DCP naming names again

[_3sheets2thewind]

Hey Queerie, can I suggest that you save the faux endearments for those who might appreciate them?

It's not as if there's any shortage of them around here.

Regards,
Pahoran

Really?

In the 21st century, when Pres. Hinckley taught that Mormons accept and love their Lesbian and Gay sisters and brothers, someone who holds himself out as a practicing Mormon, uses sexual identity as a slur?

Really?

Pahoran would like to think his presence here is somekind act of martyrdom, though his fanatsy is empty.

This place is like porno to pahoran, he is dog eating its own vomit when he posts here. He is no less a detriment to the faith than anyone else he would accuse.

[_Pahoran]

As I've explained on a number of occasions, I don't really mind people knowing who I am. I'd just prefer my in real life name not be searchable in connection with this forum (and some others.)

Unlike some people here, I don't have anything to hide. So I won't talk about [deleted] (do you refer to them in that style over there) if you don't canvass my in real life information. Deal?

I don't have anything to hide either, Pahoran. I don't want my real name used here for the same reason you do. I'm sure you feel that the information you are being fed is really supposed to freak me out, but there are other pending matters that are of much greater concern to certain religious organizations at the present time.

But as far as what you may or may not decide to publicly talk about, you and your fellow jihadis may want to talk to someone about false light invasion of privacy. I am happy to arrange a very, very thorough education for you on that subject if it becomes necessary.

Bring it!

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Darth J]

Look, Pahoran. I'm trying to help you. You've deftly crafted an image of being on a mindless vendetta against anyone who questions your cherished beliefs, and any normal Latter-day Saint of good conscience would be embarrassed to share guilt by association. I'm just making a gesture to help you prove that maybe you've just been having a bad day.....for four or five hundred consecutive days. Don't you deserve a chance to show that you're not on a mindless vendetta against anyone who questions your cherished beliefs that would embarrass any normal Latter-day Saint of good conscience? I think so. But we are not saved by grace alone. It is the combination of grace and works that redeems us. You wouldn't lash out at person offering you a life preserver while you were in the middle of the ocean (probably), so why not accept my pro-Mormon agenda of helping readers of this board see that Latter-day Saints are generally good and decent people, and that you're not merely taking the kamikaze approach to apologetics?

I tried giving you a chance to prove your assertions about Doctor Scratch, so we could help board readers understand that you can bring something substantive to the discussion, not just insane rage. I can only do so much though, and you appear to have rejected my help on that issue.

Would it help if we talked about something besides your deranged witch hunt against Doctor Scratch and those you recklessly assume are conspiring with him, or your relentless insistence that criticizing your cherished beliefs is analogous to pogroms against the Jews? Maybe we could pick one of the beliefs/truth claims of the Church and you could provide a substantive apologetic defense for it, perhaps with only a few homophobic slurs. How about that? Like, say, how the Book of Mormon deals with the problem of evil? Would you permit me to help you that way, since you've rejected my previous magnanimous gestures?

[_Pahoran]

Look, Pahoran. I'm trying to help you.

Sure you are.

You've deftly crafted an image of <Snip boilerplate mantra.>

No, I have not. As you perfectly well know, it is you and your fellow-haters who have "deftly crafted" that "image."

You wouldn't lash out at person offering you a life preserver while you were in the middle of the ocean (probably), so why not accept my pro-Mormon agenda of helping readers of this board see that Latter-day Saints are generally good and decent people, and that you're not merely taking the kamikaze approach to apologetics?

I'm sorry, but acceding, even silently, to the claim that you have any "pro-Mormon" intentions here would absolutely portray you in a "false light."

I tried giving you a chance to prove your assertions about Doctor Scratch, so we could help board readers understand that you can bring something substantive to the discussion, not just insane rage.

No, you did not. You attempted to embroil me in a fruitless argument about legalistic minutia in order to distract from the fact that the worthless Scratch's ongoing witch hunt is utterly indefensible.

Would it help if we talked about something besides your deranged witch hunt against Doctor Scratch

Wrong preposition. The only "deranged witch hunt" in view is being carried out by the worthless Mister Scratch and his fawning acolytes.

and those you recklessly assume are conspiring with him, or your relentless insistence that criticizing your cherished beliefs is analogous to pogroms against the Jews? Maybe we could pick one of the beliefs/truth claims of the Church and you could provide a substantive apologetic defense for it, perhaps with only a few homophobic slurs. How about that? Like, say, how the Book of Mormon deals with the problem of evil? Would you permit me to help you that way, since you've rejected my previous magnanimous gestures?

"Magnanimous gestures?" That's funny.

So I take it you're not carrying through on your empty threat.

Why am I not surprised?

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Darth J]

Pahoran, I said I may take action if necessary. I am not aware of your having done anything actionable.

Don't you think it's about time to stop allowing Scratch to completely own you, and talk about something substantive instead?

On this day of Halloween, when witches and goblins put aside their differences and celebrate in harmony, while children extort candy from their neighbors (or neighbours, to our British spelling friends), will you not accept my hand of fellowship, that critics and lurkers and faithful Latter-day Saints alike may see the good in you? That they may know that you're not the raving lunatic you have been pretending to be for so long? I know there's a tender heart underneath that hardened, world-weary exterior. It's so often that way, that the big tough guys turn out to be teddy bears full of warmth and compassion for everyone who isn't a critic of their cherished beliefs or a homosexual.

Let's talk about the teachings of the Book of Mormon or something like that. Enough with Scratch. It's Halloween, Pahoran. Behold, I stand at the door and knock. Trick or treat, Pahoran. Don't give me the trick of continuing to act like a raving street preacher with an internet connection. Please give me the treat of a substantive discussion about our shared Mormon heritage.

[_Harold Lee]

Oh my god guys freaking stop. Starve the trolls they go away.

[_Eric]

By the way, Pahoran, feel free to tell Dr. Peterson that I still have his possibly defamatory PM to me about Eric from July 2010 in my inbox. He won't mind if I share it with Eric, will he?

It would mean the world to me if you shared this with me, Darth J. Please PM me if you want to discuss this further. I've been collecting defamatory posts by Dr. Peterson for purposes I'd gladly share with you in private.

Thanks in advance.

[_Pahoran]

Pahoran, I said I may take action if necessary. I am not aware of your having done anything actionable.

Of course you're not. Your threat was empty from the get-go.

And if, instead of merely posting a quiet hint that only you would get, I were to post the entire transcript of the proceeding, your threat would still have been empty, wouldn't it?

But tell us, Darth: since you think it's just fine for the worthless Scratch to defame Dan Peterson early and often, why would telling the truth about you show you in a "false light?"

Don't you think it's about time to stop allowing Scratch to completely own you,

Reality isn't something that matters to you, I take it.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Pahoran]

By the way, Pahoran, feel free to tell Dr. Peterson that I still have his possibly defamatory PM to me about Eric from July 2010 in my inbox. He won't mind if I share it with Eric, will he?

It would mean the world to me if you shared this with me, Darth J. Please PM me if you want to discuss this further. I've been collecting defamatory posts by Dr. Peterson for purposes I'd gladly share with you in private.

Thanks in advance.

So you're desperately hoping he's got something that you could use to start your collection, are you?

I'm afraid you're likely to be disappointed. Darth was just lashing out because he's angry about something I said.

And even if he did have something you could use, he wouldn't get it to you in a timely manner anyway.

Regards,
Pahoran

[_Stormy Waters]

And if, instead of merely posting a quiet hint that only you would get, I were to post the entire transcript of the proceeding, your threat would still have been empty, wouldn't it?

But tell us, Darth: since you think it's just fine for the worthless Scratch to defame Dan Peterson early and often, why would telling the truth about you show you in a "false light?"

And here folks is why I am aynonmous. There are apologists who are more than willing to use in real life information against you.

Here it is very plainly. Pahoran can't compete with Darth J so he resorts to these kind of tactics. When push comes to shove they don't have any bones about doing it.