Formal Mormon Theology

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
Ego
Star A
Posts: 85
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2024 10:46 pm

Re: Formal Mormon Theology

Post by Ego »

malkie wrote:
Tue Jul 01, 2025 9:38 pm
No, this was in Texas
“The ego is not master in its own house.” - Sigmund Freud
huckelberry
God
Posts: 3453
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:48 pm

Re: Formal Mormon Theology

Post by huckelberry »

There have been prophets participating on this message board. In Old Testament times there were whole bands of prophets running about. Most prophets are easily forgotten. Perhaps best forgotten ,have been forgotten.
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 2137
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Formal Mormon Theology

Post by I Have Questions »

huckelberry wrote:
Tue Jul 01, 2025 10:09 pm
There have been prophets participating on this message board. In Old Testament times there were whole bands of prophets running about. Most prophets are easily forgotten. Perhaps best forgotten ,have been forgotten.
Most modern Prophets are self appointed. In the SLC LDS Church it is the corporate articles of association that determine succession, and therefore who the next LDS Prophet will be.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5783
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Formal Mormon Theology

Post by MG 2.0 »

Ego wrote:
Tue Jul 01, 2025 9:53 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Tue Jul 01, 2025 9:34 pm


I mean, what came of it in the 'big picture' of things? Like, did it result in a religion that has spread across the world, albeit in pockets of acceptance/belief?

I'm wondering if there is somewhere I can go where I can see the fruits of this prophet you're referring to?

Regards,
MG
Oh, like that. Nothing came of it. He never dropped the belief but he told me that it ‘was not his time yet’ to be revealed to the world. I suppose if you want to judge him on his fruits, I did in fact speak a different language in my mission for what it’s worth :lol:
But in all seriousness, no, it was very harmful what he was doing, for everyone involved.
I think that it is important to look at the fruits that come from someone that makes a claim to speak for God. And that includes Joseph Smith.

Regards,
MG
Post Reply