truth dancer wrote:Hi Hoops..If your comment is solely on the popular culture's objectification of women,
Yes this was the intent of my comment.I am fully on board, ticket paid for, and excited for the trip. However, to tie men's natural reaction to this manifestation is unacceptable to me. We have had these thoughts of women long before there were "Vogue" or "insert insipid women's magazine title here" (I'm teasing)
I have never said anything about the natural inclination of men to enjoy a woman's body.I thought you were blaming men for this phenomenon.
Nope... woman have bought into the idea. (I do think the origin has to do with the beginning of patriarchy thousands of years ago but this is another topic)! :-)And the crux of your argument was the FACT that men admire women's form.
Nope... I'm talking about a society that sends a message to girls and women that their value lies in how sexually attractive they are to men.I saw a girl just yesterday. Could have been anywhere from 15 to 25, I don't know. I don't remember what she looks like now, but at the time I thought she was very beautiful. So where does that place me on the scale of evil?
I'm not sure what gave you the impression that there is something wrong here... it is religion that has issues with evil not me.
Men and women notice the unusual... attractive, UNattractive, tall, short, fat, skinny. We notice what is more unusual in life.
I do not understand the idea that there is evil in this.
What IS primitive (in my opinion), is the idea that a woman's worth is equal to her attractiveness. Again, I am NOT saying this is YOUR opinion. I'm saying that this is the message inundating our society.
~dancer~
Then I owe you an apology for my snottiness. I agree with you. I think our little altercation was flummoxed by my contention that a women's sexual attractiveness does have value, yet I did not make clear that it's value should be with confines agreed upon by that particular woman. i.e. my husband should think I'm hot!!
Thanks for your patience with me.