You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)

[Shulem]

Interesting that the final defence for the Book of Abraham is that it's irrelevant doctrinally. Brilliant.

It's not irrelevant doctrinally.

Regards,
MG

MG,

I trust you've seen my thread Question for Don Bradley in which I question him about Mormon doctrine pertaining to the dark skin curse in the Book of Mormon. But Bradley, like you, is a coward and refused to reply. YOU are more than welcome to go into the thread and take over for Bradley and offer your own sorry excuses. Ha ha ha. Will you? I'll chew you up and spit you out! I dare you! I double dare you!!

Just try it!



And so, how is this "doctrine" in chapter one relevant? And how is it a historical description of *how* and *when* Egypt was founded?

Pharaoh, being a righteous man, established his kingdom and judged his people wisely and justly all his days, seeking earnestly to imitate that order established by the fathers in the first generations, in the days of the first patriarchal reign, even in the reign of Adam, and also of Noah, his father, who blessed him with the blessings of the earth, and with the blessings of wisdom, but cursed him as pertaining to the Priesthood.

Now, Pharaoh being of that lineage by which he could not have the right of Priesthood, notwithstanding the Pharaohs would fain claim it from Noah, through Ham, therefore my father was led away by their idolatry;

[MG 2.0]

Substance-free nonsense is your only export.

I think the evidence shows the opposite to be true.

Also, to be clear, the "bomb throwers" end up being an 'elite' few of the critics that inhabit this place.

Just a few.

I've had many productive conversations with a number of folks here.

Marcus just doesn't happen to be one of them.

She is the "bomb thrower". And it hasn't been just at me. In my opinion she is not an asset to the board. Simply a critic and provocateur with nothing to offer.

She could change her ways, however, and that would be a breath of fresh air.

Regards,
MG

[Shulem]

I think Shulem has made many brilliant points that justify the thread's existence.

Objectifying women?

What else would you add? Be specific please.

Regards,
MG

MG is now trolling Moksha.

Should I cut and paste all those "brilliant points" and shove them down your throat, MG? You act as if nothing happened. You are playing tricks.

I see clearly what you are doing as do others.

[Marcus]

Substance-free nonsense is your only export.

...I've had many productive conversations with a number of folks here...

Says the OP, who started off by trashing this place, and telling everyone to get off their keyboards and get out of here.

The legendary troll-rewrites continue.

[MG 2.0]

...I've had many productive conversations with a number of folks here...

Says the OP, who started off by trashing this place, and telling everyone to get off their keyboards and get out of here.

The legendary troll-rewrites continue.

Blah blah blah. And so it continues.

Regards,
MG

[MG 2.0]

Objectifying women?

What else would you add? Be specific please.

Regards,
MG

MG is now trolling Moksha.

Umm...no.

Regards,
MG

[Shulem]

MG is now trolling Moksha.

Umm...no.

Regards,
MG

Umm...yes.

[The Stig]

Substance-free nonsense is your only export.

I think the evidence shows the opposite to be true.

Also, to be clear, the "bomb throwers" end up being an 'elite' few of the critics that inhabit this place.

Just a few.

I've had many productive conversations with a number of folks here.

Marcus just doesn't happen to be one of them.

She is the "bomb thrower". And it hasn't been just at me. In my opinion she is not an asset to the board. Simply a critic and provocateur with nothing to offer.

She could change her ways, however, and that would be a breath of fresh air.

Regards,
MG

I think the evidence shows your capacity for self deception is in a class all its own.

[Rivendale]

Umm...no.

Regards,
MG

Umm...yes.

I find it fascinating how believers make excuses for the Book of Abraham. I think it is the smoking gun of Mormonism and that is probably why you aren't getting any responses. It is indefensible, most people fall back on the motte-and-bailey tactic which is what MG just did when he went with the cornerstone analogy. Jim Bennet did the same thing with the Book of Abraham.

[MG 2.0]

I think the evidence shows the opposite to be true.

Also, to be clear, the "bomb throwers" end up being an 'elite' few of the critics that inhabit this place.

Just a few.

I've had many productive conversations with a number of folks here.

Marcus just doesn't happen to be one of them.

She is the "bomb thrower". And it hasn't been just at me. In my opinion she is not an asset to the board. Simply a critic and provocateur with nothing to offer.

She could change her ways, however, and that would be a breath of fresh air.

Regards,
MG

I think the evidence shows your capacity for self deception is in a class all its own.

Something a critic would say.

Regards,
MG