The Depressing Plan of Salvation

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_huckelberry
_Emeritus
Posts: 4559
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 2:29 am

Post by _huckelberry »

I think one of the strongest teachings about salvation from LDS speakers is that we cannot be saved in isolation. It is a group possiblity. Now that idea is strong in Catholicism and is not entirely dead with Protestants. But for each group I wonder how well the help extends beyond boundaries of the chosen few whatever they may be. I think the best hope in Christianity is that the links of help toward salvation do not know boundaries.

I believe Gods concern and love is real and healing extends beyond the limits we fear.
_truth dancer
_Emeritus
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Post by _truth dancer »

Hi Harmony...
Give me wings and call me an angel, I'm not interested in being a goddess. Or send me to a lesser kingdom, I'm not interested in being an eternal mother, hidden from her children. I have no interest in teaching anyone in spirit prison, nor do I expect to sit around all day, singing praises to God. Sounds pretty danged boring to me.


This is exactly why the LDS version of heaven (CKHL) never worked for me.

First, a mother has to send 1/3 of her children to outer darkenss? I mean this alone is enough to NEVER, EVER want to be a Goddess... then the idea of a Queen just never appealed to me (after about the age of 10). I just truly don't want to be a Goddess, Priestess, polygamous wife populating offspring for eternity.

That is why, even if the church is true, I am ok with not being one of the chosen. ;-)

~dancer~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
_Hoops
_Emeritus
Posts: 2863
Joined: Sun Jul 29, 2007 5:11 am

Post by _Hoops »

Truth Dancer:

I find this ineresting and I am NOT picking a fight here. Just curious. Even if the LDS position is true - which most thinking people know is not - despite that you would rather not be a adherent based on your feelings? Isn't this what many find is the primary difficulty with Mormonism to begin with?

Just curious.
_Doctor Steuss
_Emeritus
Posts: 4597
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:57 pm

Post by _Doctor Steuss »

truth dancer wrote:[...]

First, a mother has to send 1/3 of her children to outer darkenss? [...]

~dancer~


Clarification. It was a "third part," not 1/3. I'm still trying to figure out what the "first part" and "second part" are though. *shrugs*

Also, I don't know how the LDS idea of a "third part" to Outer Darkness is any different than G-d arbitrarily sending the majority of His kids to burn in "hell" for simply not "believing" in His son.
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." ~Charles Bukowski
_beastie
_Emeritus
Posts: 14216
Joined: Thu Nov 02, 2006 2:26 am

Post by _beastie »

I find this ineresting and I am NOT picking a fight here. Just curious. Even if the LDS position is true - which most thinking people know is not - despite that you would rather not be a adherent based on your feelings? Isn't this what many find is the primary difficulty with Mormonism to begin with?


You would have a point if TD were saying that her negative feelings about the plan of salvation was some sort of viable "proof" of its falseness. That does not appear to be what she is doing, and in fact stated that IF it were true, she would rather be in a lower kingdom.

The critics' argument against "feelings" as used in the LDS paradigm, is often misrepresented by believers. Critics that I know of never argue that feelings have no purpose in life, but rather that feelings cannot represent some viable proof of some external reality, such as whether or not the Book of Mormon is an ancient historical document.
We hate to seem like we don’t trust every nut with a story, but there’s evidence we can point to, and dance while shouting taunting phrases.

Penn & Teller

http://www.mormonmesoamerica.com
_Trinity
_Emeritus
Posts: 426
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 12:36 pm

Post by _Trinity »

Doctor Steuss wrote:Also, I don't know how the LDS idea of a "third part" to Outer Darkness is any different than G-d arbitrarily sending the majority of His kids to burn in "hell" for simply not "believing" in His son.


It's actually an upgrade from traditional heaven/hell born-again theology. Neither is acceptable or befitting a benevolent being, in my opinion, but it is still an upgrade.
_truth dancer
_Emeritus
Posts: 4792
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:40 pm

Post by _truth dancer »

Clarification. It was a "third part," not 1/3. I'm still trying to figure out what the "first part" and "second part" are though. *shrugs*

Also, I don't know how the LDS idea of a "third part" to Outer Darkness is any different than G-d arbitrarily sending the majority of His kids to burn in "hell" for simply not "believing" in His son.


So, what exactly is a third part?

I'm thinking a third part of a pie is, well a third of the pie.

A third part of mile walk, is about a third of the way.

A third part of homework assignment is about a third.

Please enlighten me! :-)

I agree with Trinity... the third part going to outer darkness and a handful of folks in the CKHL is not a whole lot better than the mainstream Christian belief of heaven and hell...

:-)

~dancer~
"The search for reality is the most dangerous of all undertakings for it destroys the world in which you live." Nisargadatta Maharaj
_Doctor Steuss
_Emeritus
Posts: 4597
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:57 pm

Post by _Doctor Steuss »

truth dancer wrote:
Clarification. It was a "third part," not 1/3. I'm still trying to figure out what the "first part" and "second part" are though. *shrugs*

Also, I don't know how the LDS idea of a "third part" to Outer Darkness is any different than G-d arbitrarily sending the majority of His kids to burn in "hell" for simply not "believing" in His son.


So, what exactly is a third part?

I'm thinking a third part of a pie is, well a third of the pie.

A third part of mile walk, is about a third of the way.

A third part of homework assignment is about a third.

Please enlighten me! :-)

If I walk a mile in three parts, the first part could be .7 miles, the second part .25 miles and the third part .05 miles

Or, if I have 1,000,000 children. The first part could be 950,000, the second part 45,300, and the third part 4,700.

This is where it gets confusing though as we're never told what distinguishes the other two parts other than they weren't kicked out.

Edited to add: Structurecop once told me that the ABD had some interesting articles regarding dividing the angels into three categories (principalities, powers, and kingdoms).

I agree with Trinity... the third part going to outer darkness and a handful of folks in the CKHL is not a whole lot better than the mainstream Christian belief of heaven and hell...

:-)

~dancer~


Do you agree that it is an "upgrade" though?
Last edited by Reflexzero on Wed Aug 01, 2007 9:24 pm, edited 2 times in total.
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." ~Charles Bukowski
_The Nehor
_Emeritus
Posts: 11832
Joined: Mon Apr 30, 2007 2:05 am

Post by _The Nehor »

Seven wrote: I have never met a Christian who believed they would not be with their loved ones in heaven. Eternal marriage is where Mormonism differs. The statement that other faiths believe they will not be with those they know and love is a popular misconception in the LDS church about other Chirstians.


Read C.S. Lewis
"Surely he knows that DCP, The Nehor, Lamanite, and other key apologists..." -Scratch clarifying my status in apologetics
"I admit it; I'm a petty, petty man." -Some Schmo
_Who Knows
_Emeritus
Posts: 2455
Joined: Wed Nov 01, 2006 6:09 pm

Post by _Who Knows »

Doctor Steuss wrote:It was a "third part," not 1/3.


Huh. I've never heard it described like that before. Even LDS.org has a ton of stuff saying it was 'one third'.
WK: "Joseph Smith asserted that the Book of Mormon peoples were the original inhabitants of the americas"
Will Schryver: "No, he didn’t." 3/19/08
Still waiting for Will to back this up...
Post Reply