DCP posting personal information of Cody Temple critics

[Kishkumen]

OMG! The proposed temple site is right in the middle of town! Good Lord! Does DCP ever tell the truth?

Except it isn’t, and the video is not DCP’s.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

DS: "Might I suggest your obsession with these emails is bordering on the unhealthy."

What "obsession"?

They go directly into their own file. I seldom even read them. And the computer itself automatically does the counting.

DS: "There's obviously deep-seeded reasons you continue to mention them on your posts here at Sic et Non and on podcasts and on radio shows."

When was the last time that I mentioned them here, DS? Several months ago, at least. And I suppose that I should be gratified that you pay such unhealthy and obsessive attention to my podcasts and radio shows, but can you please remind me of the last couple of times that these anonymous hate mail messages were an important topic on any of those radio shows or podcasts?

DS: "You should just block them. It would take just a few seconds to never have to see them again."

I scarcely ever see them now. But I'll have a large file of them ready for the police or any legal proceedings, when and if the occasion warrants it. And, in the meantime, I would rather be aware of what this secretive loon is up to.

It's fun to see you try to turn even these nearly 2500 piece of anonymous hate mail into grounds for criticizing me: You're dedicated. I'll give you that.

Daniel’s numbers don’t add up. See the history here:

viewtopic.php?t=156274

2021: the emailer has sent 600 emails in 9 years
2022: the emailer has sent 800 emails in 10 years
2023: the emailer has now sent 2300 (or is it nearly 2500?) emails in 11 years

Dan, your dumb little story doesn’t pass the smell test.

Watch the emails stop after The Midge dies.

[Doctor Scratch]

I really don't understand the big deal about looking up information that is public. That said, Dr. Peterson has complained several times that there is an individual who looked up one of his son's publicly available Amazon.com information. It does seem a little hypocritical of Dr. Peterson to complain about his son's publicly available Amazon information, but defend his actions for doing. in essence, the same thing.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... again.html

An interesting comparison.

This isn’t quite accurate. Nobody looked up “his son’s” Amazon wish list. I doubt anyone here even knows what his kid’s name is. Instead, someone looked up *his*—i.e., DCP’s—Amazon wish list. It had his name on it, and apart from the somewhat peculiar fact that “Grand Theft Auto 3” was among the items listed, there was no reason to doubt that it was Dr. Peterson’s list. But he announced to the whole board that he confronted his kids about the GTA3 listing, and one of them confessed, and at that point DCP flew off the handle and began accusing people of “dragging” his kids into the discussion. The reality, though, is that he threw his own son under the bus in order to avoid being accused of having put GTA3 on his wish list.

[Dr Moore]

In fairness, GTA3 was pretty epic. For puerile grown-ups, especially.

[drumdude]

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... again.html

An interesting comparison.

This isn’t quite accurate. Nobody looked up “his son’s” Amazon wish list. I doubt anyone here even knows what his kid’s name is. Instead, someone looked up *his*—i.e., DCP’s—Amazon wish list. It had his name on it, and apart from the somewhat peculiar fact that “Grand Theft Auto 3” was among the items listed, there was no reason to doubt that it was Dr. Peterson’s list. But he announced to the whole board that he confronted his kids about the GTA3 listing, and one of them confessed, and at that point DCP flew off the handle and began accusing people of “dragging” his kids into the discussion. The reality, though, is that he threw his own son under the bus in order to avoid being accused of having put GTA3 on his wish list.

LOL

This must have been back when Mormons were teaching that playing Grand Theft Auto was a sin next to murder.

DCP recently confessed to watching Oppenheimer, and presumably keeping his eyes open while the female actress showed her bare breasts. Oh how times have changed.

[malkie]

This isn’t quite accurate. Nobody looked up “his son’s” Amazon wish list. I doubt anyone here even knows what his kid’s name is. Instead, someone looked up *his*—i.e., DCP’s—Amazon wish list. It had his name on it, and apart from the somewhat peculiar fact that “Grand Theft Auto 3” was among the items listed, there was no reason to doubt that it was Dr. Peterson’s list. But he announced to the whole board that he confronted his kids about the GTA3 listing, and one of them confessed, and at that point DCP flew off the handle and began accusing people of “dragging” his kids into the discussion. The reality, though, is that he threw his own son under the bus in order to avoid being accused of having put GTA3 on his wish list.

LOL

This must have been back when Mormons were teaching that playing Grand Theft Auto was a sin next to murder.

DCP recently confessed to watching Oppenheimer, and presumably keeping his eyes open while the female actress showed her bare breasts. Oh how times have changed.

I have no objection to female breasts in general, nor to that ladies' in particular, but I really, really failed to see how the scenes that exposed her breasts enhanced the movie in any way.

I would have much preferred taking the time to put some of the other scenes, for example, Fermi's "pile", in scientific/technological context.

Sorry for the irrelevant aside.

[drumdude]

LOL

This must have been back when Mormons were teaching that playing Grand Theft Auto was a sin next to murder.

DCP recently confessed to watching Oppenheimer, and presumably keeping his eyes open while the female actress showed her bare breasts. Oh how times have changed.

I have no objection to female breasts in general, nor to that ladies' in particular, but I really, really failed to see how the scenes that exposed her breasts enhanced the movie in any way.

I would have much preferred taking the time to put some of the other scenes, for example, Fermi's "pile", in scientific/technological context.

Sorry for the irrelevant aside.

I don’t disagree. I suppose it was meant to show that the man was a bit of a womanizer.

[malkie]

I have no objection to female breasts in general, nor to that ladies' in particular, but I really, really failed to see how the scenes that exposed her breasts enhanced the movie in any way.

I would have much preferred taking the time to put some of the other scenes, for example, Fermi's "pile", in scientific/technological context.

Sorry for the irrelevant aside.

I don’t disagree. I suppose it was meant to show that the man was a bit of a womanizer.

For me, that was quite clear enough from all of his interactions with women that did not involve the exposure of breasts.

[I Have Questions]

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... again.html

An interesting comparison.

This isn’t quite accurate. Nobody looked up “his son’s” Amazon wish list. I doubt anyone here even knows what his kid’s name is. Instead, someone looked up *his*—i.e., DCP’s—Amazon wish list. It had his name on it, and apart from the somewhat peculiar fact that “Grand Theft Auto 3” was among the items listed, there was no reason to doubt that it was Dr. Peterson’s list. But he announced to the whole board that he confronted his kids about the GTA3 listing, and one of them confessed, and at that point DCP flew off the handle and began accusing people of “dragging” his kids into the discussion. The reality, though, is that he threw his own son under the bus in order to avoid being accused of having put GTA3 on his wish list.

Here’s how Dan portrays the incident…

What I didn't like about my pre-teen son's Amazon.com Christmas wish list being looked up and shared for hostile comment by my Malevolent Stalker on the Peterson Obsession Board wasn't just the attempt to brand me as a bad father because my then pre-adolescent son wanted a video game that we, in fact, didn't get for him. It was the sheer inappropriateness of dragging one of my children into the perpetual crusade against me.

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... again.html

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Who cares about Dorkenpork’s opinion on this matter, anyway? He got his comeuppance, was treated the way he treats others, and is throwing a tantrum. Because that’s what Dorkenpork does.

I do find this email thing psychologically fascinatingTM, though.

Up front, I don’t believe his account of whatever is going on, but let’s say it’s happening. Dorkenpork knows who it is, and doesn’t want to doxx him, nor Does he want to see his harasser catch a felony. If it is, indeed, happening then Dorkenpork is protecting him.

eta: it’s totally The Midge