Turns out - rcrocket is a bishop -

_rcrocket · Post by **_rcrocket** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:00 am

I don't like it but I guess I asked for it. Ms. Mod doesn't like me so I don't expect any favorable treatment. Just please don't go sending nasty letters to my minor children.

Hey Trix, you never responded to my Smith cite about the reduction of malaria, my Leonard cite countering the stuff about the reclaiming river, and the HC cite with the First Presidency proclamation (on the latter, you just mentioned the fact that Bennett was behind it, if I recall), but those three items refute every point you've been making. To accuse me of not providing sources, when I provide, them is a little "internet silliness" of your own.

rcrocket

Post by **_beastie** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:02 am

I'll go respond right now.

Post by **_Nightingale** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:03 am

Take it down. It's totally not right to do that. Does anyone have an instant in with one of the mods? (Where is Bond when you need him?!)

DCP did this to an exmo on the FAIR/MAD board. I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw it and was very disappointed when the mods there decided it was OK to keep it up.

It is stooping low, imho.

Post by **_Bond...James Bond** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:05 am

I got the PM Nightingale, sorry I wasn't around (supper and all that jazz).....it looks like someone already did some moderating on the OP.

I didn't even see the original material....so Crockett is anonymous to me at the very least.

Post by **_Nightingale** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:05 am

Oh thank you Mod/s. That was a great move. Note that FAIR/MAD (I can't remember which it was at the time) did NOT remove the in real life information posted by DCP.

So, "cesspool" is relative.

_rcrocket · Post by **_rcrocket** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:09 am

Bless you, my friends.

Now, repent ye sinners, while I havest your attentioneth.

rcrocket

Post by **_barrelomonkeys** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:16 am

Bond...James Bond wrote:I got the PM Nightingale, sorry I wasn't around (supper and all that jazz).....it looks like someone already did some moderating on the OP.

I didn't even see the original material....so Crockett is anonymous to me at the very least.

Supper! Supper? What?

Keep your tutty right here mister! ;P

Sooo relieved it was taken down.

*big sigh of relief*

Post by **_Dr. Shades** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:17 am

dartagnan wrote:I think I understand the point of this thread. Apparently, anon is trying to illustrate for Robert why posting anonymously is often justifiable.

Yep, I'm sure that that was Anon.a.Mouse4's point. rcrocket, do you now see that Internet anonymity isn't the sin you think it is?

A true story about me that some of you might remember. Back in 2000 on my angelfire website I had uploaded some photos of my sister’s kids. The owner of exmormon8.org, which he called “I hate Mormons Inc” had photo shopped the pictures with speech bubbles above their faces.

Actually, the URL was http://exmormon.8m.com and it was called "I Hate the Mormon Church." It's defunct now, though.

Post by **_keene** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:22 am

I think now is a good time to re-iterate the stance of the management on posting personal information. From the "rules" thread:

2. Don't be stupid, act stupid, or act stupidly.

3. Moderators and administrators will follow the spirit of the law, not the letter of the law.

8. DON'T BE STUPID, ACT STUPID, OR ACT STUPIDLY.

With freedom comes responsibility. We give you the freedom to make someone's life a living hell, but if you're not willing to take responsibility for your actions (e.g. remaining anonymous), then don't do it.

Post by **_Polygamy Porter** » Tue Sep 18, 2007 12:56 am

Great, two bishops on the board.

Funny thing is that they both have something in common, besides their pretend clergy office of bishop.

FYI rCROCKet, your behavior on this board has been, at times, not very "christlike", nnn'k bishie?

DiscussMormonism.com

Turns out - rcrocket is a bishop -

I agree