Three Powerful Books

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_mentalgymnast
_Emeritus
Posts: 8574
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:39 pm

Re: Three Powerful Books

Post by _mentalgymnast »

Themis wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 5:08 pm
Critics use the arguments against polygamy as another grievance to put in the bucket of issues I mentioned up thread.
They are just being consistent in their condemnation where you are not. How are they different MG. You have never said. That would seem to be important in making a reasonable position of why Joseph should be seen differently than all the others you condemn.
If you went to the link I provided (one of many):

http://www.conflictofjustice.com/joseph ... -polygamy/

...it can be shown that your premise is unjustified. You would have to show that Joseph had his own personal motivations for following the law of plural marriage rather than instituting a doctrinally driven commandment.

Why would Joseph be judged differently? The fruits of the restoration. What are the ‘good fruits’ (in large measure) that have come forth from others that have had multiple wives outside of the CofJCofLDS?

Back to Doc’s bucket list. I think that simply creating a list and then assuming it has ‘weight’ is a rather flimsy hat rack to hang your hat on. Notice that he didn’t have much to say in response to my rather lengthy post in which I demonstrated that his issues, and many others that he didn’t list, are not slam dunks. In his mind, however, making a list is a point in his favor because a list, by inference/nature, seems to have weight.

Regards,
MG
_Morley
_Emeritus
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Three Powerful Books

Post by _Morley »

mentalgymnast wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 4:32 pm

Apparently I didn’t make myself clear. Facts do matter and one must go where the facts lead. One my have a bias towards belief in the restoration narrative, for example. If the facts overwhelmingly lead towards questioning the foundational claims of that narrative then an honest person would have to re-evaluate their position.

Doc posted a list of twelve issues that for him fill the bucket of unbelief to the point where the bucket tips over. I went through the same list and explained, in summary form, why that list doesn’t have the weight that he puts to it. He sees the list as a support for his confirmation bias. Even if contrary evidence or alternate ways of viewing evidence come before him. His ways are set in cement. As are yours.

On the other hand, if I was to see overwhelmingly convincing evidence that LDS truth claims were bogus I would leave my personal biases behind and become agnostic towards Mormonism. But I honestly don’t see the preponderance of evidence leading to disbelief.


You talk like know that Doc has confirmation bias but that you also know that you don't. How did you arrive at this?

.
_mentalgymnast
_Emeritus
Posts: 8574
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:39 pm

Re: Three Powerful Books

Post by _mentalgymnast »

Morley wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 5:57 pm
mentalgymnast wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 4:32 pm

Apparently I didn’t make myself clear. Facts do matter and one must go where the facts lead. One my have a bias towards belief in the restoration narrative, for example. If the facts overwhelmingly lead towards questioning the foundational claims of that narrative then an honest person would have to re-evaluate their position.

Doc posted a list of twelve issues that for him fill the bucket of unbelief to the point where the bucket tips over. I went through the same list and explained, in summary form, why that list doesn’t have the weight that he puts to it. He sees the list as a support for his confirmation bias. Even if contrary evidence or alternate ways of viewing evidence come before him. His ways are set in cement. As are yours.

On the other hand, if I was to see overwhelmingly convincing evidence that LDS truth claims were bogus I would leave my personal biases behind and become agnostic towards Mormonism. But I honestly don’t see the preponderance of evidence leading to disbelief.


You talk like know that Doc has confirmation bias...
Would you be comfortable saying that he doesn’t?
...but that you also know that you don't. How did you arrive at this?
I think I’ve been rather clear and have come clean on this point if you go back and contextually read my posts.

Do you think Doc...and yourself for that matter...are free from confirmation bias?

Regards,
MG
_Morley
_Emeritus
Posts: 3542
Joined: Mon Apr 25, 2011 6:19 pm

Re: Three Powerful Books

Post by _Morley »

mentalgymnast wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 6:27 pm
Morley wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 5:57 pm


You talk like know that Doc has confirmation bias...
Would you be comfortable saying that he doesn’t?
...but that you also know that you don't. How did you arrive at this?
I think I’ve been rather clear and have come clean on this point if you go back and contextually read my posts.

Do you think Doc...and yourself for that matter...are free from confirmation bias?

Regards,
MG
In that post, you seemed to be saying that Doc has confirmation bias and I have confirmation bias but that you don't.
_honorentheos
_Emeritus
Posts: 11104
Joined: Thu Feb 04, 2010 5:17 am

Re: Three Powerful Books

Post by _honorentheos »

mentalgymnast wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 4:32 pm
On the other hand, if I was to see overwhelmingly convincing evidence that LDS truth claims were bogus I would leave my personal biases behind and become agnostic towards Mormonism.
This is exactly how confirmation bias works. You approach evidence that contradicts your current belief with the question, "MUST I believe this?" while evidence that supports your current belief is filtered through the question, "CAN I believe this?"

The thing you should have learned is it is nearly impossible to accomplish overwhelming that bias with evidence because we are very, very good at finding ways to call the evidence into question so we don't feel like we are obligated to accept the evidence as overturning our prior held belief.

You just acknowledged you aren't engaging with evidence to find truth.

So let's work on that. Let's list out a few statements regarding the foundations of Mormonism. Then, I'd like to ask that you assign the probability of that statement being justified belief as supported by evidence(being true if you like). Let's keep it simple using the following scale:

0% - This is proven wrong to such a high degree of confidence it's impossible for new evidence to come that could overcome that level of confidence it is a false statement.

10% - Highly confident it's a false statement such that it's impossible to see how it could be a justified belief, but theoretically evidence could turn up proves it is, in fact, justified to believe.

25% - Confident it's a false statement but evidence could turn up proves it is, in fact, justified to belief.

50% - Not confidence that it is justified to believe it or disbelieve it.

75% - Confident it's justified to believe the statement but evidence could turn up proves it is, in fact, a false statement.

90% - Highly confident it's justified to believe the statement such that it's impossible to see how it could be a false statement but theoretically evidence could turn up proves it is, in fact, false.

100% - This is proven true to such a high degree of confidence it's impossible for new evidence to come that could overcome that level of confidence it is a true statement.

Here are the statements. Don't bother with evidnec for or against just yet. Focus on the probability it's justified to believe the statement as provided. I'll share mine as well.

1. Joseph Smith had sexual relations with women other than Emma Smith while being married to Emma Smith.

2. Joseph Smith hid having extramarital consensual sexual activity from Emma Smith at least some of the time he was engaging in having sex with women other than Emma Smith.

3. No known historic population of Native Americans matches the description of the Nephites as given in the Book of Mormon, statements from Joseph Smith, and taught by the LDS church over the pulpit.

4. No historic population of Native Americans, known or unknown to modern archeology, matches the description of the Nephites as given in the Book of Mormon, statements from Joseph Smith, and taught by the LDS church over the pulpit.

5. The facsimiles in the Book of Abraham show an attempt to translate Egyptian hieroglyphics that does not match the translation of EH discovered and published after Church's release of the Book of Abraham.

6. There is an active intelligent force to whom responsibility for the existence of the Universe as we observe it could be assigned.

7. There is a God who literally fathered the spirits of every person who has or will live on the Earth, and humankind is a physical embodiment of the form of God as a tabernacle for a spirit child of God created in His image.

8. God loves us.

9. The figure known as Jesus Christ is literally the offspring of God in that a human woman gave birth to Jesus while his father in the biological sense was God.

10. The stories about Jesus contained in the New Testament are largely historically accurate and can be trusted in their broad strokes even if the details may be misrepresented.

11. Jesus died and was resurrected from the dead.

12. The culture of Mormonism is a good environmental in which to raise a family.

13. The authority to act on God's behalf on Earth is gendered for purposes that are according to Gods plan, and for the good of His children.

14. Joseph Smith saw God the Father and Jesus Christ after praying to ask which church he should join.

.......

My answers:

1. 90%
2. 90%
3. 90%
4. 75%
5. 90%
6. 50%
7. 10%
8. 50%
9. 10%
10. 25%
11. 10%
12. 25%
13. 0%
14. 10%
The world is always full of the sound of waves..but who knows the heart of the sea, a hundred feet down? Who knows it's depth?
~ Eiji Yoshikawa
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Three Powerful Books

Post by _Themis »

mentalgymnast wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 5:54 pm
Themis wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 5:08 pm



They are just being consistent in their condemnation where you are not. How are they different MG. You have never said. That would seem to be important in making a reasonable position of why Joseph should be seen differently than all the others you condemn.
If you went to the link I provided (one of many):

http://www.conflictofjustice.com/joseph ... -polygamy/

...it can be shown that your premise is unjustified. You would have to show that Joseph had his own personal motivations for following the law of plural marriage rather than instituting a doctrinally driven commandment.
No it doesn't show it is unjustified. It cherry picks sources and avoids the other ones. It reinterprets ones it doesn't like. When I look at motivations I look at actions and behaviors. The same actions and behaviors we see from other religious leaders. The motivation is sex and power. Sex is a huge driver and motivation for why people do a lot of bad things. Josephs actions cannot be shown to be any different then all the others. So then I ask would God send and angel and force Joseph to marry other women, while at the same time do nothing for women like Emma. That is a big nope. The Book of Abraham PROVES Joseph smith a fraud as well as the Book of Mormon. Polygamy is just more evidence he is just a human, like so many others who wants power and sex. I love how so many of these frauds like to pretend they don't really want to have sex with many women or men. I suspect Joseph didn't have a hard time convincing some of the men to take multiple wives. :twisted:
42
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Three Powerful Books

Post by _Themis »

mentalgymnast wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 5:54 pm


If you went to the link I provided (one of many):

http://www.conflictofjustice.com/joseph ... -polygamy/

...it can be shown that your premise is unjustified. You would have to show that Joseph had his own personal motivations for following the law of plural marriage rather than instituting a doctrinally driven commandment.
No it doesn't show it is unjustified. It cherry picks sources and avoids the other ones. It reinterprets ones it doesn't like. When I look at motivations I look at actions and behaviors. The same actions and behaviors we see from other religious leaders. The motivation is sex and power. Sex is a huge driver and motivation for why people do a lot of bad things. Josephs actions cannot be shown to be any different then all the others. So then I ask would God send and angel and force Joseph to marry other women, while at the same time do nothing for women like Emma. That is a big nope. The Book of Abraham PROVES Joseph smith a fraud as well as the Book of Mormon. Polygamy is just more evidence he is just a human, like so many others who wants power and sex. I love how so many of these frauds like to pretend they don't really want to have sex with many women or men. I suspect Joseph didn't have a hard time convincing some of the men to take multiple wives. :twisted:

Back to Doc’s bucket list. I think that simply creating a list and then assuming it has ‘weight’ is a rather flimsy hat rack to hang your hat on. Notice that he didn’t have much to say in response to my rather lengthy post in which I demonstrated that his issues, and many others that he didn’t list, are not slam dunks. In his mind, however, making a list is a point in his favor because a list, by inference/nature, seems to have weight.
No you did not deal with his bucket list. You didn't demonstrate they were not slam dunks. The Book of Abraham is a slam dunk. One that you have never learned all the issues surrounding it. You need a lot more then a lengthy post, which I understand one may not want to take that kind of time to find the truth.
42
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: Three Powerful Books

Post by _Themis »

mentalgymnast wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 6:27 pm
Do you think Doc...and yourself for that matter...are free from confirmation bias?

Regards,
MG
You are still avoiding the fact most former believers had confirmation bias in favor of LDS church truth claims but changed their views on what evidence they saw.
42
_mentalgymnast
_Emeritus
Posts: 8574
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:39 pm

Re: Three Powerful Books

Post by _mentalgymnast »

honorentheos wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 6:55 pm

1. Joseph Smith had sexual relations with women other than Emma Smith while being married to Emma Smith.

2. Joseph Smith hid having extramarital consensual sexual activity from Emma Smith at least some of the time he was engaging in having sex with women other than Emma Smith.

3. No known historic population of Native Americans matches the description of the Nephites as given in the Book of Mormon, statements from Joseph Smith, and taught by the LDS church over the pulpit.

4. No historic population of Native Americans, known or unknown to modern archeology, matches the description of the Nephites as given in the Book of Mormon, statements from Joseph Smith, and taught by the LDS church over the pulpit.

5. The facsimiles in the Book of Abraham show an attempt to translate Egyptian hieroglyphics that does not match the translation of EH discovered and published after Church's release of the Book of Abraham.

6. There is an active intelligent force to whom responsibility for the existence of the Universe as we observe it could be assigned.

7. There is a God who literally fathered the spirits of every person who has or will live on the Earth, and humankind is a physical embodiment of the form of God as a tabernacle for a spirit child of God created in His image.

8. God loves us.

9. The figure known as Jesus Christ is literally the offspring of God in that a human woman gave birth to Jesus while his father in the biological sense was God.

10. The stories about Jesus contained in the New Testament are largely historically accurate and can be trusted in their broad strokes even if the details may be misrepresented.

11. Jesus died and was resurrected from the dead.

12. The culture of Mormonism is a good environmental in which to raise a family.

13. The authority to act on God's behalf on Earth is gendered for purposes that are according to Gods plan, and for the good of His children.

14. Joseph Smith saw God the Father and Jesus Christ after praying to ask which church he should join.
1. 90%
2. 90%
3. 90%
4. 90%
5. 90% (based on what I know)
6. 90-100%
7. 50-75%
8. 100%
9. 75%
10. 25-50%
11. 90%
12. 100%. (with the caveat that there will be individuals that for one reason or another will not want to adhere to or conform to LDS living standards).
13. 90%
14. 90%

Most of my answers to your either/or or somewhere in between statements are anchored to number 6.

That was fun! Thanks for taking the time to come up with the list.

Regards,
MG
_mentalgymnast
_Emeritus
Posts: 8574
Joined: Sat Jun 01, 2013 9:39 pm

Re: Three Powerful Books

Post by _mentalgymnast »

Themis wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 9:50 pm
mentalgymnast wrote:
Sat Aug 15, 2020 6:27 pm
Do you think Doc...and yourself for that matter...are free from confirmation bias?

Regards,
MG
You are still avoiding the fact most former believers had confirmation bias in favor of LDS church truth claims but changed their views on what evidence they saw.
I get that. It kind of goes without saying. Otherwise you wouldn’t have jumped ship.

Regards,
MG
Post Reply