The thing would have died had he lived longer, I believe. He was going in many different directions and his religion was becoming more and more fractious prior to his death. Having a martyr and moving the group west acted as a catalyst to keep the group going. They were out in the desert and the rest of the US population couldn't attack their ideas or practices with enough vigor to shut the movement down like probably would have happened if our ancestors had stayed in Illinois. Circumstance, geography and perhaps the civil war that kept the rest of the country occupied while polygamy flourished in the motherland fatherland allowed the nonsense to continue and grow to where it was too big to snuff out or absorb into the rest of Christianity.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Sun Jun 29, 2025 2:01 amThat makes sense. Obviously that same thing holds true today in regards to Joseph Smith. Otherwise we'd have a lot more Mormons.Gadianton wrote: ↑Sat Jun 28, 2025 9:41 pm
The closest I can see myself referring to anyone as a prophet is in the context of the religion's beliefs -- "Moses was a prophet of the Israelites". I didn't mention that use in my list because that's not actually me recognizing Moses as a prophet. That's recognizing followers of Moses believe in an X and Moses fills the role of X according to those people.
One thing I've always found interesting is that Joseph Smith wasn't considered to be a prophet because of "merit" in the worldly sense. Degrees, education, stellar moral example, ability to be the 'spokesman' for the church, etc.
Most people, believers or not, would agree that in the case of Joseph Smith...he was one of the 'weak things of the world'. Interestingly, however, he was magnified many times over because of the faith and obedience that he exercised as he moved forward believing he was doing the will of the Lord.
He went from farm boy to a prophet who led a movement that resulted in a church that makes some pretty dang explosive truth claims.
It's amazing, to say the least.
Regards,
MG
Formal Mormon Theology
-
- God
- Posts: 2167
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:40 pm
Re: Formal Mormon Theology
Myth is misused by the powerful to subjugate the masses all too often.
-
- God
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: Formal Mormon Theology
When, specifically, was he made a Prophet, and by whom? From the research I’ve done he was self-appointed (just like David Koresh etc)
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
-
- God
- Posts: 5716
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Formal Mormon Theology
Jesus. First Vision.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Sun Jun 29, 2025 8:26 amWhen, specifically, was he made a Prophet, and by whom? From the research I’ve done he was self-appointed (just like David Koresh etc)
He was told that he had a work for him to perform, inasmuch as he should prove faithful before him.
Regards,
MG
- Moksha
- God
- Posts: 7970
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
- Location: Koloburbia
Re: Formal Mormon Theology
Can you see Joseph's preaching encouraging his disciples to murder a wagon train full of immigrants to California, like with Brigham? I can see Joseph having a hankering for some of the women, especially any teenagers, but not a full-scale massacre.Dr Exiled wrote: ↑Sun Jun 29, 2025 2:55 amThe thing would have died had he lived longer, I believe. He was going in many different directions and his religion was becoming more and more fractious prior to his death. Having a martyr and moving the group west acted as a catalyst to keep the group going. They were out in the desert and the rest of the US population couldn't attack their ideas or practices with enough vigor to shut the movement down like probably would have happened if our ancestors had stayed in Illinois. Circumstance, geography and perhaps the civil war that kept the rest of the country occupied while polygamy flourished in the motherland fatherland allowed the nonsense to continue and grow to where it was too big to snuff out or absorb into the rest of Christianity.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
-
- God
- Posts: 2097
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: Formal Mormon Theology
Sorry, just for clarity, which version of the First Vision are we talking about? The initial memory, or the one that came years later when Joseph was losing momentum and needed a miraculous story to bolster his reputation?MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 30, 2025 3:36 amJesus. First Vision.I Have Questions wrote: ↑Sun Jun 29, 2025 8:26 amWhen, specifically, was he made a Prophet, and by whom? From the research I’ve done he was self-appointed (just like David Koresh etc)
He was told that he had a work for him to perform, inasmuch as he should prove faithful before him.
Regards,
MG
For reference - none of the vision stories amount to Joseph being called as a Prophet.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
-
- God
- Posts: 5716
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: Formal Mormon Theology
He was told that he had a work to do and that the gospel would be restored through him. He was referred to as "the prophet" before 1830 but it might be helpful to remember that this wasn't the title bestowed upon him as his official title. It was, "President of the High Priesthood". The First Vision was the focal point that initiated events in which he was referred to as "the prophet".I Have Questions wrote: ↑Mon Jun 30, 2025 9:15 amSorry, just for clarity, which version of the First Vision are we talking about? The initial memory, or the one that came years later when Joseph was losing momentum and needed a miraculous story to bolster his reputation?
For reference - none of the vision stories amount to Joseph being called as a Prophet.
Regards,“If you start a church with a prophet in it everybody will be against you,” Smith’s friend W.W. Phelps wrote ruefully in 1835. People had been calling Joseph Smith a prophet since before he organized his church in April of 1830, and the revelation that he presented to the group of people there that day claimed the title. “Behold there Shall a Record be kept among you & in it thou shalt be called a seer & Translater & Prop[h]et,” it said. They voted to accept this statement as the word of God.
But soon Smith reached for another title too. In November 1831, he dictated a revelation that now comprises the latter half of the current section 107 in the Doctrine and Covenants. Several passages near the beginning of that revelation (now versus 64-66) delineate that office.
“Wherefore, it must needs be that one be appointed of the High Priesthood to preside over the priesthood, and he shall be called President of the High Priesthood of the Church; or, in other words, the Presiding High Priest over the High Priesthood of the Church.”
https://www.wayfaremagazine.org/p/the-p ... the-priest
MG
- Everybody Wang Chung
- God
- Posts: 2683
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:52 am
Re: Formal Mormon Theology
I Have Questions wrote: ↑Mon Jun 30, 2025 9:15 amSorry, just for clarity, which version of the First Vision are we talking about? The initial memory, or the one that came years later when Joseph was losing momentum and needed a miraculous story to bolster his reputation?
For reference - none of the vision stories amount to Joseph being called as a Prophet.
It's painfully obvious that MG doesn't know anything about church history.
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."
Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
-
- God
- Posts: 2167
- Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2020 2:40 pm
Re: Formal Mormon Theology
That's a good point. Joseph Smith was a lover, and only fought when parents objected to his firm "revelations." BY was a precursor to the paranoia Stalin exhibited and of course loved genocides. Do your duty elder .... anyway, I recently took my oldest son to Mountain Meadows after a baseball tournament in Cedar City. I don't know if it's because of what I know but the place still seems creepy. My son even commented about the still silence of the area. I'm not proud of my family relationship to the bearded dictator.Moksha wrote: ↑Mon Jun 30, 2025 3:45 amCan you see Joseph's preaching encouraging his disciples to murder a wagon train full of immigrants to California, like with Brigham? I can see Joseph having a hankering for some of the women, especially any teenagers, but not a full-scale massacre.Dr Exiled wrote: ↑Sun Jun 29, 2025 2:55 amThe thing would have died had he lived longer, I believe. He was going in many different directions and his religion was becoming more and more fractious prior to his death. Having a martyr and moving the group west acted as a catalyst to keep the group going. They were out in the desert and the rest of the US population couldn't attack their ideas or practices with enough vigor to shut the movement down like probably would have happened if our ancestors had stayed in Illinois. Circumstance, geography and perhaps the civil war that kept the rest of the country occupied while polygamy flourished in the motherland fatherland allowed the nonsense to continue and grow to where it was too big to snuff out or absorb into the rest of Christianity.
Myth is misused by the powerful to subjugate the masses all too often.