Religion and Manipulation

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

Come on, Wade---you may as well admit you were wrong. Either you are feeding the information to juliann, or she is feeding you this baloney accusation that we are "talking behind her back." Regardless, there is no secret whispering going on. And you know it. So go ahead and cough up that apology already. I'll be waiting.


That'll happen when hell freezes over.

by the way, in these exchanges with Juliann, Wade, did you chastise her about the genuinely "behind the back" talking that goes on in the private email loop?
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Post by _wenglund »

beastie wrote:
Come on, Wade---you may as well admit you were wrong. Either you are feeding the information to juliann, or she is feeding you this baloney accusation that we are "talking behind her back." Regardless, there is no secret whispering going on. And you know it. So go ahead and cough up that apology already. I'll be waiting.


That'll happen when hell freezes over.

by the way, in these exchanges with Juliann, Wade, did you chastise her about the genuinely "behind the back" talking that goes on in the private email loop?


What "behind the back" talking are you referring to? I ask because I am not personally aware of any. Perhaps I was out of the supposed "loop".

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

What "behind the back" talking are you referring to? I ask because I am not personally aware of any. Perhaps I was out of the supposed "loop".


Yes, I stated in my first post on the subject that you are undoubtedly out of the loop. But that shouldn't stop you from trying to get to the bottom of it. Does a private email group exist among certain MADs? Are personalities sometimes discussed in this group, which would really BE "behind the backs"? For someone as fair and balanced as you are, it seems you would want to investigate, and chastise if need be.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_OUT OF MY MISERY
_Emeritus
Posts: 922
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:32 pm

Post by _OUT OF MY MISERY »

beastie wrote:
What "behind the back" talking are you referring to? I ask because I am not personally aware of any. Perhaps I was out of the supposed "loop".


Yes, I stated in my first post on the subject that you are undoubtedly out of the loop. But that shouldn't stop you from trying to get to the bottom of it. Does a private email group exist among certain MADs? Are personalities sometimes discussed in this group, which would really BE "behind the backs"? For someone as fair and balanced as you are, it seems you would want to investigate, and chastise if need be.



Fair and Balanced ...don't you mean Fox news????

You can't possibly be talking about Wade can you???

Yes there is private e-mail group on MAD there was on FAIR...I was complained about all the time
When I wake up I will be hungry....but this feels so good right now aaahhhhhh........
_wenglund
_Emeritus
Posts: 4947
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 7:25 pm

Post by _wenglund »

beastie wrote:
What "behind the back" talking are you referring to? I ask because I am not personally aware of any. Perhaps I was out of the supposed "loop".


Yes, I stated in my first post on the subject that you are undoubtedly out of the loop. But that shouldn't stop you from trying to get to the bottom of it. Does a private email group exist among certain MADs? Are personalities sometimes discussed in this group, which would really BE "behind the backs"? For someone as fair and balanced as you are, it seems you would want to investigate, and chastise if need be.


I am not privy to that PRIVATE email group, so I can't say what may or may not be going on there. And, I am not inclined to investigate based on your speculations (which ironically do the very thing you accuse them of), nor am I the least concerned with what may be going on in PRIVATE. My concern is with PUBLIC back-biting, and more particularly with back-biting that is directed towards members of my faith. Consequently, and admittedly, in that narrow sense I am not fair and balanced, nor do I believe it in my interest to be.

But, I am please to see you express some value for the notions of fair and balance, even though you are anything but fair and balanced in your approach. Perhaps, though, your voicing that value may germinate that wonderful seed and sometime in the future chance blossom into a flower of fairness and balance in you. Again, miracles do happen.

Thanks, -Wade Englund-
Post Reply