’t keep a direct link to that blog entry and its comments, but Marcus may have that.