What is the worst thing for apologists to defend?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Post by _Mercury »

rcrocket wrote:
Mercury wrote:The first 911 - Mountain Meadows Massacre


I think the worst thing we have to defend is why the Church commits resources to folks who rail against the Church with spittle dripping down their chins, but retain their membership and accept home teachers appointed by the Bishop to come and spend time with them.

It seems the Church should spend its PEF resources on computer geeks who have a hard time with literacy.

rcrocket


How bout a 2 billion dollar mall that sees no possible return other than further financial obfuscation?
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Post by _Mercury »

The Nehor wrote:
Mercury wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
Mercury wrote:The first 911 - Mountain Meadows Massacre


I would think there were many atrocities before that.....huh....you really should read more history. Unless you're suggesting that they called 911...in which case there is no hope for you.


September eleventh is 911. Please do not make light of the slaughter.


Coming from the man who once started a post delighting in Joseph's death this means nothing to me.


the death of a con man bigamist - meh, no biggie

The Death Of over 150 men, women and children - just a footnote, nothing to see here

riiiiiiiiiight.
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

Mercury wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
Mercury wrote:
The Nehor wrote:
Mercury wrote:The first 911 - Mountain Meadows Massacre


I would think there were many atrocities before that.....huh....you really should read more history. Unless you're suggesting that they called 911...in which case there is no hope for you.


September eleventh is 911. Please do not make light of the slaughter.


Coming from the man who once started a post delighting in Joseph's death this means nothing to me.


the death of a con man bigamist - meh, no biggie

The Death Of over 150 men, women and children - just a footnote, nothing to see here

riiiiiiiiiight.


Hmmmm.....I would like you to point out a post where I gloated over their deaths.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

Mercury wrote:How bout a 2 billion dollar mall that sees no possible return other than further financial obfuscation?


Trying to keep an area beautiful is not a waste.
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Post by _Mercury »

The Nehor wrote:
Mercury wrote:How bout a 2 billion dollar mall that sees no possible return other than further financial obfuscation?


Trying to keep an area beautiful is not a waste.


This recent letter will be read over the pulpit on sundays:

Dear members - start housing missionaries so that we can keep downtown SLC "beautiful". Also, ignore the man behind the curtain.
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
_Blixa
_Emeritus
Posts: 8381
Joined: Fri Mar 23, 2007 12:45 pm

Post by _Blixa »

Doctor Steuss wrote:
The Nehor wrote:I think the Apologist's biggest problem is defending ground God never claimed.


Utah?


Hahahahaha!!!

I can't think of one thing that is "worse" than others since I find the whole enterprise problematic, but I suppose if I had to give an answer with a urim and thummim held to my head it would be the "priesthood ban."
From the Ernest L. Wilkinson Diaries: "ELW dreams he's spattered w/ grease. Hundreds steal his greasy pants."
_Yoda

Post by _Yoda »

1. Priesthood Ban

2. MMM

3. Polygamy
_Who Knows
_Emeritus
Posts: 2455
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:09 pm

Post by _Who Knows »

The Nehor wrote:
Doctor Steuss wrote:
The Nehor wrote:I think the Apologist's biggest problem is defending ground God never claimed.


Utah?


Don't get me started about Utah. :)

I still laugh every time I hear the words, "Zion's Bank".


Hey, back off!

I may be a countermo, but I love utah! I actually like it more now, than I did as a TBM. Sunday's in utah county are the best. I've pretty much got the place to myself.
WK: "Joseph Smith asserted that the Book of Mormon peoples were the original inhabitants of the americas"
Will Schryver: "No, he didn’t." 3/19/08
Still waiting for Will to back this up...
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

I don't think anyone's mentioned Joseph Smith' treasure digging past.

Remember when a well known apologist - I think it was nibley? - once said that if hard evidence of Joseph Smith' money digging was ever found, it would be serious trouble for the church? (obviously he underestimated both the power of True Belief and the apathy of most members)

If you really dig (hee hee) into this, you realize that if you're going to accept the apologetic notion that this was some sort of internship to being a prophet (talk about ad hoc), then you have to accept that people really CAN see slippery treasures disappearing into the earth, guarded by angry ghosts, by looking into a rock.

If you don't accept this apologia, and instead believe Joseph Smith was just being a pawn of his culture, then you have to accept he was willing to LIE about what he could see by looking into a rock.

Doesn't bode well for the Book of Mormon, which was translated by looking into a rock, either way.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Seven
_Emeritus
Posts: 998
Joined: Tue Feb 13, 2007 7:52 pm

Post by _Seven »

By "worst" thing to defend, do you mean immoral or abominable?

That would be:

1. MMM

2. polygamy:
*defending the slander of innocent women or men who refused to engage in it
*defending the lies and secrecy surrounding the practice
*defending the emotional abuse caused by both polygny and polyandry

3. racism/banning blacks from the priesthood

4. editing church history or telling lies to church members intended to mislead others, cover up for Prophets sins, etc.
"Happiness is the object and design of our existence...
That which is wrong under one circumstance, may be, and often is, right under another." Joseph Smith
Post Reply