It certainly wouldn't be that your sources are suspect,
You haven't even touched my sources. You have a problem in that one of the easier ones happens to be a proctologist which tells me you are afraid to tackle the dozens of others I gave.
you didn't compile your sources on your own (but instead are relying on someone else's representation of what they are supposed to mean but don't always), you haven't read through all of them enough to be familiar with them, and other research has been presented to refute your claims (which you also won't read).
Incorrect on all counts. You actually know that you are wrong, but you must bluster in order to avoid having to address the issue and try to keep me from posting posting more references.
Please, go ahead and perform your well-deserved victory dance (not).
This is by far not the only forum where gay activists have not been able to handle the preponderance of evidence against them. I can wait.