As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become.

The catch-all forum for general topics and debates. Minimal moderation. Rated PG to PG-13.
Post Reply
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become.

Post by _Quasimodo »

stemelbow wrote:And some people will not agree with your conclusion here--that its a good reason not to be a member. So we'll still have members. Complaining about it now, isn't going to work, I think.



Arrrgggghhh! It's like talking to a brick wall! :)

I understand that my little posts will not sway your opinion. I just put them up for others that might be a little more objective. You have to admit that your position is a little hard to defend.

There will still be members (though I think the numbers are dropping). Converts might be a little harder to come by after that interview. One can only hope.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
_Themis
_Emeritus
Posts: 13426
Joined: Wed Feb 17, 2010 6:43 pm

Re: As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become.

Post by _Themis »

stemelbow wrote:
He fibbed. He didn't come out and say the teaching or idea was wrong so it wasn't necessarily some straight up lie.


The lie was to say he didn't know we teach that. He did know so it was a straight up lie.

Oh come on...What in this link suggests I'm wrong. Lets not fight about whether you know more than me. Let's discuss it.


I may not know more then you, but I think I am being more honest about it. The church teaches we must seek restitution for our sins if possible as part of the repentance process. If a sin was not against anyone it need not include anyone else but you and God. If I steal do you think if I go to the bishop that he will require that I give back what I stole or pay it back as part of the repentance process. Do you really think that if I lie to a group or individual that part of the repentance process would include admitting the lie to those I lied to?

Indeed. I admitted it, from my perspective. And I don't make a fuss about one man's lie. That's probably true too. Normally I simply like to be positive and forgiving of people.


I already said I agree with forgiving someone even if they have not repented, but that is not the issue of this thread.
42
_zeezrom
_Emeritus
Posts: 11938
Joined: Wed Dec 30, 2009 8:57 pm

Re: As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become.

Post by _zeezrom »

One more question. Why are people so scared to think GBH lied? He isn't perfect. Nobody seems to care when I say Joseph Smith Jr. lied about polygamy and his translation abilities.
Oh for shame, how the mortals put the blame on us gods, for they say evils come from us, but it is they, rather, who by their own recklessness win sorrow beyond what is given... Zeus (1178 BC)

The Holy Sacrament.
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become.

Post by _stemelbow »

Quasimodo wrote:Arrrgggghhh! It's like talking to a brick wall! :)


I"m unmovable. Little but tough. Thin but scrappy.

I understand that my little posts will not sway your opinion. I just put them up for others that might be a little more objective. You have to admit that your position is a little hard to defend.

There will still be members (though I think the numbers are dropping). Converts might be a little harder to come by after that interview. One can only hope.


The interview was over 10 years ago and the percent increase has, I believe, decreased since that time. So maybe your hope has worked out for ya. Maybe the whole decrease in the rate of increase is because of Hinckley and that one interview. We'll have to see how the Man upstairs deals with that.
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_Joseph
_Emeritus
Posts: 3517
Joined: Sun May 16, 2010 11:00 pm

Re: As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become.

Post by _Joseph »

I don't see the purpose of worrying about it now, though.
******************************

If the maximum leader lies to all who would investigate Mormonism both pro & con, how can you trust him?
"This is how INGORNAT these fools are!" - darricktevenson

Bow your head and mutter, what in hell am I doing here?

infaymos wrote: "Peterson is the defacto king ping of the Mormon Apologetic world."
_OSWIT
_Emeritus
Posts: 96
Joined: Wed May 26, 2010 4:44 pm

Re: As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become.

Post by _OSWIT »

zeezrom wrote:One more question. Why are people so scared to think GBH lied? He isn't perfect. Nobody seems to care when I say Joseph Smith Jr. lied about polygamy and his translation abilities.


Presentism I guess
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become.

Post by _stemelbow »

Themis wrote:The lie was to say he didn't know we teach that. He did know so it was a straight up lie.


You've convinced me. its a straight up lie. My mistake. Seriously, lest someone comes along accusing me of something I didn't say.

I may not know more then you, but I think I am being more honest about it.


O great. Now I"m a liar.

The church teaches we must seek restitution for our sins if possible as part of the repentance process. If a sin was not against anyone it need not include anyone else but you and God. If I steal do you think if I go to the bishop that he will require that I give back what I stole or pay it back as part of the repentance process. Do you really think that if I lie to a group or individual that part of the repentance process would include admitting the lie to those I lied to?


I know the whole formula. I'm not being deceptive here. it is up to the individual to decide if his/her lie is something that he needs to apologize to others for. The restitution may not necessarily require an apology on his part, as he personally deems it. But even if it did, he very well could have made th emistake to not offer the apology. I'd be fine with that too. That'd be between he and God. Not you, me, he, God and every one else here.

I already said I agree with forgiving someone even if they have not repented, but that is not the issue of this thread.


Cool. I'm over it, though. that's my point. Thanks for the converse.

Wait...did I say you can have the last word on this? Oh crap...I figure out who i said that to now. I pipe up far too much. Sorry if I said you can have it. I can't find where I said that and to whom.
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_stemelbow
_Emeritus
Posts: 5872
Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:40 pm

Re: As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become.

Post by _stemelbow »

If the maximum leader lies to all who would investigate Mormonism both pro & con, how can you trust him?


Under such logic how can anyone trust anyone since everyone lies at some point?
Love ya tons,
Stem


I ain't nuttin'. don't get all worked up on account of me.
_Buffalo
_Emeritus
Posts: 12064
Joined: Tue Nov 09, 2010 10:33 pm

Re: As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become.

Post by _Buffalo »

bcspace wrote:
So what was his angle in making this statement?


Milk before meat (or pearls before swine) is the only possibility.


Also known as lying for the Lord.
Parley P. Pratt wrote:We must lie to support brother Joseph, it is our duty to do so.

B.R. McConkie, © Intellectual Reserve wrote:There are those who say that revealed religion and organic evolution can be harmonized. This is both false and devilish.
_Quasimodo
_Emeritus
Posts: 11784
Joined: Sun Oct 24, 2010 1:11 am

Re: As man is, God once was. As God is, man may become.

Post by _Quasimodo »

stemelbow wrote:The interview was over 10 years ago and the percent increase has, I believe, decreased since that time. So maybe your hope has worked out for ya. Maybe the whole decrease in the rate of increase is because of Hinckley and that one interview. We'll have to see how the Man upstairs deals with that.


Tough and scrappy are good things (that's what makes you fun to tussle with).

I do believe (my own personal opinion) that the LDS church is on a slow slide into obscurity. The fact that you and I are here having this discussion is one reason I think so.

The internet could well be the death knell. It will take time, but I think it's inevitable. Too much evidence against and no evidence for the Church.

I know that is not your viewpoint, but that's what makes all this fun.

Congratulations on being a God! I'm still hoping to get next weeks lottery numbers from you.
This, or any other post that I have made or will make in the future, is strictly my own opinion and consequently of little or no value.

"Faith is believing something you know ain't true" Twain.
Post Reply