I wore a burka today.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_antishock8
_Emeritus
Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Jan 27, 2008 2:02 am

Re: I wore a burka today.

Post by _antishock8 »

You can’t trust adults to tell you the truth.

Scream the lie, whisper the retraction.- The Left
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: I wore a burka today.

Post by _The Nehor »

antishock8 wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1048634/LIZ-JONES-The-women-Kabul-tell-British-troops-really-heroes.html?ITO=1490

Image


That is so sexy.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Sister Mary Lisa
_Emeritus
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:39 pm

Re: I wore a burka today.

Post by _Sister Mary Lisa »

antishock8 wrote: I almost wonder if there really is something in the female psyche that demands subordination. I don't know.


I think it's rather easy to assume that women, especially Mormon women or women of other strongly patriarchal religions or societies, have something within them that "demands subordination." It's quite offensive to me to have any man say such a thing, even in such a speculative and inquiring tone. It's not easy to explain but I'll give it a shot because it's important to me.

As little girls in the Mormon church we are taught over and over and over how we are supposed to be good, helpful, meek, nice, pleasant, chaste, and that we should always seek to serve others. We are taught that the thing we are designed to do--yea, even our very purpose, is serve our husband who presides over us, and make our home a haven where we as mothers are to nurture our children lovingly under the divinely sanctioned authority our husband wields over us in righteousness (if we're lucky). We are taught that it is up to us to keep our valiant priesthood-bearing boyfriends chaste and we are to remain pure for the man we are to marry. We are taught that to seek something besides this one role in our lives is to go against God's plan for us, and if we seek anything else consciously, we know fully that we are risking censure from our parents, our peers, our potential mates, our priesthood leaders, and yes, even God himself.

We are praised and rewarded from the time we're young for being meek, submissive, helpful, and pleasant. Above all things, BE NICE. It is widely considered unfeminine and even ugly to be outspoken, opinionated, strong-willed, or to pursue skills or interests beyond those things that help us to fulfil the one role God wants us to perform: being a Mother in Zion.

While the church teaches that women are equal to men, the reality is far different than that. Women in our church ARE subordinate, and powerless to have it be any different by nature of the patriarchy that keeps men in power over them at church and at home. It is perpetuated by the all-male policy-makers at the top. It is also perpetuated by the women themselves, who are less than supportive of (and often downright hostile to) those women who choose to not follow the rules set up for women in the church. And we are taught over and over in little subtle ways as well as in big ways that our value to others and to God Himself actually DEPENDS on us remaining subordinate and meek and sweet and loving and embracing the patriarchy that binds us.

I can easily see why there was a part of Hally that secretly liked the feelings she got while wearing the burka. Not only is it exotic, but we are conditioned to have good feelings when we are submissive and conscious of our man who needs us to be a certain way for him.

The church may not utilize burkas, but it successfully uses other methods that are certainly effective in keeping women bound in their subordination. Breaking free of such mental chains after a lifetime of being taught that this submissiveness and subordination is what a woman *should* value--and is most attractive about her, even--is difficult in ways that are often impossible to fathom unless you've actually lived it yourself.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: I wore a burka today.

Post by _harmony »

Sister Mary Lisa wrote:The church may not utilize burkas, but it successfully uses other methods that are certainly effective in keeping women bound in their subordination. Breaking free of such mental chains after a lifetime of being taught that this submissiveness and subordination is what a woman *should* value--and is most attractive about her, even--is difficult in ways that are often impossible to fathom unless you've actually lived it yourself.


Excellent post, Sister. And if the girl is brave enough and determined enough to walk outside the barriers the church puts up and still remain active in the church, she is continually hounded to marry, hounded to conform by her leaders, her friends, her family. No decision is correct if it means she chooses to remain single, chooses to have a career while she's looking for her mate, chooses to put off marriage and/or children. She is marginalized even while she is secretly admired by younger girls and older women who wish they'd been brave enough to make the choices she makes. She's a danger to the leaders (fearing that younger girls will follow her footsteps). LDS men are attracted and repelled at the same time; they want to tame her and bring her to heel at the same time they are attracted to that which makes her so different from the normal LDS girl.

As each succeeding generation appears, the hold the church has on our girls is lessening. With each generation, more and more of our girls are opting for career before marriage, are marrying later, are delaying starting their families until it suits their schedule instead of the schedule of the leaders in SLCentral. The POTF is a direct result of this... a guilt trip of tremendous magnitude that did little to stem the tide of women refusing to kneel before the priesthood.

In my area, a few years ago, we had 1 singles branch. Now, we have 5 singles wards, as our children delay marriage in hopes of personal fulfillment prior to taking the plunge. They see the results of too many of their peers who jumped into marriage early: divorce, single parents with multiple children, poverty, and misery. It's enough to put anyone off marriage for a long long time.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: I wore a burka today.

Post by _The Nehor »

harmony wrote:
Sister Mary Lisa wrote:The church may not utilize burkas, but it successfully uses other methods that are certainly effective in keeping women bound in their subordination. Breaking free of such mental chains after a lifetime of being taught that this submissiveness and subordination is what a woman *should* value--and is most attractive about her, even--is difficult in ways that are often impossible to fathom unless you've actually lived it yourself.


Excellent post, Sister. And if the girl is brave enough and determined enough to walk outside the barriers the church puts up and still remain active in the church, she is continually hounded to marry, hounded to conform by her leaders, her friends, her family. No decision is correct if it means she chooses to remain single, chooses to have a career while she's looking for her mate, chooses to put off marriage and/or children. She is marginalized even while she is secretly admired by younger girls and older women who wish they'd been brave enough to make the choices she makes. She's a danger to the leaders (fearing that younger girls will follow her footsteps). LDS men are attracted and repelled at the same time; they want to tame her and bring her to heel at the same time they are attracted to that which makes her so different from the normal LDS girl.

As each succeeding generation appears, the hold the church has on our girls is lessening. With each generation, more and more of our girls are opting for career before marriage, are marrying later, are delaying starting their families until it suits their schedule instead of the schedule of the leaders in SLCentral. The POTF is a direct result of this... a guilt trip of tremendous magnitude that did little to stem the tide of women refusing to kneel before the priesthood.

In my area, a few years ago, we had 1 singles branch. Now, we have 5 singles wards, as our children delay marriage in hopes of personal fulfillment prior to taking the plunge. They see the results of too many of their peers who jumped into marriage early: divorce, single parents with multiple children, poverty, and misery. It's enough to put anyone off marriage for a long long time.


I felt a tear run down my cheek and turned on triumphant inspirational music while reading this.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: I wore a burka today.

Post by _harmony »

The Nehor wrote:I felt a tear run down my cheek and turned on triumphant inspirational music while reading this.


You lost me, Nehor. Either that or my sarcasm detector went into overdrive.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Pokatator
_Emeritus
Posts: 1417
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:38 pm

Re: I wore a burka today.

Post by _Pokatator »

The Nehor wrote:
antishock8 wrote:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1048634/LIZ-JONES-The-women-Kabul-tell-British-troops-really-heroes.html?ITO=1490

Image


That is so sexy.


Nehor, Mormon women wear burkas too. They just wear them under their clothes. Do you think they are sexy, too? Oh sorry, how would you know? You're probably just still fighting the abuse battle of your little factory.
I think it would be morally right to lie about your religion to edit the article favorably.
bcspace
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Re: I wore a burka today.

Post by _The Nehor »

Pokatator wrote:Nehor, Mormon women wear burkas too. They just wear them under their clothes. Do you think they are sexy, too? Oh sorry, how would you know? You're probably just still fighting the abuse battle of your little factory.


I do think they are sexy. I know. I won that battle years ago.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Re: I wore a burka today.

Post by _harmony »

The Nehor wrote:
Pokatator wrote:Nehor, Mormon women wear burkas too. They just wear them under their clothes. Do you think they are sexy, too? .


I do think they are sexy. I know. I won that battle years ago.


There's no accounting for taste.
(Nevo, Jan 23) And the Melchizedek Priesthood may not have been restored until the summer of 1830, several months after the organization of the Church.
_Sister Mary Lisa
_Emeritus
Posts: 129
Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:39 pm

Re: I wore a burka today.

Post by _Sister Mary Lisa »

The Nehor wrote:
Pokatator wrote:Nehor, Mormon women wear burkas too. They just wear them under their clothes. Do you think they are sexy, too? Oh sorry, how would you know? You're probably just still fighting the abuse battle of your little factory.


I do think they are sexy. I know. I won that battle years ago.


There are many men and women who think it's most attractive and desirable when women accept "their place."
Post Reply