Top 100 Reasons why GBH is smiling...

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Polygamy Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 2204
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:04 am

Post by _Polygamy Porter »

Jason Bourne wrote:

Tell us Dan, why are you here? To defend your name? Against what?

Pathetic.


Yes PP you are pathetic.

See what I mean people!!!
Oh look, the embarrassed scared hypocrite is back.

Waiting for the mo'buffet to open so you can pick and choose the doctrines you follow?

Too scared to stand up for what he thinks is wrong, yet to embarrassed to embrace the entire doctrine.
_Jason Bourne
_Emeritus
Posts: 9207
Joined: Sun Oct 29, 2006 8:00 pm

Post by _Jason Bourne »

Oh look, the embarrassed scared hypocrite is back.



Yup, that is me, just not embarrassed.


Waiting for the mo'buffet to open so you can pick and choose the doctrines you follow?



Rigidity reulted in what you are. I prefer my approach much more.

Too scared to stand up for what he thinks is wrong, yet to embarrassed to embrace the entire doctrine


Another demonstration that you are so full of it your eyes are brown. PPP-Pathetic Polygamy Porter.
_Daniel Peterson
_Emeritus
Posts: 7173
Joined: Thu Jul 05, 2007 6:56 pm

Post by _Daniel Peterson »

Altogether denounce Kant, Kuhn, and all their works, or else confess that I completely reject the possibility of knowledge?

Weird.

And this, I suspect, is pretty much what that debate with McCue would have been like, too.
_Polygamy Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 2204
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:04 am

Post by _Polygamy Porter »

Daniel Peterson wrote:Altogether denounce Kant, Kuhn, and all their works, or else confess that I completely reject the possibility of knowledge?

Weird.

And this, I suspect, is pretty much what that debate with McCue would have been like, too.
I still do not understand why you are here.
_Ray A

Post by _Ray A »

Polygamy Porter wrote:I still do not understand why you are here.


I'll hazzard some guesses:

For one, the board is called "Mormon Diccussions", and he's a Mormon.

For two, he has said he has come to address specific issues and comments.

For three, he has been accused of being a "coward" for not posting here, has been challenged to post here many times by many people, and when he does post here it appears that some still feel uncomfortable with his presence. Like you, perhaps?
_Polygamy Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 2204
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:04 am

Post by _Polygamy Porter »

Ray A wrote:
Polygamy Porter wrote:I still do not understand why you are here.


I'll hazzard some guesses:

For one, the board is called "Mormon Diccussions", and he's a Mormon.

For two, he has said he has come to address specific issues and comments.

For three, he has been accused of being a "coward" for not posting here, has been challenged to post here many times by many people, and when he does post here it appears that some still feel uncomfortable with his presence. Like you, perhaps?
Fine.

I am just puzzled by his previous statement about the content of this board.

Additionally he puts down the RfM board at ever chance he gets, yet admits to lurking there like a horny teen aged boy outside of an open girls locker room door.
_Tarski
_Emeritus
Posts: 3059
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:57 pm

Post by _Tarski »

Polygamy Porter wrote:Fine.

I am just puzzled by his previous statement about the content of this board.

Additionally he puts down the RfM board at ever chance he gets, yet admits to lurking there like a horny teen aged boy outside of an open girls locker room door.


LOL

You just reminded me that I once walked into the women's locker room at a gym and was already mostly undressed in the midst of a few horrified and incredulous women before I realized my mistake. I darted out without even being able to enjoy the scenery.
_Polygamy Porter
_Emeritus
Posts: 2204
Joined: Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:04 am

Post by _Polygamy Porter »

Tarski wrote:LOL

You just reminded me that I once walked into the women's locker room at a gym and was already mostly undressed in the midst of a few horrified and incredulous women before I realized my mistake. I darted out without even being able to enjoy the scenery.

Hopefully not right after you had gone swimming!

http://www.bobrivers.com/asx/49-1013_3.asx
_Tarski
_Emeritus
Posts: 3059
Joined: Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:57 pm

Post by _Tarski »

Polygamy Porter wrote:Hopefully not right after you had gone swimming!

http://www.bobrivers.com/asx/49-1013_3.asx


No but I didn't get that far in my oblivious inadvertant strip tease anyway.
They wouldn't have been disappointed though I assure you:
Image
_why me
_Emeritus
Posts: 9589
Joined: Fri Feb 02, 2007 8:19 pm

Post by _why me »

Polygamy Porter wrote:
why me wrote: The church is not a slacker church and one needs to be committed to the callings and know that the LDS church is true. If not, the person may not be able to devote the time necessary.
OH
MY
GAWD...

Speaking of SLACKERS! Admitted SLACKERS!!

This coming from an admitted inactive hypocrite. Not recently inactive, but for 30 years. This coming from a person who admits s/he is not committed to either 100% attendance or accepting callings.

You are pathetic. Please change your screen name to defending hypocrite.

Of course I was speaking from personal experience. And PP, lets be honest here. You know my experience only because I was honest in my inactivity. A sure sign that I am no hypocrite. Right?
Post Reply