“Peter Pan” is Unmasked as Mike Parker

[Marcus]

I'm guessing they realized cutting it looked worse than leaving it in.

Sorry, Marcus. I misread your question. It wasn’t back when I watched a couple hours ago.

No prob, i'm just glad drumdude grabbed it. Quick thinking.

[drumdude]

It’s guaranteed that any time a Mormon apologist opens their mouth they’re going to lie or hide in some way.

I’m not even surprised anymore.

[Res Ipsa]

Sorry, Marcus. I misread your question. It wasn’t back when I watched a couple hours ago.

No prob, i'm just glad drumdude grabbed it. Quick thinking.

Yep. Kudos drumdude.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

Drumdude is knocking it out of the park.

[drumdude]

I’m going to be the first anti-Mormon to make it to the S tier of Boylan’s tier list:

https://youtu.be/df7KteFr9E0

[Marcus]

From the transcript, how Boylan came up with the first name of his fictional black LDS apologist and why he's male:

...and it was like this really uh this there was this a girl from the south of the US called Rochelle
1:13:09
it's like that's a very random name but I taught like instead look inside Rochelle maybe go with Richard or some
1:13:16
other male name because I think there's a rule on the internet if you don't know the gender of someone you're interacting
1:13:22
with nine times out of ten it's male I think there's something about law uh of the internet there so but I'm also
1:13:29
talking about Latter-Day Saint apologists here of which yeah 99.875 or male so you know yeah...

[Marcus]

So, as far as I can tell the final upload does NOT include the Kraus detail where Parker explains how the Interpreter twice published the 'inside' joke, in which Kraus thanked both Mike Parker, and 'peter pan,' for assistance and support with reviews of Neville material? This is found in drumdude's preserved clip, from the original upload. why was it removed?

[drumdude]

So, as far as I can tell the final upload does NOT include the Kraus detail where Parker explains how the Interpreter twice published the 'inside' joke, in which Kraus thanked both Mike Parker, and 'peter pan,' for assistance and support with reviews of Neville material? This is found in drumdude's preserved clip, from the original upload. why was it removed?

Yep he cut it out about 50 minutes after posting it. Who knows. Perhaps DCP sent them a frantic text asking them politely not to drag Interpreter into it.

[Everybody Wang Chung]

So, as far as I can tell the final upload does NOT include the Kraus detail where Parker explains how the Interpreter twice published the 'inside' joke, in which Kraus thanked both Mike Parker, and 'peter pan,' for assistance and support with reviews of Neville material? This is found in drumdude's preserved clip, from the original upload. why was it removed?

Yep he cut it out about 50 minutes after posting it. Who knows. Perhaps DCP sent them a frantic text asking them politely not to drag Interpreter into it.

Can someone tell Mike Parker to stay off the internet for a couple of weeks? He's not doing well.

[Doctor CamNC4Me]

From NNL:

I trust, however, that honest people of good will—among whom I count many of my readers—will be interested in hearing how this blog began and why it exists in the first place.

As I mentioned in this interview, I tried to be accurate and fair when I described the beliefs and arguments of Jonathan Neville and others in the Heartland movement. If anything I said was inaccurate, please leave a comment below and offer a correction.

—Mike Parker [“Peter Pan”]

Honest? Good will? You’re a joke, Peter Pan. And Boylan cutting out pertinent information from your “interview” with him is pathetic and cowardly.

damned Mormons … just apologize already for your bad behavior.

- Doc