Yes. It’s the equivalent of people in two thousand years time using a collection of this century’s Twitter Posts as the basis for belief in something supernatural. “Let’s turn to Trump 3:16 for today’s lesson”. It’s an Iron Age collection of agenda-driven here say, rumour, supposition, conjecture, Chinese whispers, fantasy, fabrication etc.yellowstone123 wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2026 5:36 amWhat is scripture? Copies of reported first-century Christian literature, second- or third-hand information at best. This is why the Book of Mormon could have been so great with direct quotes from Jesus; instead, we get second- or third-hand information of reported first-century Christian literature, errors and all.Jersey Girl wrote: ↑Tue Jul 21, 2026 5:08 am
Aren't you cherry picking scripture out of context, sock?
That's kind of like saying Harry Potter was an idiot because Hermione said so in Stone instead of reading the whole cannon. You wouldn't do that, would you?
Christian??? Only true church???
-
I Have Questions
- God
- Posts: 4193
- Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am
Re: Christian??? Only true church???
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.