The Tanners had the right to run their board as they chose

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Psssst...there's an R-rated version of that one available to subscribers only.

Jersey Girl


Where do I sign up???????


And now I'm getting an inferiority complex about not being able to come up with clever faux-moderator lines. Sigh. I'm losing my edge.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_skippy the dead
_Emeritus
Posts: 1676
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:39 am

Post by _skippy the dead »

beastie wrote:
So let me get this straight. When Mormons talk about what other people are saying, on other boards, or in newspapers, or elsewhere, they are simply running their board as they see fit and no one has the right to tell them to stop.

But when exmormons talk about what Mormons are saying, on MAD or elsewhere, they are exhibiting "exmormon entitlement".

Juliann has surrounded herself with yes-men too long. Someone on her own "side" needs to tell her to get a grip and think before she spouts. Clue Number 1: it's not a good idea to manifest a certain behavior within hours of griping about others manifesting the exact same behavior.


Hard to keep track of which board is the "obsession" board, isn't it?

Stop derailing the thread - juliann, er, Chaos, er, Momus, er, Nomos, er, Crap I can't remember what name I'm posting under
I may be going to hell in a bucket, babe / But at least I'm enjoying the ride.
-Grateful Dead (lyrics by John Perry Barlow)
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

skippy the dead wrote:Hard to keep track of which board is the "obsession" board, isn't it?


BWAHAHAHA! Good one, Skippy!!

Juliann wrote:You have no idea what they think. We only have their words and their website and if we want to "ratchet up the rhetoric" on our board we will.


Juliann (and presumably her acolytes) are entirely forgetting that this board, MormonDiscussions.com, is also her board. If she wants to be an angry Mormon or "ratchet up the rhetoric" she is just as welcome to do so here as she is there.

She's acting as if this is a territorial issue. It's not. There are no fences around MormonDiscussions.com. No one here is keeping a single MADite out. Everyone at MA&D is perfectly welcome here.
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
Post Reply