Res Ipsa wrote:Given the history of the recovered memory fiasco, it would be odd if the complaint alleged that recovered memories were involved.
If a perpetrator understands that if he or she intentionally makes an event horrifying enough, a child's mind will forget the trauma, is the perpetrator incentivizwd to make the event horrifying?
What kind of things would a perpetrator need to do to make an event horrifying?
If a Mormon perpetrator were to intentionally design horrifying events so a child would forget, would it be surprising if the events aligned with the Mormon religion? Would we expect a Mormon perpetrator to design horrifying events that aligned with Islam?
If a child forgets a horrifying trauma, how can the adulit the child becomes ever remember the trauma without "recovering" the memory?
Is the "recovered memory fiasco" another red herring?
If you've forgotten something from your own childhood, does that mean it didn't happen?