You guys are still at it! (why am I not surprised?)

[Gadianton]

Critics have also made the accusation that Hitler was wrong.

There will be plenty more to add their voices to those who already have opined.

(therefore, Hitler wasn't wrong)

[Marcus]

How many times over the years has mg concluded that people here are not good people? It's usually one at a time, each time he interacts, but other times it's in the form of sweeping generalizations, such as when he called people here "purveyors of sin and sodomy," or when he argued that all exmormons are more likely to be liars than a Mormon like him.

The quote i posted before is exactly applicable to mg's attachment to this forum:

[Trolling includes the behavior of those] who attach themselves to a given tribe of people with whom they don’t actually want to identify with but whom they do want the personal privilege of constantly critiquing with their posts.

https://www.christopherbenek.com/2015/0 ... -trolling/

[Shulem]

Truth is truth, wherever it is found. The Book of Abraham contains some priceless truths.

Sweet!

MG'S statement is a confession. Allow me to explain: first, we all agree that "truth is truth, wherever it is found", which includes the now and that which is past (history). We will agree with Joseph Smith's adage, "Truth is knowledge of things as they are, and as they were." (D&C 93:24)

Then MG confesses that not all things in the Book of Abraham can be classified as priceless truths. But what are "priceless truths" other than terminology used by religions to proclaim what they think is true. It's a kind of double talk because there is no price on something that is true, it just is, or it's simply true. So, MG is leading us on to suppose that other truths found in the Book of Abraham may not be as important and therefore shouldn't be valued in the same sense as that which is priceless. But all truths are true and price has no bearing. Some truths uplift and are helpful, while some are not. But "all truth may be circumscribed into one great whole."

The kicker is when MG states "some truths" because this alludes to the idea that not all of the Book of Abraham *is* true! He seems to admit the book contains things that are not necessarily priceless or therefore true. I'm confident that what MG refers to as priceless truths are the theology and religious beliefs that cannot be proven scientifically. MG is very aware of my Book of Abraham threads that highlight the many historical untruths. Take chapter one for example, there are several things therein that are historically untrue and are therefore worthless. Same goes for the Facsimiles and there is nothing about the Explanations of Facsimile No. 3 that are priceless, let alone true!

Thank you for your confession, MG.

[I Have Questions]

No, what you said was that Gee agreed with with you. That’s a grandiose phraseology. It specifically implies that Gee read something you wrote or said and then subsequently agreed with it. It’s obvious narcissistic phraseology.

B.S.

You may want to look at one or more of these descriptors and honestly question whether your head is screwed on straight.

That’s the reaction of a narcissist. A normal person would have accepted they phrased it grandiosely. A narcissist needs to seek to justify it and position themselves as not being wrong. Which is exactly what you’ve done. It’s what you always do. To be fair, you can’t help yourself. It’s just the personality disorder that you have. It’s not really your fault.

Please can you refrain from using swear words? There are ladies on this thread who don’t need to witness your use of industrial language.

[I Have Questions]

Yes it is. There’s no meaningful doctrine in it that cannot be found elsewhere.

Truth is truth, wherever it is found. The Book of Abraham contains some priceless truths.

Regards,
MG

And yet you haven’t provided a single example. As The Stig has pointed out, your posts lack anything resembling substance, it’s just platitude after platitude after platitude. You’re the epitome of a lazy learner.

[Shulem]

B.S.

Please can you refrain from using swear words? There are ladies on this thread who don’t need to witness your use of industrial language.

Butt there are ladies in the room that MG might love to swear to.

Something new to shout about, huh?

And it's not easy. We are human beings prone to sin.

[Shulem]

If you folks were to be paid for your work here it would be a fairly healthy second income.

MG,

Would you like six Nephite onti coins for telling us "whose name is given in the characters above his head" in Facsimile No. 3, Fig. 2? And Fig. 4. "Prince of Pharaoh, King of Egypt, as written above the hand." What's his name?

***Feel free to ask John Gee for help***


I met her in a club down in old Soho

She walked up to me and she asked me to dance

Well, I'm not the world's most physical guy

Well, I'm not dumb but I can't understand

Well, we drank champagne and danced all night

Well, I'm not the world's most passionate guy

Girls will be boys and boys will be girls

Well, I'm not the world's most masculine man

Lola
La-la-la-la Lola
La-la-la-la Lola


Dance with me baby...




PS. MG, I was wondering if you're bisexual? Please tell us a little more about yourself.

[Shulem]

And then you continue to desecrate the Christ.

Your Church continues to desecrates Anubis. And you point your finger at me? Thou hypocrite.

Take that!

[Shulem]

Hoping for the smoking gun that will take down the church.

What do you mean about a smoking gun that takes down the Church? Please be specific.

What *is* that smoking gun you think I'm referring to?

[Shulem]

How many times over the years has mg concluded that people here are not good people? It's usually one at a time, each time he interacts, but other times it's in the form of sweeping generalizations, such as when he called people here "purveyors of sin and sodomy," or when he argued that all exmormons are more likely to be liars than a Mormon like him.

I find MG to be a cake walk. He's lame. It's easy peasy lemon squeezy making juice out him.