DCP posting personal information of Cody Temple critics

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
Philo Sofee
God
Posts: 5425
Joined: Thu Oct 29, 2020 1:18 am

Re: DCP posting personal information of Cody Temple critics

Post by Philo Sofee »

Gadianton wrote:
Sat Sep 09, 2023 9:01 pm
Does he understand that the folks of Cody have banned him from their page for the same reasons he bans critics from SeN?
You should live so long...
User avatar
Moksha
God
Posts: 7755
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 3:13 am
Location: Koloburbia

Re: DCP posting personal information of Cody Temple critics

Post by Moksha »

Gadianton wrote:
Sat Sep 09, 2023 9:01 pm
Does he understand that the folks of Cody have banned him from their page for the same reasons he bans critics from SeN?
When Dr. Peterson banned me, he intimated that he did so reluctantly but it was necessary to keep the peace with the more quarrelsome board members like Dr. Midgley. Perhaps there is a Midgley-like character in the Cody group who reacted strongly to Dr. Peterson for his proximity to the Church. They perhaps sensed some duplicity on the part of the Church and just assumed Dr. Peterson was part of it.

It is a shame about banning, when Gemli left it took the zest out of SeN. Now it is a duller round of dittos with some right-wing politics added.
Cry Heaven and let loose the Penguins of Peace
Marcus
God
Posts: 6573
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: DCP posting personal information of Cody Temple critics

Post by Marcus »

I retained the ability to post “Wow” emojis, from one of my three Facebook accounts. I used it, typically, to highlight comments there that, instead of raising potentially legitimate issues such lighting, zoning, traffic, and steeple height, expressed either overt or implicit hostility to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (in the latter case, for example, by declaring that no temple, no matter its design or specific site, should ever be permitted in Cody at all). But the good folks at POCN have closed that dangerous loophole.
How convenient Peterson says he 'typically" used his emojie powers this way, because his st a tement above is not true.

I looked at the site, and i saw a lot of his wow face on a lot of comments specifically dealing with the legitimate issues. He really can't be trusted to give an honest explanation of any of his behaviors. No wonder he was banned.
User avatar
malkie
God
Posts: 1657
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:41 pm

Re: DCP posting personal information of Cody Temple critics

Post by malkie »

Marcus wrote:
Sun Sep 10, 2023 3:17 pm
I retained the ability to post “Wow” emojis, from one of my three Facebook accounts. I used it, typically, to highlight comments there that, instead of raising potentially legitimate issues such lighting, zoning, traffic, and steeple height, expressed either overt or implicit hostility to the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (in the latter case, for example, by declaring that no temple, no matter its design or specific site, should ever be permitted in Cody at all). But the good folks at POCN have closed that dangerous loophole.
How convenient Peterson says he 'typically" used his emojie powers this way, because his st a tement above is not true.

I looked at the site, and i saw a lot of his wow face on a lot of comments specifically dealing with the legitimate issues. He really can't be trusted to give an honest explanation of any of his behaviors. No wonder he was banned.
Guaranteed that he would dismiss your comment based on his use of "Typically".
You can help Ukraine by talking for an hour a week!! PM me, or check www.enginprogram.org for details.
Слава Україні!, 𝑺𝒍𝒂𝒗𝒂 𝑼𝒌𝒓𝒂𝒊𝒏𝒊!
User avatar
Rivendale
God
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:21 pm

Re: DCP posting personal information of Cody Temple critics

Post by Rivendale »

Moksha wrote:
Sun Sep 10, 2023 6:21 am
Gadianton wrote:
Sat Sep 09, 2023 9:01 pm
Does he understand that the folks of Cody have banned him from their page for the same reasons he bans critics from SeN?
When Dr. Peterson banned me, he intimated that he did so reluctantly but it was necessary to keep the peace with the more quarrelsome board members like Dr. Midgley. Perhaps there is a Midgley-like character in the Cody group who reacted strongly to Dr. Peterson for his proximity to the Church. They perhaps sensed some duplicity on the part of the Church and just assumed Dr. Peterson was part of it.

It is a shame about banning, when Gemli left it took the zest out of SeN. Now it is a duller round of dittos with some right-wing politics added.
I agree. Gemli was the spark of his blog. Look at the dreary amount of comments since he left. I don't think it has ever broached 50. And the content is equally boring. Humble brag mixed with an occasional "spot" on from DCP. Billy Shears still holds their feet to the flame occasionally but all in all it is chloroform in print.
User avatar
Everybody Wang Chung
God
Posts: 2550
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 1:52 am

Re: DCP posting personal information of Cody Temple critics

Post by Everybody Wang Chung »

Rivendale wrote:
Sun Sep 10, 2023 7:50 pm

I agree. Gemli was the spark of his blog. Look at the dreary amount of comments since he left. I don't think it has ever broached 50. And the content is equally boring. Humble brag mixed with an occasional "spot" on from DCP. Billy Shears still holds their feet to the flame occasionally but all in all it is chloroform in print.
Over at the Cody Wyoming Obsession Board, Dorkenpork Peterson has slowly created the most boring blog/echo chamber on Patheos. That’s no small feat and took years of banning hundreds of posters and years of cutting/pasting/plagiarizing articles. There’s not a single article that Dorkenpork hasn’t recycled at least 20 times.

It’s torture, reading the multiple, incoherent posts from the 4 loyal commenters on Sic et Non. Michael Hogan, Jack, John Pack Lambert and the DezNat member, The Last Danite.
"I'm on paid sabbatical from BYU in exchange for my promise to use this time to finish two books."

Daniel C. Peterson, 2014
User avatar
Rivendale
God
Posts: 1431
Joined: Tue Mar 16, 2021 5:21 pm

Re: DCP posting personal information of Cody Temple critics

Post by Rivendale »

Doctor CamNC4Me wrote:
Sat Sep 09, 2023 10:36 pm
Marcus wrote:
Sat Sep 09, 2023 9:27 pm
And not only that, they found and banned his TWO additional sock puppet accounts! Which he started using apparently after his first banning!! The irony is getting ridiculous.
Yet another example of ‘every accusation is a confession’ by these oh so Christlike Mormon priesthood dorks. From SeN’s comments section:
The bells of hell toll loud on that site. Interesting how they'll justify their behaviour at the last day - "I did it all for you, Lord". Hmm...
- Doc
When they left Nauvoo they scrawled on the walls . . . come after us.
Marcus
God
Posts: 6573
Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2021 10:44 pm

Re: DCP posting personal information of Cody Temple critics

Post by Marcus »

I failed to share a photograph of the Gila Valley Arizona Temple while we were in the state, the only one of Arizona’s temples that I omitted. Like the one planned for Cody, Wyoming, it completely blocks everybody’s view of the sky.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... ntext.html
What an ass Peterson is. What a total ass.
User avatar
Doctor Scratch
B.H. Roberts Chair of Mopologetic Studies
Posts: 1474
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 7:24 pm
Location: Cassius University

Re: DCP posting personal information of Cody Temple critics

Post by Doctor Scratch »

In one of his classic FARMS articles, DCP wrote something to the effect of, “We did not start this fight, but we won’t back down from it.” Funny how that has now come back full-circle—in many ways, actually.
"If, while hoping that everybody else will be honest and so forth, I can personally prosper through unethical and immoral acts without being detected and without risk, why should I not?." --Daniel Peterson, 6/4/14
Doctor CamNC4Me
God
Posts: 9710
Joined: Wed Oct 28, 2020 2:04 am

Re: DCP posting personal information of Cody Temple critics

Post by Doctor CamNC4Me »

Is it no longer plagiarism when Dorkenpork publishes something, claims no originality, claims he consulted four unnamed sources, and then proceeds to mirror Wikipedia's history of Egypt?

https://www.patheos.com/blogs/danpeters ... 01705.html

compared to:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_Egypt

Image

edit: grammar
Last edited by Doctor CamNC4Me on Mon Sep 11, 2023 3:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Post Reply