Is the Book of Mormon Divinely Inspired?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
Marcus
God
Posts: 6627
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: Is the Book of Mormon Divinely Inspired?

Post by Marcus »

ceeboo wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 8:10 pm
Marcus wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 6:39 pm
So you get my point, then. You are presenting your beliefs as fact, when they have not been established as fact.
No - Several times in this thread (including posts directly engaging you) I have stated that they were my views. I even said that you need not agree with my view.

Here was (in part) one of our exchanges:

ceeboo wrote:Not really, from my view. While we are all created in the image of our Creator/God, we are not all the children of God. We can become the adopted children of God and this adoption has nothing to do with our works or our merit. It has everything to do with being purchased, as broken as we were/are, by the sacrificial blood of God. We were all bought, it's up to each and every one of us to consider/recognize that and accept the path...
Marcus wrote:And this would be the path that aligns with your particular religious beliefs?
ceeboo wrote:Yes, my view (as quoted above) would in fact be my view.
Anyway, I am not interested in further exchanges about this. My views are my views and I stand by them. Should you make another reply about this, I am happy to give you the last word and leave it there.
ah ceeboo. your excerpt above was about whether all were considered 'children of god.' pulling it into this discussion over what you clearly defined as 'your path' vs. 'the (factual) path' is disingenuous.

I understand if you'd like to pull out of the discussion, but the bottom line remains, your definition of THE path is still just your opinion about what THE path is, but you have presented your opinion as though it were a fact outside of yourself.
There are no Ceeboo paths - The path back to our Creator has been provided (available for all) by the only one who could have provided it (Jesus/God)

There are no true/valid Ceeboo lines - No true/valid Joseph Smith lines - No true/valid Muhammed lines - No true/valid Watch Tower lines - No true/valid Talmudic Judaism lines - No true/valid Ron Hubbard lines. There are no true/valid lines that are drawn by any created being

The path is paved by Jesus/God - The lines are drawn by Jesus/God.
If you are withdrawing that now, thank you, i appreciate that.
I Have Questions
God
Posts: 1888
Joined: Tue May 23, 2023 9:09 am

Re: Is the Book of Mormon Divinely Inspired?

Post by I Have Questions »

ceeboo wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 8:21 pm
I Have Questions wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 7:32 pm
Does it? Where does it claim that?
Dozens and dozens of places - If you really want to know, you can google it.
The Bible states that women should be silent in Church, you believe that? Do you believe that to be God’s revealed word on the subject of women in Church?
You got me!

Having been in countless serious, deep, interesting, and thought-provoking discussions about the Bible, I have never heard such a wise and novel challenge. You're brilliant.

I am happy to give you the last word as well - and leave it at that - should you reply again.
Why run away? It was a serious and simple question. If you believe the Bible is the revealed word of God, then logically you believe the idea that women should be silent in Church is the revealed word of God.

The alternative is that you are cherry picking facets of the Bible to be the revealed word of God, and ignoring parts you don’t like.

Which is it? This is a simple question and your obvious discomfort over answering should give you pause.

——

In terms of the first point. Some unidentified authors claim their writings to be the word of God. But the Bible itself is a man-made construct, in fact there’s different “Bibles”. As such it cannot claim anything in and of itself. For instance, Paul claiming what he writes is the revealed word of God, is simply a claim by Paul, not a claim by “The Bible”.
Premise 1. Eyewitness testimony is notoriously unreliable.
Premise 2. The best evidence for the Book of Mormon is eyewitness testimony.
Conclusion. Therefore, the best evidence for the Book of Mormon is notoriously unreliable.
User avatar
Manetho
Teacher
Posts: 252
Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2021 2:28 am

Re: Is the Book of Mormon Divinely Inspired?

Post by Manetho »

ceeboo wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 2:24 pm
Rather than writing a wall of text and appearing to have a desire to win an argument and/or debate you (That is never my intention when it comes to things as monumentally serious and potentially meaningful as these things absolutely are, in my opinion) - I will simply offer a short ten-minute video for your mere consideration - should you choose to consider it (because it directly relates to your suggestion above ) and will leave it at that.

It's a Yale student asking questions of Abdu Murray (Former Muslim - Christian apologist)

https://youtu.be/D_5IM6DU2Gk?si=beWSmT-joVGzIdPD
While I could disagree with some of Murray's arguments, my more fundamental problem with arguments about an early date for the New Testament texts is that they don't prove the grandiose claims about Jesus that we find in the New Testament are true. The early centuries of the Roman Empire abounded with stories of miracle-working figures of one kind or another, and those stories surged in popularity in the exact period when the gospels started to circulate. The earliest surviving version of the gospel story makes Jesus look not all that different from other wonder-workers and apocalyptic preachers from that era who were claimed by their followers to have some kind of special connection to divinity. Because Christianity is enormously important today and the followings of those other figures died out nearly 2,000 years ago, we read the texts about Jesus in isolation without being aware of the other figures who were characterized in similar terms. But when we do read about those other figures, as this puts it, "We accept that these stories represent the kinds of things ancient people believed about great men. Or we accept that they are at least told to indicate that the man in question was great. What we don't do is accept that simply because people believed these stories that must mean they really happened."

Paradoxically, this is why I pushed back so hard against the idea that Jesus was purely mythical in Stem's threads on that topic. In the context of his time, Jesus was not special, and there's no compelling reason to believe that he was fictitious or divine.

To circle it back to the original topic of the thread, we can, very broadly speaking, see something similar in the Book of Mormon, and early Mormon beliefs in general: how they derive from specific ideas that were in wide circulation in its time. In that case, Joseph Smith was informed by beliefs about history that were popular among 19th-century American Protestants, such as the Great Apostasy, the Curse of Ham, the ideographic nature of Egyptian writing, and the myth of the mound builders. The difference is that Smith's ideas about history were subsequently proven to be laughably false, whereas the Christian ideas that I'm focusing on here are mostly things that can't be empirically tested, like theology and supernatural events.
Last edited by Manetho on Fri Sep 20, 2024 2:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
ceeboo
God
Posts: 1752
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2021 1:22 pm

Re: Is the Book of Mormon Divinely Inspired?

Post by ceeboo »

Hey Manetho
Manetho wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 9:01 pm
ceeboo wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 2:24 pm
Rather than writing a wall of text and appearing to have a desire to win an argument and/or debate you (That is never my intention when it comes to things as monumentally serious and potentially meaningful as these things absolutely are, in my opinion) - I will simply offer a short ten-minute video for your mere consideration - should you choose to consider it (because it directly relates to your suggestion above ) and will leave it at that.

It's a Yale student asking questions of Abdu Murray (Former Muslim - Christian apologist)

https://youtu.be/D_5IM6DU2Gk?si=beWSmT-joVGzIdPD
While I could disagree with some of Murray's arguments, my more fundamental problem with arguments about an early date for the New Testament texts is that they don't prove the grandiose claims about Jesus that we find in the New Testament are true.
Understood. I didn't post the video intending to address the grandiose claims about Jesus. I posted the video, specifically and directly, as a reply to an exchange I was having with someone else.

I appreciate you watching the video though.
The early centuries of the Roman Empire abounded with stories of miracle-working figures of one kind or another, and those stories surged in popularity in the exact period when the gospels started to circulate. The earliest surviving version of the gospel story makes Jesus look not all that different from other wonder-workers and apocalyptic preachers from that era who were claimed by their followers to have some kind of special connection to divinity. Because Christianity is enormously important today and the followings of those other figures died out nearly 2,000 years ago, we read the texts about Jesus in isolation without being aware of the other figures who were characterized in similar terms. But when we do read about those other figures, as this puts it, "We accept that these stories represent the kinds of things ancient people believed about great men. Or we accept that they are at least told to indicate that the man in question was great. What we don't do is accept that simply because people believed these stories that must mean they really happened."
I remember some of this while I was reading parts of that thread - especially a few of kish's posts that he made, as I always try to read his posts when I see that he had made one on the board - It was a while ago though and it was a really long thread if I am remembering correctly.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5424
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Is the Book of Mormon Divinely Inspired?

Post by MG 2.0 »

Manetho wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 9:01 pm
…my more fundamental problem with arguments about an early date for the New Testament texts is that they don't prove the grandiose claims about Jesus that we find in the New Testament are true. The early centuries of the Roman Empire abounded with stories of miracle-working figures of one kind or another, and those stories surged in popularity in the exact period when the gospels started to circulate. The earliest surviving version of the gospel story makes Jesus look not all that different from other wonder-workers and apocalyptic preachers from that era who were claimed by their followers to have some kind of special connection to divinity. Because Christianity is enormously important today and the followings of those other figures died out nearly 2,000 years ago, we read the texts about Jesus in isolation without being aware of the other figures who were characterized in similar terms.
Hi Manetho. Pre-Christ and post-Christ did any of the other belief systems and/or men that were worshipped as divinity or having connections with divinity make claims to this man or divinity being associated with or related to a “Father in Heaven?”

I could be mistaken but it seems as though Jesus may have been the first one to come along to make that claim.

I know folks here are wary of A.I. as am I (I’ve had incorrect and/or hallucinatory answers from inquiries), but here is some information retrieved in regards to this question I am asking you:

Inquiry: What does it mean to say that we are all children of a common father in heaven?

In the context of Mormonism, the phrase "we are all children of a common Father in Heaven" refers to the belief that God is the literal father of our spirits. This doctrine is often referred to as the "divine parentage" or "premortal existence."

According to Mormon theology, before we were born on Earth, we lived with God as his spirit children in a pre-mortal existence. During this time, we were taught and prepared for our earthly lives. As part of God's plan for us, we were sent to Earth to gain physical bodies, experience mortality, and learn and grow through our experiences.

The belief that we are all children of God emphasizes the idea that all people are connected through their shared spiritual heritage and that we are all part of God's family. This belief is meant to promote unity, compassion, and understanding among people, as we are all seen as brothers and sisters in a larger spiritual sense.

Inquiry: Are Mormons the only ones that believe this?

While the specific doctrine of premortal existence and divine parentage is unique to Mormonism, the broader idea that humans are children of God or connected through a shared spiritual heritage is present in many other faiths and belief systems.

For example:

1. Christianity: Many Christians believe that God is the father of all humanity and that we are created in his image. This idea is present in the Bible and is central to many Christian teachings.

2. Islam: Muslims believe that all humans are created by Allah and are part of the larger Muslim community, or Ummah.

3. Judaism: The Torah teaches that all people are descended from Adam and Eve, the first humans created by God.

4. Hinduism: Hindus believe that all beings are manifestations of the divine and are connected through their shared spiritual essence, or Atman.

While these faiths may not share the specific details of the Mormon belief in premortal existence, they all emphasize the idea that humans are connected through a shared spiritual heritage and relationship with the divine.

Inquiry: Besides Jesus Christ, what other religions or belief systems at the time of Jesus Christ believed in a God that was literally our father in heaven.

At the time of Jesus Christ, there were several religious and philosophical belief systems that held some version of the belief that humans were descended from or connected to the divine. Here are a few examples:

1. Zoroastrianism: This Persian religion, which predates Christianity, taught that humans were created by Ahura Mazda, the supreme god, and that people were meant to aid him in his battle against evil.

2. Gnosticism: Gnosticism was a diverse and complex belief system that emerged in the first few centuries after Jesus' life. Many Gnostic teachings emphasized the idea of a "divine spark" within each person, connecting them to the spiritual realm.

3. Neoplatonism: This philosophical movement, which developed in the 3rd century AD, taught that humans had a divine soul that was connected to the ultimate source of all being, known as the One.

4. Hermeticism: This esoteric belief system, which emerged in the Hellenistic period, taught that humans were part of a larger spiritual reality and could achieve enlightenment through knowledge and understanding of the divine.


Inquiry: What about in the one or 200 years before Before Christ and within the first 100 years after Christ

During the period you mentioned, there were several belief systems that included ideas about a divine connection between humans and the divine:

1. Stoicism: This philosophical school of thought, which emerged in Greece around 300 BCE, taught that humans were connected to the divine Logos, or reason, and that this connection could be cultivated through virtuous living.

2. Essenes: This Jewish sect, which existed during the time of Jesus, emphasized the idea of a spiritual brotherhood and believed that they were chosen by God to lead a pure and righteous life.

3. Mystery Cults: These religious groups, which were popular throughout the Mediterranean world during the Hellenistic and Roman periods, often emphasized the idea of union with a divine figure, such as Dionysus or Isis.

4. Pythagoreanism: This philosophical movement, which emerged in Greece around 500 BCE, taught that humans had a divine soul that was connected to the larger harmony and order of the universe.

These belief systems, along with others that emerged during this period, all shared some version of the idea that humans were connected to the divine and could cultivate that connection through various spiritual practices or ways of living.

Inquiry: But were any of these gods you’ve referred to in this conversation actually worshipped as a father in heaven in who’s image we are created?

While some of the belief systems I mentioned did emphasize a connection between humans and the divine, the specific idea of a "Father in Heaven" who created humans in his image is most closely associated with monotheistic religions like Judaism, Christianity, and Islam.

In ancient Greek and Roman religion, for example, the gods were often seen as human-like beings with specific roles or areas of influence, but they were not necessarily viewed as creators or father figures in the same way that the God of the Abrahamic religions is. Similarly, many of the mystery cults emphasized union with a divine figure, but these figures were often understood as archetypes or personifications of natural forces, rather than as a personal creator or father.

That being said, some of the philosophical movements of the time, such as Stoicism and Pythagoreanism, did emphasize the idea of a divine Logos or rational order that was present in all things, including humans. However, this concept was not necessarily understood in the same way as the "Father in Heaven" of the Abrahamic religions.

Inquiry: Did the teachings of Jesus differ from these other belief systems in that he taught of a father in heaven?

Yes, the teachings of Jesus about God as a "Father in Heaven" were indeed distinct from many of the other belief systems that were present in the ancient Mediterranean world. While some of these systems emphasized a connection between humans and the divine, the specific idea of a personal, loving, and compassionate God who created humans in his image was a unique and powerful aspect of Jesus' message.

In the Gospels, Jesus frequently refers to God as his "Father" and teaches his followers to pray to God as "Our Father in Heaven." He emphasizes the idea that God is a personal and loving creator who cares deeply about his children and desires a relationship with them.

This emphasis on a personal, loving God was in contrast to many of the other belief systems of the time, which often emphasized a more impersonal or detached relationship between humans and the divine. Jesus' teachings about a Father in Heaven were a key aspect of his message and helped to distinguish his teachings from other religious and philosophical movements of the time.

Inquiry: Were these teachings known and received in the very first years of Christianity and at the time Jesus taught his disciples?

Yes, the teachings of Jesus about God as a loving and personal Father in Heaven were present from the very beginning of Christianity and were central to the message that Jesus shared with his disciples. In fact, the earliest written records of Jesus' life and teachings, the Gospels, contain numerous references to God as a loving and compassionate Father.

For example, in the Sermon on the Mount, which is recorded in the Gospel of Matthew, Jesus teaches his followers to pray to God as "Our Father in Heaven" and emphasizes the importance of forgiveness and love as central aspects of God's character. Similarly, in the Gospel of John, Jesus frequently refers to God as his Father and emphasizes the intimate relationship between himself and the Father.

It's worth noting that the concept of God as a Father in Heaven was not entirely new to Judaism at the time of Jesus, as there are references to God as a father figure in the Hebrew scriptures. However, Jesus' emphasis on God's personal and loving nature was a distinctive aspect of his teachings and helped to shape the development of early Christianity.
Might we consider that Jesus was a ‘one off’ in relation to all the other gods and goddesses and divine ‘man gods’ and miracle workers during, before, and after Christ walked the earth?

He made the claim of being related and/or associated with his “Father in Heaven”. And He taught that we should worship and obey this same Father God.

Regards,
MG
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 7839
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: Is the Book of Mormon Divinely Inspired?

Post by Moksha »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 11:25 pm
Might we consider that Jesus was a ‘one off’ in relation to all the other gods and goddesses and divine ‘man gods’ and miracle workers during, before, and after Christ walked the earth?

He made the claim of being related and/or associated with his “Father in Heaven”. And He taught that we should worship and obey this same Father God.

Regards,
MG
MG, if you were Muslim you would be saying this about Allah and one of his prophets Jesus.

Anyway, what about Joseph Smith and his part in the pre-earthly Divine Council along with the Buddha, Krishna, Manitou, Jesus, and his bro Lucifer?
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
User avatar
Morley
God
Posts: 2220
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 6:17 pm
Location: Amedeo Modigliani, Woman with Red Hair (1917)

Re: Is the Book of Mormon Divinely Inspired?

Post by Morley »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 11:25 pm

Hi Manetho. Pre-Christ and post-Christ did any of the other belief systems and/or men that were worshipped as divinity or having connections with divinity make claims to this man or divinity being associated with or related to a “Father in Heaven?”

I could be mistaken but it seems as though Jesus may have been the first one to come along to make that claim.
MG, what specific claim are you suggesting that Jesus made?

MG 2.0 wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 11:25 pm
He made the claim of being related and/or associated with his “Father in Heaven”. And He taught that we should worship and obey this same Father God.
Every prophet claims association with God. Every prophet teaches that we should obey God.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5424
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Is the Book of Mormon Divinely Inspired?

Post by MG 2.0 »

Moksha wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 11:38 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 11:25 pm
Might we consider that Jesus was a ‘one off’ in relation to all the other gods and goddesses and divine ‘man gods’ and miracle workers during, before, and after Christ walked the earth?

He made the claim of being related and/or associated with his “Father in Heaven”. And He taught that we should worship and obey this same Father God.

Regards,
MG
MG, if you were Muslim you would be saying this about Allah and one of his prophets Jesus.
The Axial Religions (see Karen Armstrong) or Abrahamic covenant religions do have their roots in ‘one God’ worship. That came first. Jesus came and taught the gospel of salvation and gave further light and knowledge as to our relationship to God as our Father and our obligation to follow all of His commandments. A higher law. At the time that Jesus was coming into the world it appears that the relationship of humanity to a Father in Heaven was and/or had not been fully given/taught.

Jesus was the One.

He taught humanity concerning the one God that is worshipped as our Father in Heaven. He taught us how to pray to that same Father. Had this ever been done by any of the other mystics, men/gods, or healers?
Moksha wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 11:38 pm
Anyway, what about Joseph Smith and his part in the pre-earthly Divine Council along with the Buddha, Krishna, Manitou, Jesus, and his bro Lucifer?
What about it? If you want to go off on that…feel free to do so. :)

Regards,
MG
Last edited by MG 2.0 on Fri Sep 20, 2024 1:03 am, edited 1 time in total.
MG 2.0
God
Posts: 5424
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2021 4:45 pm

Re: Is the Book of Mormon Divinely Inspired?

Post by MG 2.0 »

Morley wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 11:39 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 11:25 pm

Hi Manetho. Pre-Christ and post-Christ did any of the other belief systems and/or men that were worshipped as divinity or having connections with divinity make claims to this man or divinity being associated with or related to a “Father in Heaven?”

I could be mistaken but it seems as though Jesus may have been the first one to come along to make that claim.
MG, what specific claim are you suggesting that Jesus made?
I think that is rather self evident from what I’ve already said.
Morley wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 11:39 pm
MG 2.0 wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 11:25 pm
He made the claim of being related and/or associated with his “Father in Heaven”. And He taught that we should worship and obey this same Father God.
Every prophet claims association with God. Every prophet teaches that we should obey God.
Jesus was different. Read the New Testament again.

Regards,
MG
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 7839
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: Is the Book of Mormon Divinely Inspired?

Post by Moksha »

MG 2.0 wrote:
Fri Sep 20, 2024 12:59 am
Moksha wrote:
Thu Sep 19, 2024 11:38 pm
Anyway, what about Joseph Smith and his part in the pre-earthly Divine Council along with the Buddha, Krishna, Manitou, Jesus, and his bro Lucifer?
What about it? If you want to go off on that…feel free to do so. :)

Regards,
MG
I just thought it was a fascinating concept from the first time I heard it, much like the LDS idea that Joseph Smith had been ordained to the office of Holy Ghost. Sort of miss insights like that from the FAIR board.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Post Reply