A.I. Mopologetics

[Dr Exiled]

My guess is that a few years from now or perhaps its already here, where these supposed discussion boards or other social media is just thousands of bots against the poor human. It's a great place for Asch type conformity experiments or manipulation. Thousands of bots immediately attacking non-conforming opinion could work to a certain extent that is until the population realizes what they are dealing with, then the next step would be to have the bot army create a supposed savior to seemingly attack the castle, gain recruits and then lead the humans down the wrong path in the end.

I think we really need to pay attention to what's going on with A.I.. The supposed A.I. fight between our billionaires against China's or Russia's or Europe's could really be just theatre designed to dissuade us from attacking the real castle.

[Dr Exiled]

Here is what China's A.I. said about using A.I. to defend Mormonism:

Opportunities for A.I. in Composing an Apologetic
Efficiency and Organization:

A.I. can quickly gather, organize, and present information from a wide range of sources, including scriptures, historical documents, and theological arguments.

It can help structure arguments logically and coherently, making complex ideas more accessible.

Historical and Scriptural Analysis:

A.I. can analyze large volumes of text, such as the Book of Mormon, the Bible, Doctrine and Covenants, and Pearl of Great Price, to identify patterns, themes, and connections that support apologetic arguments.

It can also cross-reference historical documents and scholarly works to provide context for controversial issues.

Addressing Common Criticisms:

A.I. can be trained to respond to common criticisms of Mormonism, such as questions about Joseph Smith's translation of the Book of Mormon, polygamy, or historical anachronisms.

It can provide well-reasoned, evidence-based responses to these criticisms.

Personalization:

A.I. can tailor apologetic arguments to specific audiences, taking into account their cultural, religious, or intellectual backgrounds.

Language and Tone:

A.I. can help craft arguments in a respectful and empathetic tone, which is important when discussing sensitive religious topics.

Challenges and Limitations
Bias and Accuracy:

A.I. models are only as good as the data they are trained on. If the training data is biased or incomplete, the A.I. may produce inaccurate or misleading arguments.

Apologetics often involves nuanced theological and historical debates that require deep understanding and context, which A.I. may lack.

Lack of Spiritual Insight:

Apologetics in a religious context often relies on spiritual experiences and testimonies, which A.I. cannot authentically replicate or understand.

The LDS Church emphasizes personal revelation and faith, which are beyond the scope of A.I.'s capabilities.

Ethical Concerns:

Using A.I. to defend a religious position could be seen as impersonal or manipulative, especially if the audience perceives the arguments as artificially generated rather than heartfelt.

There may also be concerns about transparency if A.I.-generated content is not clearly identified as such.

Complexity of Religious Issues:

Many issues in Mormon apologetics (e.g., the origins of the Book of Mormon, the priesthood ban on Black members, or the Mountain Meadows Massacre) are highly complex and require careful, sensitive handling. A.I. may oversimplify or misrepresent these issues.

Dependence on A.I.:

Over-reliance on A.I. for apologetics could lead to a lack of critical thinking and engagement by human apologists, potentially weakening the depth and authenticity of the defense.

Best Practices for Using A.I. in Mormon Apologetics
Use A.I. as a Tool, Not a Replacement:

A.I. should complement human effort, not replace it. Human apologists can use A.I. to generate ideas, organize information, or draft arguments, but they should review and refine the output to ensure accuracy and authenticity.

Ensure Transparency:

If A.I.-generated content is used in public apologetics, it should be clearly disclosed to maintain trust and transparency.

Focus on Education and Dialogue:

Apologetics should aim to educate and foster understanding, not just "win" arguments. A.I. can help present information in a clear and respectful manner, but the goal should always be constructive dialogue.

Incorporate Spiritual Testimony:

Since faith and personal testimony are central to Mormonism, human apologists should integrate their own spiritual experiences and insights into any A.I.-assisted apologetic work.

Address Controversies with Sensitivity:

A.I. can help provide historical and theological context for controversial issues, but human apologists should ensure that these topics are handled with care and empathy.

Conclusion
A.I. can be a valuable tool for composing apologetics in defense of the Mormon religion, particularly in organizing information, addressing common criticisms, and presenting arguments clearly. However, it should be used thoughtfully and in conjunction with human insight, spiritual testimony, and ethical considerations. Ultimately, the strength of any apologetic effort lies in its ability to engage sincerely and respectfully with both believers and skeptics alike.

[Fence Sitter]

Look on the bright side of this. The quality of sacrament talks is going to dramatically improve.

[Kishkumen]

It's possible Jared the Mormonbot was actually created by Meta itself. The company has been caught creating fake bot accounts for reasons that remain murky.

https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/social-med ... rcna186177

Huh! Wow. That is fascinating! And more than a little creepy.

[Kishkumen]

It's the end of the world. But I don't think it actually will be. Instead I optimistically think that future generations will look back at the time before generative A.I. as an intellectual dark age in which humans slaved at mechanical intellectual tasks and had no time for real thought.

Those poor old people, they'll think: they pored through card catalogs and Google lists—by hand! They flipped through thesauruses for alternative adjectives and worried about run-on sentences. They even fussed about spelling! It was impressive, I guess, that humans back then could actually get almost as good at those things as a modern A.I.. A few people still practice the old ways, as an art form, and it can be fun to read some artisanal prose and realise it was all made by hand. If you're into that, you should check out this author I found who writes her own texts by hand with a quill. And I've heard about this one artist who just sits there and talks about any subject you choose. Must be wild.

The task I see for us now is to figure out as quickly as possible just what it is that we are now freed to do, full-time, that before we could only do in short pauses from our mechanical tasks. We'll discover a new way of thinking. It will probably seem to us now like something frivolous, an unimportant distraction from actual mental work. In the future they'll just call it thinking.

Probably better to be optimistic in the face of a change that is coming and cannot be avoided. Still, I don't know that I can join you there. The problem is not in the A.I. but the funders and programmers.

[Kishkumen]

My guess is that a few years from now or perhaps its already here, where these supposed discussion boards or other social media is just thousands of bots against the poor human. It's a great place for Asch type conformity experiments or manipulation. Thousands of bots immediately attacking non-conforming opinion could work to a certain extent that is until the population realizes what they are dealing with, then the next step would be to have the bot army create a supposed savior to seemingly attack the castle, gain recruits and then lead the humans down the wrong path in the end.

I think we really need to pay attention to what's going on with A.I.. The supposed A.I. fight between our billionaires against China's or Russia's or Europe's could really be just theatre designed to dissuade us from attacking the real castle.

I have felt that way with our most aggressive and committed trolls. It can be overwhelming to deal with someone who is tearing through the board, posting tons of nonsense.