$$$$

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
_ajax18
_Emeritus
Posts: 6914
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:56 am

Post by _ajax18 »

but it seems unreasonable to expect them to accept a Church calling that requires them to sell the family home and yank the kids out of college.


I'm just saying that I don't think clergy positions should be among the highest paying jobs in town? Do you think they should? Don't GAs kids go to BYU free? I know that's just undergrad., but it's just a side note.
And when the confederates saw Jackson standing fearless as a stone wall the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

ajax18 wrote:
but it seems unreasonable to expect them to accept a Church calling that requires them to sell the family home and yank the kids out of college.


I'm just saying that I don't think clergy positions should be among the highest paying jobs in town? Do you think they should? Don't GAs kids go to BYU free? I know that's just undergrad., but it's just a side note.


They belly up at the church's trough year after year, living in warm homes with food on the table and clothes on their backs paid for by the widow and the poor, who go without food and shelter to pay their 10%... and then the GA's kids get a college education for free? Does anyone but me see anything wrong with that picture?
_Benjamin McGuire
_Emeritus
Posts: 508
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 6:42 pm

Post by _Benjamin McGuire »

Harmony writes:
They belly up at the church's trough year after year, living in warm homes with food on the table and clothes on their backs paid for by the widow and the poor, who go without food and shelter to pay their 10%... and then the GA's kids get a college education for free? Does anyone but me see anything wrong with that picture?
Sure. It is tinged with your bitterness. How many of the "widows and the poor" receive assistance from the church? Do you think that the church wants to make people go without food or shelter? Are the majority of tithe payers the poor and the widows? Does most of the tithing funds of the church come from these impoverished individuals and widows?

This is for the most part creative license, and it doesn't describe the vast majority of us middle-class members, who pay our tithing willingly (and who make up the bulk of tithepayers), and don't have the issues that you have. So, if you find some of us unsympathetic, perhaps its because your over-the-top rhetoric does far more disservice to your cause than might imagine. Here, of course, where there are so many critical of the LDS church, you may well find sympathy. But, it doesn't make it a good argument.

On the other hand, I grew up in a very poor family (perhaps impoverished is a better word). I had twelve siblings. My parents converted to Mormonism. We payed our tithing, and always had sufficient funds to make do. On the backs of tithepayers (my parents included), seven of those thirteen kids managed to get a good education at BYU at a fraction of the cost it would have taken anywhere else (three went elsewhere, one is in the military, one has never gotten an education past high school, and the youngest is still in high school). Church tithing funds that may pay for the education of GA children have also given my entire family an opportunity to change the conditions of our existence.

In the decade I spent as a ward finance clerk and later as a district clerk assigned to help high councilmen perform their annual financial audits, I had access to the fiscal records of dozens of church units. I saw how much money came in, I saw what the money was spent on, and I saw how the needy were cared for. To take this tack really represents to me a degree of pettiness - and my perspective is as one who has been in the situation where paying the tithing was at time very burdensome.

Ben
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by _Jason Bourne »

harmony wrote:
ajax18 wrote:
but it seems unreasonable to expect them to accept a Church calling that requires them to sell the family home and yank the kids out of college.


I'm just saying that I don't think clergy positions should be among the highest paying jobs in town? Do you think they should? Don't GAs kids go to BYU free? I know that's just undergrad., but it's just a side note.


They belly up at the church's trough year after year, living in warm homes with food on the table and clothes on their backs paid for by the widow and the poor, who go without food and shelter to pay their 10%... and then the GA's kids get a college education for free? Does anyone but me see anything wrong with that picture?


Well the two are not mutually exclusive. The Church does help the poor, etc. Maybe not enough for some, but they do help and are charitable.

As for GAs pay, I think they should be paid and it ought to be close to what similar pay is in the corporate world for similar jobs, perhaps discounted a bit because it is a church. And I have no problem that they get paid out of tithes, if they do. But I think we ought to have a paid ministry as well.

But the problem is because the books are not open it creates all sorts of suspicions and unaccountability. I am for open books.
_ajax18
_Emeritus
Posts: 6914
Joined: Wed Oct 25, 2006 2:56 am

Post by _ajax18 »

How much would a bishop get paid for his services Jason? Would you make it a full time job?

I remember my Dad telling the story of how as a kid the one thing he was able to take from growing up Presbyterian was that under no circumstances would he ever want to be a Presbyterian preacher. Later he converted to Mormonism and was called as branch president. After about three years of that he remembered back to his childhood and noticed a big frown across his face as he was putting his tie on.

Seriously though, that was one of the hardest things about being a missionary for me. It was 24/7 religion. I don't think anyone should be subjected to that. You need to have human experiences as well as spiritual ones.

Then of course the next question for me would be, what would be the payscale. I mean, bishops and SPs work pretty hard. Should they get paid less than GAs just because GAs are higher up on the totem pole? I believe in capitalism but I think it has its problems. When how much money you make isn't about how much you're producing but rather about who you are, I think it's no better than the old feudal system of gluttonous kings and nobles. I also believe our modern system isn't as different from feudalism as we'd like to think.

I know business men who can construe things to make it look like they made 5 million more than other guy who did his jobs because he made this or that decision. Yet I have a hard time believing that any man is worth more than $300,000k/year. I just don't see how he's actually producing that much alone. I think a lot of peopple are helping him do that often times and he's just in the position to get all the credit and ultimately the lions share of the cash. How much does a general pracitioner doctor make or even a teacher? How much time, sacrifice and effort do they have to put in just to be worthy to do the job? How many hours does a teacher spend to do a descent job?

How much does a corporate manager get paid? How did he get into that position? It wasn't through investing time and money to educate himself. It was connections of course. It's ironic that these same corporate managers who won't pay sufficient wages or benefits expect other people in the community to pick up the slack for free. They expect the doctors to treat their employees for free, otherwise the bosses may catch the same diseases their lower class workers get when they have to interact with them. They expect the government to educate them, but they don't want to pay sufficient taxes to allow them to do that.

Yes I have a problem with corporate America, and it's distasteful to get a second dose of that on Sunday after enduring it from these arrogant jackasses during the week. I'd like to see an SP knock a door or two or maybe even pick up a chainsaw in a Katrina service project. It's like they think this is beneath them. I admit that not all of them are this way, but it's dissapointing to see this type of attitude at all. The fact that they think they deserve to be paid more than everyone else only creates further mistrust about their true motives. If a local branch president is doing just as much work as Head GA president of everything, why shouldn't he be getting paid as much?
And when the confederates saw Jackson standing fearless as a stone wall the army of Northern Virginia took courage and drove the federal army off their land.
_harmony
_Emeritus
Posts: 18195
Joined: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:35 am

Post by _harmony »

Benjamin McGuire wrote:Harmony writes:
They belly up at the church's trough year after year, living in warm homes with food on the table and clothes on their backs paid for by the widow and the poor, who go without food and shelter to pay their 10%... and then the GA's kids get a college education for free? Does anyone but me see anything wrong with that picture?
Sure. It is tinged with your bitterness. How many of the "widows and the poor" receive assistance from the church? Do you think that the church wants to make people go without food or shelter? Are the majority of tithe payers the poor and the widows? Does most of the tithing funds of the church come from these impoverished individuals and widows?

This is for the most part creative license, and it doesn't describe the vast majority of us middle-class members, who pay our tithing willingly (and who make up the bulk of tithepayers), and don't have the issues that you have. So, if you find some of us unsympathetic, perhaps its because your over-the-top rhetoric does far more disservice to your cause than might imagine. Here, of course, where there are so many critical of the LDS church, you may well find sympathy. But, it doesn't make it a good argument.


My over-the-top rhetoric (which I tend to agree with you about... it does occasionally get out of hand, especially with this subject) does not negate the fact that GA's (who make $600,000 a year, according to another thread) children attend college free, while that widow's child or that poor child has to pay (or get a scholarship, if they're smart or needy enough). Deal with the message, Don't kill the messenger, just because you don't like the message or the tone with which it is delivered.

On the other hand, I grew up in a very poor family (perhaps impoverished is a better word). I had twelve siblings. My parents converted to Mormonism. We payed our tithing, and always had sufficient funds to make do. On the backs of tithepayers (my parents included), seven of those thirteen kids managed to get a good education at BYU at a fraction of the cost it would have taken anywhere else (three went elsewhere, one is in the military, one has never gotten an education past high school, and the youngest is still in high school). Church tithing funds that may pay for the education of GA children have also given my entire family an opportunity to change the conditions of our existence.


Meanwhile, while your parents are scrimping and barely getting by, your average GA is taking home $600,000 a year, with an unaudited unlimited credit card, unlimited travel allowance, and... and their children go to school free. (And no, BYU is not a 'fraction of the cost' of similiar education. BYU costs about the same as many colleges that are just as good, and some better. That's a myth.)

I don't know about your circumstances now, but since I raised a family of 8 children under very trying circumstances, scrimping every penny, picking up produce in the fields after the harvesters went through because the farmer was kind enough to try to help me feed my family in the winters, making do or doing without, putting my kids in hand-me-down clothes, putting the baby's crib in the bathroom because there simply was no other space for it... I speak to the frustration of hearing about this kind of financial malfeasance. Don't try to patronize me, Ben. I lived it; I've been there, done that, and yes... I earned that teeshirt that says "8 kids, all college educated, none at BYU, all upstanding citizens, no thanks to the LDS church". The leaders lie every day, every minute of their lives. They tell the members and the world that they don't get paid... "without purse or script"... look how they sacrifice to lead our church. Horse manure, Ben. If this wasn't the Celestial Forum, I'd call it exactly what it is. They lie, and they cover up their lies by keeping the books closed.

In the decade I spent as a ward finance clerk and later as a district clerk assigned to help high councilmen perform their annual financial audits, I had access to the fiscal records of dozens of church units. I saw how much money came in, I saw what the money was spent on, and I saw how the needy were cared for. To take this tack really represents to me a degree of pettiness - and my perspective is as one who has been in the situation where paying the tithing was at time very burdensome.

Ben


And I don't doubt you at all. But you didn't audit the GA's, did you, Ben?

Let's talk about what they get:

$600,000 a year
unlimited credit cards
unlimited travel
rent-free housing in church-owned housing
all expenses paid
maid service
limousine service

That's the personal stuff.

Then there's the corporate stuff:

$6 billion on a shopping mall
$1.1 billion on a conference center that has leaks and structural problems
shoddy construction, poor quality materials, cost overruns, 7 day cures on concrete.
the whole Main Street Plaza mess
SLC's reputation for bribery and corruption during the Olympics

It just goes on and on... and why? Because the financials aren't transparent. There is no accountability. This is an example of unrighteous dominion and poor stewardship to the max.
_Mercury
_Emeritus
Posts: 5545
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:14 pm

Post by _Mercury »

Benjamin McGuire wrote:Harmony writes:
They belly up at the church's trough year after year, living in warm homes with food on the table and clothes on their backs paid for by the widow and the poor, who go without food and shelter to pay their 10%... and then the GA's kids get a college education for free? Does anyone but me see anything wrong with that picture?
Sure. It is tinged with your bitterness. How many of the "widows and the poor" receive assistance from the church? Do you think that the church wants to make people go without food or shelter? Are the majority of tithe payers the poor and the widows? Does most of the tithing funds of the church come from these impoverished individuals and widows?

This is for the most part creative license, and it doesn't describe the vast majority of us middle-class members, who pay our tithing willingly (and who make up the bulk of tithepayers), and don't have the issues that you have. So, if you find some of us unsympathetic, perhaps its because your over-the-top rhetoric does far more disservice to your cause than might imagine. Here, of course, where there are so many critical of the LDS church, you may well find sympathy. But, it doesn't make it a good argument.

On the other hand, I grew up in a very poor family (perhaps impoverished is a better word). I had twelve siblings. My parents converted to Mormonism. We payed our tithing, and always had sufficient funds to make do. On the backs of tithepayers (my parents included), seven of those thirteen kids managed to get a good education at BYU at a fraction of the cost it would have taken anywhere else (three went elsewhere, one is in the military, one has never gotten an education past high school, and the youngest is still in high school). Church tithing funds that may pay for the education of GA children have also given my entire family an opportunity to change the conditions of our existence.

In the decade I spent as a ward finance clerk and later as a district clerk assigned to help high councilmen perform their annual financial audits, I had access to the fiscal records of dozens of church units. I saw how much money came in, I saw what the money was spent on, and I saw how the needy were cared for. To take this tack really represents to me a degree of pettiness - and my perspective is as one who has been in the situation where paying the tithing was at time very burdensome.

Ben


I would like to know how many of those on the church dole are themselves required to have paid their tithing in order to recieve a microloan from the "church".

The church is sold as a very bad system of welfare. Even tithing is sold this way.

The Mormons preparation their audience before the telemarketing spectacle that is General conference. They are also given an informal credit check, a.k.a. tithing. if it is neccesary for someone to borrow money from church welfare it is essential to preparation the mark before by making sure several things are in place:

--Before usury occurs, the Mark must have been taught the principal of tithing

--Tithing is defined as ten percent of the Marks salary and projected salary.

--In the church's SLC mainframe tithing records, activity records, timing of certain callings and other misc. information is stored, along with other factors such as the total interest earned on certain church "investments". This is a representation of the "ZeitMark", or a.k.a. "collective stupidity".

--THis number is refined through verying means. It is exemplified in the need for the emphasis on continued, stable rates of growth.

--They shape their congregations into investment groups and social structures, a.k.a. wards.

These telemarketers set up information distribution systems. A very easy task any fortune 1000 could do. They also tell you about the benefits of participation through social systems of order. These systems are preparation for the big sell every six months.

Usury on the poor and weak is one example of despicable activity. The poor and the weak are contributing to an emotionally tied investment. This is then so covered up by the gushing of promotional backstory so sacharine its disgusting to all but the bitter.
And crawling on the planet's face
Some insects called the human race
Lost in time
And lost in space...and meaning
_Dr. Shades
_Emeritus
Posts: 14117
Joined: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:07 pm

Post by _Dr. Shades »

[MODERATOR POST: This thread has been moved since it has, over time, developed a more "Terrestrial" feel to it than a Celestial one.

This inter-kingdom movement is not a punishment; it is merely an administrative reclassification.

Now back to your regularly-scheduled programming.]
"Finally, for your rather strange idea that miracles are somehow linked to the amount of gay sexual gratification that is taking place would require that primitive Christianity was launched by gay sex, would it not?"

--Louis Midgley
Post Reply