The Dude is suspended from MAD. Is this "goading"

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Mister Scratch
_Emeritus
Posts: 5604
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:13 pm

Post by _Mister Scratch »

rcrocket wrote:In any event, by definition one cannot assert ad hominem arguments against anonymous posters.

rcrocket


That just isn't correct, Bob, and you know it. We've been over this before, in fact. Ad hominem arguments involve shifting the discussion to the rhetor's character and away from the argument. So, whenever you halt the discussion at hand in order to say, "Well, you're anonymous and a coward," you are engaging in ad hominem attack, since your are diverting the discussion off onto character, rather than dealing with the argument at hand. You ought to have figured this out by now.
_Bryan Inks
_Emeritus
Posts: 324
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 5:03 pm

Post by _Bryan Inks »

harmony wrote:
It occurs to me . . . wrote:
asbestosman wrote:Dr. Peterson already answered on that thread. It appears I was right. Dr. Peterson did not intend to do a review in that thread. He only offered information about someone else who had and who he seems to hold some degree of respect for.

In other words, Dr. Peterson didn't just pull down a review from the internet. Dr. Peterson has reason to believe that the reviewer knows what he's talking about.


My purpose in bringing this information here, was not to discuss Dr. Peterson's response or lack thereof. I don't have a problem with that. It just seemed to be such on over reaction on the part of the moderators. I don't see how dialogue can continue if you are disciplined for asking whether or not someone has read a book.


What ever gave you the idea that MAD board was about dialogue?


Well, as we all know, if something is in the name of the organization than the organization must be focused on that.

Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Moron Apologetics and Discussion. Now this one is a bit of a stretch because it isn't quite dialogue, but discussion can be used as a synonym of dialogue.
_asbestosman
_Emeritus
Posts: 6215
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 10:32 pm

Post by _asbestosman »

It occurs to me . . . wrote:My purpose in bringing this information here, was not to discuss Dr. Peterson's response or lack thereof. I don't have a problem with that. It just seemed to be such on over reaction on the part of the moderators. I don't see how dialogue can continue if you are disciplined for asking whether or not someone has read a book.

I tried to address that as well. I think the mods simply misinterpreted intent. It didn't help that The Dude called the review preaching to the choir. Again, the tone would likely have seemed better to the mods had The Dude left off "Yes/No".
That's General Leo. He could be my friend if he weren't my enemy.
eritis sicut dii
I support NCMO
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

asbestosman wrote:
It occurs to me . . . wrote:My purpose in bringing this information here, was not to discuss Dr. Peterson's response or lack thereof. I don't have a problem with that. It just seemed to be such on over reaction on the part of the moderators. I don't see how dialogue can continue if you are disciplined for asking whether or not someone has read a book.

I tried to address that as well. I think the mods simply misinterpreted intent. It didn't help that The Dude called the review preaching to the choir. Again, the tone would likely have seemed better to the mods had The Dude left off "Yes/No".


When people communicate with me, it's easy to tell the difference between when they're blowing smoke up my skirt and when they're sincere. That isn't a difficult task. I despise it when someone tries to blow smoke. It irritates me no end. Do they think I don't notice? Why do they do that? Because they think I need to be handled with kid gloves or maybe I don't value plain speaking? It's a ridiculous way to communicate.

The same goes for Daniel and the MAD mods. What kind of Mickeymouse communication is it, when adults have to bend the knee and go into contortions in order to ask a frickin' question? Why shouldn't The Dude just ask "Yes/No"? It's what he wanted to know! It's an easy question, not at all complicated, requiring very little thought to answer. Why the need to bend his knee and make himself into an imitation pretzel in order to find out the answer to a straightforward question? MAD is not the Board Room. What a humiliation. I'm glad I don't even read it. I can count on Mr Scratch to bring the best bits here, so I can see the continued stupidity that passes for conversation there, but really... there's a limit to the amount of knee-bending anyone should have to do in order to ask a frickin' question.
_Pokatator
_Emeritus
Posts: 1417
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 12:38 pm

Post by _Pokatator »

For all the unbanned posters still posting at MAD...

Scott Lloyd wrote:
At the risk of incurring the annoyance of the moderators, I am opening this thread to respond to a post from Matt Andrews in the “What is Up?” thread that I didn't see before the thread was closed.

I do this not to circumvent a moderator decision. And, at the moment, I don't intend to carry it beyond this single post.

I do it only because the post was addressed to me personally and I feel it merits a response.

I beg and appreciate in advance the indulgence of the moderators on this matter. As far as I am concerned, they are welcome to close this thread immediately, with this being the only post in the thread.


Scotty sure seems to have bootlicking, brown nosing, ___kissing and begging down to a science, how pathetic. Maybe Scotty could give lessons or write a primer on how to demean yourself before the MADMod Gods?
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Pokatator wrote:
Scotty sure seems to have bootlicking, brown nosing, ___kissing and begging down to a science, how pathetic. Maybe Scotty could give lessons or write a primer on how to demean yourself before the MADMod Gods?


I think they're about 2 weeks away from changing the name to "Mormon Ass-kissing & Groveling Board"
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Pokatator wrote:For all the unbanned posters still posting at MAD...

Scott Lloyd wrote:
At the risk of incurring the annoyance of the moderators, I am opening this thread to respond to a post from Matt Andrews in the “What is Up?” thread that I didn't see before the thread was closed.

I do this not to circumvent a moderator decision. And, at the moment, I don't intend to carry it beyond this single post.

I do it only because the post was addressed to me personally and I feel it merits a response.

I beg and appreciate in advance the indulgence of the moderators on this matter. As far as I am concerned, they are welcome to close this thread immediately, with this being the only post in the thread.


Scotty sure seems to have bootlicking, brown nosing, ___kissing and begging down to a science, how pathetic. Maybe Scotty could give lessons or write a primer on how to demean yourself before the MADMod Gods?


What is up with the begging and hyperdefensiveness on the part of Scott Lloyd? It's a FREAKING MESSAGE BOARD. Is he asking them to donate a kidney or something?

Jersey Girl
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Jersey Girl wrote:
What is up with the begging and hyperdefensiveness on the part of Scott Lloyd? It's a FREAKING MESSAGE BOARD. Is he asking them to donate a kidney or something?

Jersey Girl


He could just setting a good example for the rest of the sheep.

Honestly the MAD board is kinda like the movie Psycho right after the shower scene. You honestly don't know where in the hell it's going or who could get axed next.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_Jersey Girl
_Emeritus
Posts: 34407
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 1:16 am

Post by _Jersey Girl »

Bond...James Bond wrote:
Jersey Girl wrote:
What is up with the begging and hyperdefensiveness on the part of Scott Lloyd? It's a FREAKING MESSAGE BOARD. Is he asking them to donate a kidney or something?

Jersey Girl


He could just setting a good example for the rest of the sheep.

Honestly the MAD board is kinda like the movie Psycho right after the shower scene. You honestly don't know where in the hell it's going or who could get axed next.


It's starting to give the appearance of an alternate reality. You know...delusional.

Jersey Girl
Failure is not falling down but refusing to get up.
Chinese Proverb
_moksha
_Emeritus
Posts: 22508
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 8:42 pm

Post by _moksha »

Jersey Girl wrote:It's starting to give the appearance of an alternate reality. You know...delusional.

Jersey Girl

You rang?

Pokatator wrote:]Scotty sure seems to have boot licking, brown nosing, ___kissing and begging down to a science, how pathetic. Maybe Scotty could give lessons or write a primer on how to demean yourself before the MAD Mod Gods?

I imagine the troops around Caligula seemed the same way, but they simply wished to survive.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Post Reply