liz3564 wrote:Daniel Peterson wrote:Ah yes. I'd forgotten. There was indeed the matter of that young man. Very sad. Well, believe me, the young man hadn't told the stake president anything. He couldn't have. And Quinn hadn't, either. No confidentiality had been breached. It was a public matter, well known to the community.
And that's all you're getting from me. I've got places to go, and people to smear.
Have fun!
Dr. Peterson, I really don't understand why you decided to top this thread. It had been dead for a while.
You already made it quite clear that you didn't want to engage Scratch anymore. You have also implied that you believe Rollo and Scratch to be the same poster.
If you honestly don't want to engage Scratch, then why top the thread? He was the initiator of the thread to begin with.
It seems like you're continuing to taunt him, even after you made it clear that you didn't want to engage him further.
You have repeatedly given your side of things. It's not going to change.
Why keep repeating it?
I just don't get it.
Whatever Dr. Peterson's reason(s), I am pleased to see participants here becoming more sensitized to, and speaking out against, gossip and smear campaigns, even if, in this case it is wildly misdirected (at least as I see it), and even if the case in question palls considerably in comparison to much of what occurs in that regard on this board (particularly the smear campaign waged against Dr. Peterson on this an other threads). At least it gives a shadow of hope that on the off-chance that minds here may be turned to honest and thorough introspection and self-criticism, work will commence on removing the beams from our respective eyes.
Thanks, -Wade Englund-