I quote....
When the Twelve met the day after Carrington’s second letter,
the former apostle’s rebaptism was far from settled; many of the apostles
were still irate—as much at Carrington’s having lied to them as at
his adultery. “After dinner the case of Albert Carrington was brought
up,” recorded Heber Grant.
President Wilford Woodruff stated that he had received a number of
letters from Carrington requesting baptism. He said he would feel
much better to rebaptize him than to deny him this boon. Felt that
when he got through with this life, and met Albert Carrington in the
eternal worlds, that he would dislike to have him accuse him of a lack of
mercy.
John with. Taylor moved that our quorum sanction the rebaptism
of Albert Carrington into the Church. This motion was seconded by
Daniel H. Wells.
Grant then narrated in considerable detail the deliberations
that followed:
The rest is Grants retelling of the meeting, which doesn't include John Taylor, but as stated is a meeting later after his death.
As anyone can see from the above quote the author at the link Gary James Bergera, clearly "imply's" that John Taylor was at this particular meeting.
So, while it was my error at first in that I "skimmed" the information at the link, the ultimate error is with the author, not me.
Still, I conceeded that point as an error.
2. So, here again we see grindael entirely refuses to provide a simple screenshot of the page of Grants Journal which say's Grant is the one saying the statement in question, rather than Woodruff as the above linked article says (again a second error by that author).
Whether Grants Journal is in digital or hard copy form, it would take anywhere from 1-5 min's to simply screenshot it and upload it.
Yet, instead grindael has created TWO LONG POSTS now, trying to belittle me, diverting peoples attention from the fact that he's been caught lying. In that time, he could have easily demonstrated his case, at least with the necessary evidence.
Instead, he continues to berate me, telling me to buy it myself.
So, again..... I call for referrences.
You claim Grant said it. You thus need to prove it. You're after all the one who's creating the article claiming this.
You've likely already put it on your website demonstrating it as another "Mormon liar".
You're the one pretending to be a "scholar"...... so, do as scholars do, provide your SOURCES!!!!
3. And by the way grindal..... I didn't say a thing about John Taylor in my second post.
Yet your response post that was supposedly a responce to that post, has multiple bolds of you stating John Taylor was dead already.
I had already conceeded that point, yet you act like I didn't. Thus, clearly you bearly at all responded to my second post in any sort of intellectual and cohesive manner.
You've lost at every turn, but still can't admit when you are wrong. (Astoundingly, incredibly, massively wrong) Here is the last nail in the coffin. Eat some more crow, sucka! Copyright & Page 1, Pages 50-51, the Grant quote is top left on page 50. Now, piss off, dipstick. You know nothing about Mormonism but what you read from Mopologists. It is obvious that reading such trash has made you a dimwit. 
