Water Dog wrote:Price of tea in china? You know what else members do, watch porn! I said in my first post about this that old habits die hard. Doesn't change the objective fact that the leadership is trying to rid the culture of this behavior, which is the point...
Lemmie wrote:Actually, in your first post in this thread, you said this, which really makes me doubt you are objectively considering the situation:That's quite an assumption to make, "probably."Water Dog wrote:And there is also probably more information than meets the eye, like the leadership/ward may have already had a history of certain behaviors with this girl and her family.
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=46320&p=1060067&view=show#p1060067
Water Dog wrote:Note that I said "in my first post about this," not "in my first post in this thread."
Who said you didn't? What's your point?
My point was that in your first post on this thread you made the following assumption about the girl's family that weakened your subsequent arguments:
Water Dog, first post in this thread, wrote:And there is also probably more information than meets the eye, like the leadership/ward may have already had a history of certain behaviors with this girl and her family.