
General Conference April 2025 was “white and delightsome”
- Everybody Wang Chung
- God
- Posts: 2550
- Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:52 am
Re: General Conference April 2025 was “white and delightsome”

"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."
Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
-
- God
- Posts: 5265
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: General Conference April 2025 was “white and delightsome”
This is similar to the argument that we ought to be responsible for the past racial injustices of those in early America by paying out restitution...from our pockets...or go about apologizing for things that we had no direct responsibility for.drumdude wrote: ↑Wed Apr 16, 2025 3:08 amThe church teaches that the seven parts are recognizing sin, feeling sorrow for sin, forsaking sin, confessing sin, making restitution, forgiving others, and keeping the commandments.
The apologetic argument that “Church leaders were a product of their time” is not taking full responsibility, in my opinion.
Makes no sense.
The modern church leaders and organization speak in their actions. But to take personal...as in personal...responsibility for what others did or said?
This is just another tactic used by critics to try and poke holes in church leadership.
It gets old.
Regards,
Mg
-
- God
- Posts: 7135
- Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 5:29 am
Re: General Conference April 2025 was “white and delightsome”
I’m just pointing out the hypocrisy that the church isn’t willing to practice what it preaches.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 16, 2025 6:37 pmThis is similar to the argument that we ought to be responsible for the past racial injustices of those in early America by paying out restitution...from our pockets...or go about apologizing for things that we had no direct responsibility for.drumdude wrote: ↑Wed Apr 16, 2025 3:08 am
The church teaches that the seven parts are recognizing sin, feeling sorrow for sin, forsaking sin, confessing sin, making restitution, forgiving others, and keeping the commandments.
The apologetic argument that “Church leaders were a product of their time” is not taking full responsibility, in my opinion.
Makes no sense.
The modern church leaders and organization speak in their actions. But to take personal...as in personal...responsibility for what others did or said?
This is just another tactic used by critics to try and poke holes in church leadership.
It gets old.
Regards,
Mg
“Rules for thee, not for me.”
-
- God
- Posts: 5265
- Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm
Re: General Conference April 2025 was “white and delightsome”
For the reasons mentioned, I wouldn't expect them to do anything different than what they've done.drumdude wrote: ↑Wed Apr 16, 2025 6:58 pmI’m just pointing out the hypocrisy that the church isn’t willing to practice what it preaches.MG 2.0 wrote: ↑Wed Apr 16, 2025 6:37 pm
This is similar to the argument that we ought to be responsible for the past racial injustices of those in early America by paying out restitution...from our pockets...or go about apologizing for things that we had no direct responsibility for.
Makes no sense.
The modern church leaders and organization speak in their actions. But to take personal...as in personal...responsibility for what others did or said?
This is just another tactic used by critics to try and poke holes in church leadership.
It gets old.
Regards,
Mg
“Rules for thee, not for me.”
We can agree to disagree.

Regards,
MG