Themis wrote:The lie was to say he didn't know we teach that. He did know so it was a straight up lie.
You've convinced me. its a straight up lie. My mistake. Seriously, lest someone comes along accusing me of something I didn't say.
I may not know more then you, but I think I am being more honest about it.
O great. Now I"m a liar.
The church teaches we must seek restitution for our sins if possible as part of the repentance process. If a sin was not against anyone it need not include anyone else but you and God. If I steal do you think if I go to the bishop that he will require that I give back what I stole or pay it back as part of the repentance process. Do you really think that if I lie to a group or individual that part of the repentance process would include admitting the lie to those I lied to?
I know the whole formula. I'm not being deceptive here. it is up to the individual to decide if his/her lie is something that he needs to apologize to others for. The restitution may not necessarily require an apology on his part, as he personally deems it. But even if it did, he very well could have made th emistake to not offer the apology. I'd be fine with that too. That'd be between he and God. Not you, me, he, God and every one else here.
I already said I agree with forgiving someone even if they have not repented, but that is not the issue of this thread.
Cool. I'm over it, though. that's my point. Thanks for the converse.
Wait...did I say you can have the last word on this? Oh crap...I figure out who i said that to now. I pipe up far too much. Sorry if I said you can have it. I can't find where I said that and to whom.