The child abusing polygamist legacy of Joseph Smith continues

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
drumdude
God
Posts: 7108
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: The child abusing polygamist legacy of Joseph Smith continues

Post by drumdude »

I Have Questions wrote:
Wed Dec 11, 2024 2:47 pm
Given that Smith married children as young as 14 years old, and other men's wives, and coerced families into giving up their young women with promises of eternal dynastic favour alongside threats of damnation if they didn't, I doubt that there wasn't any child abuse or other abuse types taking place.
Was it even considered a crime back then? Outside of murder, how often was abuse really investigated and prosecuted on the American frontier?
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 1794
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: The child abusing polygamist legacy of Joseph Smith continues

Post by I Have Questions »

drumdude wrote:
Wed Dec 11, 2024 2:59 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Wed Dec 11, 2024 2:47 pm
Given that Smith married children as young as 14 years old, and other men's wives, and coerced families into giving up their young women with promises of eternal dynastic favour alongside threats of damnation if they didn't, I doubt that there wasn't any child abuse or other abuse types taking place.
Was it even considered a crime back then? Outside of murder, how often was abuse really investigated and prosecuted on the American frontier?
That doesn't make it right. And surely it was considered a crime in the eyes of God? Or is "don't sexually abuse minors" one of those pesky temporary commandments that Oaks spoke about?
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
drumdude
God
Posts: 7108
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am

Re: The child abusing polygamist legacy of Joseph Smith continues

Post by drumdude »

I Have Questions wrote:
Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:01 pm
drumdude wrote:
Wed Dec 11, 2024 2:59 pm
Was it even considered a crime back then? Outside of murder, how often was abuse really investigated and prosecuted on the American frontier?
That doesn't make it right. And surely it was considered a crime in the eyes of God? Or is "don't sexually abuse minors" one of those pesky temporary commandments that Oaks spoke about?
I just mean it’s unlikely that we would have good records of it occurring. The fact that Joseph’s former allies called him out for Fanny Alger was probably the tip of an iceberg we will never see.
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 1794
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: The child abusing polygamist legacy of Joseph Smith continues

Post by I Have Questions »

drumdude wrote:
Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:05 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Wed Dec 11, 2024 3:01 pm
That doesn't make it right. And surely it was considered a crime in the eyes of God? Or is "don't sexually abuse minors" one of those pesky temporary commandments that Oaks spoke about?
I just mean it’s unlikely that we would have good records of it occurring. The fact that Joseph’s former allies called him out for Fanny Alger was probably the tip of an iceberg we will never see.
I think you’re right.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Post Reply