DCP Targets Paul Osborne in a Smear Campaign

[drumdude]

I believe this thread accusing DCP of executing a "smear campaign" violates board rules.

Smear campaigns could be interpreted as illegal activity.

You’re doing that thing again where you hyper focus on one point with hundreds of posts. You said you could disengage from the rosebud drama, could you tone it down a little on this point? I think we all get it.

Have you seen my post praising DCP recently, by the way?

[jpatterson]

I believe this thread accusing DCP of executing a "smear campaign" violates board rules.

Smear campaigns could be interpreted as illegal activity.

You’re doing that thing again where you hyper focus on one point with hundreds of posts. You said you could disengage from the rosebud drama, could you tone it down a little on this point? I think we all get it.

Have you seen my post praising DCP recently, by the way?

Disengage on what point? Is it okay for people to accuse other members of criminal activity or not?

[drumdude]

You’re doing that thing again where you hyper focus on one point with hundreds of posts. You said you could disengage from the rosebud drama, could you tone it down a little on this point? I think we all get it.

Have you seen my post praising DCP recently, by the way?

Disengage on what point? Is it okay for people to accuse other members of criminal activity or not?

The hallmark is when you start reaching and arguing that”sMeArInG mIgHt bE cOnSTruEd aS a CrImE lol”

We get it, you think the board is full of hypocrites and idiots.

[Shulem]

I believe this thread accusing DCP of executing a "smear campaign" violates board rules.

Smear campaigns could be interpreted as illegal activity.

You believe it, huh? Well, 15 long years have gone by and you bring this objection up now in order to enlighten the rest of us?

Your late objection is noted but is immediately dismissed.

Bark up another tree, please.

[jpatterson]

I believe this thread accusing DCP of executing a "smear campaign" violates board rules.

Smear campaigns could be interpreted as illegal activity.

You believe it, huh? Well, 15 long years have gone by and you bring this objection up now in order to enlighten the rest of us?

Your late objection is noted but is immediately dismissed.

Bark up another tree, please.

I bring this objection now because moderation practices have recently come into question.

If we're going to enforce the rules regarding public figures who are members here, let's enforce them equally.

[Shulem]

I bring this objection now because moderation practices have recently come into question.

If we're going to enforce the rules regarding public figures who are members here, let's enforce them equally.

This board is not going to fall into chaos.

Request denied!

[Kishkumen]

Shulem, you are the living end!

[Jersey Girl]

You believe it, huh? Well, 15 long years have gone by and you bring this objection up now in order to enlighten the rest of us?

Your late objection is noted but is immediately dismissed.

Bark up another tree, please.

I bring this objection now because moderation practices have recently come into question.

If we're going to enforce the rules regarding public figures who are members here, let's enforce them equally.

If you have an objection to bring you should be doing it in a new topic thread wherein you link to this thread with examples that you believe make your points and hash it out there.

You're welcome.