Why would Mod Rhad's post be signed 'Smac'?

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_skippy the dead
_Emeritus
Posts: 1676
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:39 am

Post by _skippy the dead »

Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I couldn't help but chuckle to see that Rhad closed one of Smac97's threads with this comment:

This thread has gone totally off-topic and has devolved into personal insults and bickering.

Thread closed.

Rhad.


Smac's thread discusses "mounting" criticism of the movie September Dawn, and can be found here:

http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... opic=26938

I'll admit I haven't slogged through the whole thing (*yawn*), but after seeing who started the thread and who closed it, I had a bit of a giggle. Is that kosher? Funny what happens when you've got secret ID's.
I may be going to hell in a bucket, babe / But at least I'm enjoying the ride.
-Grateful Dead (lyrics by John Perry Barlow)
_barrelomonkeys
_Emeritus
Posts: 3004
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:00 pm

Post by _barrelomonkeys »

skippy the dead wrote:Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I couldn't help but chuckle to see that Rhad closed one of Smac97's threads with this comment:

This thread has gone totally off-topic and has devolved into personal insults and bickering.

Thread closed.

Rhad.


Smac's thread discusses "mounting" criticism of the movie September Dawn, and can be found here:

http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... opic=26938

I'll admit I haven't slogged through the whole thing (*yawn*), but after seeing who started the thread and who closed it, I had a bit of a giggle. Is that kosher? Funny what happens when you've got secret ID's.



hehe. Good find!

:D
_Doctor Steuss
_Emeritus
Posts: 4597
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:57 pm

Post by _Doctor Steuss »

skippy the dead wrote:Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I couldn't help but chuckle to see that Rhad closed one of Smac97's threads with this comment:

This thread has gone totally off-topic and has devolved into personal insults and bickering.

Thread closed.

Rhad.


Smac's thread discusses "mounting" criticism of the movie September Dawn, and can be found here:

http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... opic=26938

I'll admit I haven't slogged through the whole thing (*yawn*), but after seeing who started the thread and who closed it, I had a bit of a giggle. Is that kosher? Funny what happens when you've got secret ID's.


Any thread originator can request to have a thread closed.

Smac just bypassed "asking" to have it closed since it would have essentially been himself that he would have been asking.
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." ~Charles Bukowski
_barrelomonkeys
_Emeritus
Posts: 3004
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:00 pm

Post by _barrelomonkeys »

Doctor Steuss wrote:
skippy the dead wrote:Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I couldn't help but chuckle to see that Rhad closed one of Smac97's threads with this comment:

This thread has gone totally off-topic and has devolved into personal insults and bickering.

Thread closed.

Rhad.


Smac's thread discusses "mounting" criticism of the movie September Dawn, and can be found here:

http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... opic=26938

I'll admit I haven't slogged through the whole thing (*yawn*), but after seeing who started the thread and who closed it, I had a bit of a giggle. Is that kosher? Funny what happens when you've got secret ID's.


Any thread originator can request to have a thread closed.

Smac just bypassed "asking" to have it closed since it would have essentially been himself that he would have been asking.


I like to think that Smac did send Rhad a pm. That's the way I want to view it and so I will. :D
_Doctor Steuss
_Emeritus
Posts: 4597
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:57 pm

Post by _Doctor Steuss »

barrelomonkeys wrote:I like to think that Smac did send Rhad a pm. That's the way I want to view it and so I will. :D


Kind of like the Friends episode where Ross leaves a voicemail for himself... LOL.
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." ~Charles Bukowski
_Bond...James Bond
_Emeritus
Posts: 4627
Joined: Tue Nov 07, 2006 4:49 am

Post by _Bond...James Bond »

Doctor Steuss wrote:Smac just bypassed "asking" to have it closed since it would have essentially been himself that he would have been asking.


I hope there was a Two Towers-esque multiple personality scene featuring Smac/Rhad in the roles of Gollum/Smeagol.
"Whatever appears to be against the Book of Mormon is going to be overturned at some time in the future. So we can be pretty open minded."-charity 3/7/07
_skippy the dead
_Emeritus
Posts: 1676
Joined: Sat Jan 06, 2007 5:39 am

Post by _skippy the dead »

Doctor Steuss wrote:
skippy the dead wrote:Sorry to resurrect an old thread, but I couldn't help but chuckle to see that Rhad closed one of Smac97's threads with this comment:

This thread has gone totally off-topic and has devolved into personal insults and bickering.

Thread closed.

Rhad.


Smac's thread discusses "mounting" criticism of the movie September Dawn, and can be found here:

http://www.mormonapologetics.org/index. ... opic=26938

I'll admit I haven't slogged through the whole thing (*yawn*), but after seeing who started the thread and who closed it, I had a bit of a giggle. Is that kosher? Funny what happens when you've got secret ID's.


Any thread originator can request to have a thread closed.

Smac just bypassed "asking" to have it closed since it would have essentially been himself that he would have been asking.


Still smells funny. He should either close it down as himself, or ask another mod to close it for him - there's plenty of mods that can do it. Kinda like when you work a cash register at a store, you don't ring up your own transaction - you get another cashier to do it for you. Keeps things looking clean.
I may be going to hell in a bucket, babe / But at least I'm enjoying the ride.
-Grateful Dead (lyrics by John Perry Barlow)
_Doctor Steuss
_Emeritus
Posts: 4597
Joined: Fri Feb 09, 2007 6:57 pm

Post by _Doctor Steuss »

skippy the dead wrote:Still smells funny. He should either close it down as himself, or ask another mod to close it for him - there's plenty of mods that can do it. Kinda like when you work a cash register at a store, you don't ring up your own transaction - you get another cashier to do it for you. Keeps things looking clean.


If I had closed it under my mod name, I would have simply commented that it was "Closed at the request of thread originator" (as we do in those situations). It just seems like six of one/half a dozen of another to me.










Edit:
by the way, I'm not a mod. It was a joke, but I just realized some might take me seriously.
"Some people never go crazy. What truly horrible lives they must lead." ~Charles Bukowski
_mocnarf
_Emeritus
Posts: 304
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 6:11 pm

Post by _mocnarf »

Alter Idem wrote:
moksha wrote:
Alter Idem wrote:I agree they'll probably retire Rhad now, since his cover is blown--Too bad; I liked his avatar.


They might be forced to form a double secret society and refer to themselves as "The Julianns".


LOL, Oh, too true. I think they'll have to place Rhad/smac on double secret probation as well. He may not have what it takes to be one of the "Juliannes" if he can't keep his identity secret.


I wonder if he ever has that problem when introducing himself to someone in public... Hello, I'm Joab. oop's forget that. That's my New Name. My real name is.....

You know, keeping all these secrets straight can be difficult at times!
_barrelomonkeys
_Emeritus
Posts: 3004
Joined: Sat Jun 09, 2007 7:00 pm

Post by _barrelomonkeys »

Doctor Steuss wrote:
skippy the dead wrote:Still smells funny. He should either close it down as himself, or ask another mod to close it for him - there's plenty of mods that can do it. Kinda like when you work a cash register at a store, you don't ring up your own transaction - you get another cashier to do it for you. Keeps things looking clean.


If I had closed it under my mod name, I would have simply commented that it was "Closed at the request of thread originator" (as we do in those situations). It just seems like six of one/half a dozen of another to me.










Edit:
by the way, I'm not a mod. It was a joke, but I just realized some might take me seriously.



There's already a dossier in the making. ;)
Post Reply