Greetings apostates

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

OUT OF MY MISERY wrote:
This does not creep me out because for one thing I do not believe this is Boyd K. Packer.


Of course it's Boyd K. Packer. The Holy Ghost has confirmed it to me.

Second thing is why would you all let words in a post creep you out?


He's an old dude. He talks about masturbation. Do the math.

Third thing why do you allow Mr. Boyd K. Packer such power over you?


He doesn't have any real power over me. I just get lost in his dreamy eyes....*Sigh*

Your Mormonism is showing big time I guess and seeing as how I have no Mormonism in me he has no power over me


Congratulations. by the way: Your EPIDERMIS is showing big time.

So to you Boyd k. Packer Frak off and Die and stop pretending like you are someone you're not cause you are pissing me off.


Honestly is that the way to talk to a man of God? He has the power to zap people with lightning bolts, and he'd do it if he wasn't such a nice guy. Count yourself lucky that he has the wisdom to look beyond your words and know that he can always submit your name for proxy baptism. He'll have your soul in this life or the next.

And Freedom of Speech is everyones right whether we like it or not and whether we agree with what the person said.


Exactly. Boyd K. has just as much right to say what he wants as you do. The difference being that he speaks in coherent sentences.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_ajax18
_Emeritus
Posts: 6914
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:56 am

Post by _ajax18 »

President Packer,

In your many leadership duties in the Church throughout your life, have you ever been led by the spirit to motivate/castigate members of the flock by physical means, like roughing up a lazy missionary, spanking your child for not being ready for Church on time, or or maybe even carry out a blood attonement on those guilty of adultery?

One other thing I always wanted to ask. When you have a question that you need God's help to answer, are you ever not quite sure what God's answer is, or does God talk to you face to face, so that there is less ambiguity?
And when the confederates saw Jackson standing fearless as a stone wall the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
_Lucretia MacEvil
_Emeritus
Posts: 1558
Joined: Mon Dec 18, 2006 7:01 am

Post by _Lucretia MacEvil »

I'm not creeped out. This thread is hilarious. But then, I don't have the companionship of the Holy Ghost.
_gramps
_Emeritus
Posts: 2485
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 3:43 pm

Post by _gramps »

Lucretia MacEvil wrote:I'm not creeped out. This thread is hilarious. But then, I don't have the companionship of the Holy Ghost.


Here! Here!
I detest my loose style and my libertine sentiments. I thank God, who has removed from my eyes the veil...
Adrian Beverland
_OUT OF MY MISERY
_Emeritus
Posts: 922
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:32 pm

Post by _OUT OF MY MISERY »

Lucretia MacEvil wrote:I'm not creeped out. This thread is hilarious. But then, I don't have the companionship of the Holy Ghost.


Nice to see someone else shares my humor. I think this thread is hilarious too. I wish Boyd would post more actually. He livens up a sometimes dull message board. I lack the HG as well oh well.

I just thought it was strange there were others that said they were creeped out that is all.

Packer dude post some more we all need a good laugh or a good scare.
When I wake up I will be hungry....but this feels so good right now aaahhhhhh........
_Mephitus
_Emeritus
Posts: 820
Joined: Sun Dec 31, 2006 1:44 pm

Post by _Mephitus »

I guess I've been out long enough too. For i found it devilishly funny.
One nice thing is, ze game of love is never called on account of darkness - Pepe Le Pew
_Mary
_Emeritus
Posts: 1774
Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2006 9:45 pm

Post by _Mary »

I'm kind of with Why me on this one.
Most of you guys will have figured out that no way in 'hell' is that the real BKP...but there might be someone surfing on the web, who actually does think it is him. That's scary....

Mary
_Pokatator
_Emeritus
Posts: 1417
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:38 pm

Post by _Pokatator »

Miss Taken wrote:I'm kind of with Why me on this one.
Most of you guys will have figured out that no way in 'hell' is that the real BKP...but there might be someone surfing on the web, who actually does think it is him. That's scary....

Mary


I never thought that it was the real Boyd from the beginning, but it doesn't creep me out.

What does creep me out is when Why Me states:

I think that Boyd should change his identity since he is mocking a GA. One can be funny but I am sure that it is not funny for the real Boyd. Likewise, it would not be funny for anyone here if some individual stole our identity and began to post under our known identity. Would it?

Sorry for being a party pooper but Boyd must go....he can change his name to: Dexter P. Peabody.


I want to change his words to:

I think that Why Me should change his avatar since he is mocking a Mormon Prophet. One can be funny but I am sure that it is not funny for the real Joseph. Likewise, it would not be funny for anyone here if some individual stole your picture and began to post under your picture. Would it?

Sorry for being a party pooper but the avatar must go....he can change it to picture of: Dexter P. Peabody.


And "Why Me" for an identity sounds like such a victim and that combined with the avatar does creep me out and probably creeps out Joseph, too and all those unsuspecting web surfers that think the victim Why Me is really Joseph Smith.
_Boyd_K_Packer
_Emeritus
Posts: 49
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 10:55 pm

Post by _Boyd_K_Packer »

ajax18 wrote:President Packer,

In your many leadership duties in the Church throughout your life, have you ever been led by the spirit to motivate/castigate members of the flock by physical means, like roughing up a lazy missionary, spanking your child for not being ready for Church on time, or or maybe even carry out a blood attonement on those guilty of adultery?

One other thing I always wanted to ask. When you have a question that you need God's help to answer, are you ever not quite sure what God's answer is, or does God talk to you face to face, so that there is less ambiguity?


Young man, I am not going to answer your first questions, for disciplinary matters are to be kept confidential. We do this to protect those who are being disciplined. As for your last question, those are sacred matters which must not be discussed - you know, pearls before swine.

I would like to take this opportunity to counsel you on your hair. I notice you follow the wordly style of long hair. There is an unwrittten order of things, and long hair has been set apart for females only.

When I was at the institute of religion at Weber State, we had a little song we liked to sing. It went like this:

"Root-te-toot, Root-te-toot, we are the boys of the institute, our hair is short, above the ear, 'cuz if it's long, it means you're a queer."

Young man, there is an order to how we are to wear our hair. Men and boys are to wear their hair short, above the ear and collar. The church takes no official stance on side part versus center part. However, it has been my experience that the side part is more reverent and invites the spirit at a higher rate than the center part. As your hair thins, it is acceptable to comb it straight back, or buzz it off in the style of President Oaks. We discourage using a combover in an attept to cover the thinning parts. If your hair grays, it is acceptable to leave it gray/white like President Hinckley, or you can dye it, as President Monson does. In summary, your hair is to be short and conservative, above the collar and ear, parted on the side preferably, but a center part can be used in moderation. Buzz cuts are acceptable, and slicked straight back is permitted if your hair is thinning in front. No combovers to hide bald spots, but hair dye to cover the gray is acceptable, as President Monson set the precedent.

There is currently an ongoing debate within the leadership regarding the popular caeser style cut. Although it is short and above the ear, I find it to be irreverent. The Romans killed the savior, and I find it near apostacy to wear your hair in the style of a Roman soldier. However, many of the younger, hip apostles have no problem with the caeser style. Until this debate is resolved, if you desire to wear the caeser style, I counsel you to fast and pray for guidance.

Your personal grooming habits either invite the spirit or repel the spirit. The spirit is repulsed by the hippie and whore fashions which dominate modern culture. Please dress modestly and wear your hair in conservative styles.

I say these things in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.

Sincerely,

Boyd K. Packer
_David A. Bednar
_Emeritus
Posts: 134
Joined: Fri Mar 16, 2007 2:28 pm

Post by _David A. Bednar »

I just want to say a big "Amen" to Brother Packer's wise counsel. I have tried to follow his advice. And it is true, I do feel the spirit much more when I part my hair on the side, rather than the middle. My wife has decided to follow the same counsel and she says that she too feels the spirit much more when she parts her hair on the side.

It's a great crowd here, isn't it Boyd? The field is ripe for harvest here. That's for sure. God bless you.

Hey, Pres. Monson is sending me back to Jamaica to visit the Branch there. I love that place. Where are you off to, if I may ask?
Post Reply