Page 26 of 26
Re: for what it's worth, my review of Greg Smith's "review" of Mormon Stori
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 2:20 pm
by _Mayan Elephant
Kishkumen wrote:Can we split off the last exchange between Mayan Elephant and Water Dog. No need to poop on every thread for the sake of the Dehlin lynching party.
Oh, and take off this one too.
No. We can't.
where to start with the editing and tidying up for you Kish? At the point where dehlin offers water dog the mic? Or at the point where such an insane idea is pointed out and your feelings get hurt?
Re: for what it's worth, my review of Greg Smith's "review" of Mormon Stori
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 6:10 pm
by _Maksutov
Kishkumen wrote:Can we split off the last exchange between Mayan Elephant and Water Dog. No need to poop on every thread for the sake of the Dehlin lynching party.
Oh, and take off this one too.
It's beginning to remind me of the Kent phenomenon.
Re: for what it's worth, my review of Greg Smith's "review" of Mormon Stori
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:05 pm
by _Kishkumen
This is one of the very best OPs and best threads on this board, to let it get crapped upon in this way is a travesty. Please split it off.
Re: for what it's worth, my review of Greg Smith's "review" of Mormon Stori
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:23 pm
by _Mayan Elephant
Editing it is more of a travesty than a simple bump and response.
Re: for what it's worth, my review of Greg Smith's "review" of Mormon Stori
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:30 pm
by _Kishkumen
Mayan Elephant wrote:Editing it is more of a travesty than a simple bump and response.
No, it isn't.
Re: for what it's worth, my review of Greg Smith's "review" of Mormon Stori
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 9:54 pm
by _Mayan Elephant
If you had objected to the post that was bumped when it was made or in the weeks since, maybe your whining would have some validity. Nothing since has been off-topic to the contemporary conversation or the OP. Editing topics and conversations for your sensitivities is overkill when you could have either addressed the topic or ignored it.
I see no precedent for editing threads for veering off a bit or hurting your feelings. Nor do i see precedent for editing threads after a bump if it is topical for the OP or another thread.
The exchange leading to your bitch is less off-topic than your bitch. And I hope this stunt doesn't become the reason for editing.
Re: for what it's worth, my review of Greg Smith's "review" of Mormon Stori
Posted: Fri Feb 06, 2015 10:06 pm
by _Kishkumen
Mayan Elephant wrote:If you had objected to the post that was bumped when it was made or in the weeks since, maybe your whining would have some validity. Nothing since has been off-topic to the contemporary conversation or the OP. Editing topics and conversations for your sensitivities is overkill when you could have either addressed the topic or ignored it.
I see no precedent for editing threads for veering off a bit or hurting your feelings. Nor do i see precedent for editing threads after a bump if it is topical for the OP or another thread.
The exchange leading to your bitch is less off-topic than your bitch. And I hope this stunt doesn't become the reason for editing.
None of the crap you have appended to this thread has anything to do with Rollo's criticism of the Dehlin hit piece. So, piss off.
Re: for what it's worth, my review of Greg Smith's "review" of Mormon Stori
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2015 12:45 am
by _Doctor CamNC4Me
I did a quick search on Reddit, and it seems Mr. Dehlin helps quite a few Mormons either make peace with their faith, or transition:
http://www.reddit.com/r/exmormon/search ... ance&t=all- Doc
Re: for what it's worth, my review of Greg Smith's "review" of Mormon Stori
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2015 4:40 am
by _Rollo Tomasi
I can't believe it has now been close to two years since I wrote that far too long post. I put in a lot of time because I was angry after reading Greg Smith's two papers published by Interpreter, which I found to be unworthy of ANY scholarly consideration. And I feel the same way today.
Re: for what it's worth, my review of Greg Smith's "review" of Mormon Stori
Posted: Sat Feb 07, 2015 6:43 pm
by _Kishkumen
Rollo Tomasi wrote:I can't believe it has now been close to two years since I wrote that far too long post. I put in a lot of time because I was angry after reading Greg Smith's two papers published by Interpreter, which I found to be unworthy of ANY scholarly consideration. And I feel the same way today.
You were right then and you are right now.