Nightingale wrote:I have seen many calls for MADites/apologists to come on over and enter into discussions on this board. DCP finally shows up (about the time that hell freezes) and he gets this:
"Are you a liar? Was Nibley a liar? I believe so. When one takes excruciating measures to create revisionist history, betray others confidence and go out of ones way to defend the indefensible you then become a liar.
Maybe that's why no one in your field actually knows your name.
Tell me douchebag, do you believe that tapirs can be used as horses?"
The front page of this board says:
"Here is a place of free discussion. Whether you want to discuss the finer intricacies of doctrine, or whether you want to discuss the truthiness of the church in general, your word will be heard here.
Pro, anti, investigator, questioner, critic, apologetic, no matter what you call yourself, what you have to say, or what your agenda is, you have a place here. We pride ourselves on a minimalistic moderation policy, so that your voice is always heard."
If the majority really do want substantive discussion they could be sadly disappointed if "free discussion" equates to gross discourtesy. Board management says "you have a place here" [even if you're DCP] and yet you'd have to really really want to be here to wade on through when it's such hard slogging, as above.
One of the biggest obstacles to smooth running of these boards is that it's difficult to have a cohesive unit when there's no one playbook. Some people would be very interested in discussions on topics of mutual interest with knowledgeable people, whoever they are. Others don't even want to talk about Mormonism. The forum selection answers that to some extent but obviously not altogether.
I didn't consider that my reception on FAIR/MAD as a newbie poster was all that friendly. They can certainly say the same about this board. I know some people won't care about that but I thought the majority agenda was to attract new and diverse participants? I'm not saying to pull our punches in a fair debate but the knee jerk pot shots are unseemly even on a day when hell/ice happens (DCP shows up on MD). I thought that was what you wanted? Who could blame him for never coming back?
I know if this was MAD somebody would be yelling "board nanny" at me. I'm not trying to be that - it's just that I'm seeing a huge discrepancy between the stated goals and the posting reality. It's no way to grow a board. :/
My two cents. I like this board, because I can speak my mind. I do not always like what I see, and I know that I haven't always been the best of contributors. But I do like the fact that here we can actually speak about reality without Julia** breathing down our backs.
Why is it that certain people have to have the red carpet rolled out, simply because they cannot separate their sense of self from their religion? Why should the words of ex-mos, liberal mos, nevermos, etc., be hampered because of these individuals? They choose to post here, if they don't like it, the internet is as free as the country most of us live in. Go elsewhere, go where they will tailor the information to your sensibilities.
There are certain folks, who if they post here, due to the treatment they've given others, are automatically going to get hammered. Juliann would never get a civil word from me, and I'm not usually an unforgiving person. Someone on this thread stated that DCP gets a lot less abuse than his behavior deserves. The man mentioned my name once, and I had never interacted with the individual prior to that, I just didn't fit into his mold of what he thought I should be.
This board is a colorful mosaic, and that is what makes it both successful, and entertaining. People feel free here. Why take that away for a small group of people who feel that they are the standard that life should go by?