But........I for one would think it is vital to INCLUDE the questions exactly as you ask of A.I. so we can see the built in biases you are pre-loading into the A.I. answers.
I agree. I've been hot and cold in doing so. I mentioned to Morley that I would make a better effort to remember to include the inquiry along with the response. There have been times when I've honestly spaced out in doing so, especially if I'm responding to different threads and in somewhat of a hurry.
I learned today that mg also edits what he coaxes his A.I. to say. Along with leaving out the prompts he uses, and his claims that what is produced are facts, I would argue it's lazy and also intellectually dishonest.
You would.
Regards,
MG
That’s because it is.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
I suppose that's a common refrain pointed in all directions in regards to those that use A.I. in order to expedite tasks and retrieve information for further editing and use.
But........I for one would think it is vital to INCLUDE the questions exactly as you ask of A.I. so we can see the built in biases you are pre-loading into the A.I. answers.
I agree. I've been hot and cold in doing so. I mentioned to Morley that I would make a better effort to remember to include the inquiry along with the response. There have been times when I've honestly spaced out in doing so, especially if I'm responding to different threads and in somewhat of a hurry.
So yeah, you make a valid point.
Regards,
MG
MG, consider including the inquiry. Some ‘bias’ in the structure of an inquiry is normal and expected, but A.I. has been shown in threads elsewhere to occasionally hallucinate, so being able to see the relationship between the inquiry and the response is helpful.
I agree. I've been hot and cold in doing so. I mentioned to Morley that I would make a better effort to remember to include the inquiry along with the response. There have been times when I've honestly spaced out in doing so, especially if I'm responding to different threads and in somewhat of a hurry.
So yeah, you make a valid point.
Regards,
MG
MG, consider including the inquiry. Some ‘bias’ in the structure of an inquiry is normal and expected, but A.I. has been shown in threads elsewhere to occasionally hallucinate, so being able to see the relationship between the inquiry and the response is helpful.
I suppose that's a common refrain pointed in all directions in regards to those that use A.I. in order to expedite tasks and retrieve information for further editing and use.
It's here to stay. Get used to it.
Regards,
MG
I’m fully aware that your lazy and dishonest posting is here to stay. It’s a stain on the board but the board rules allow for you to be as lazy and dishonest as you want to be. Which is a lot, it seems. Here’s your Church’s definition of “lying”…
Lying is intentionally deceiving others. Bearing false witness is one form of lying. The Lord gave this commandment to the children of Israel: “Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour” (Exodus 20:16). Jesus also taught this when He was on earth (see Matthew 19:18). There are many other forms of lying. When we speak untruths, we are guilty of lying. We can also intentionally deceive others by a gesture or a look, by silence, or by telling only part of the truth. Whenever we lead people in any way to believe something that is not true, we are not being honest.
It fits you like a glove.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
